PDA

View Full Version : NATO: More Troops for Afghanistan?


SWJED
11-28-2006, 08:36 AM
28 November NY Times editorial - Slouching Toward Riga (http://www.nytimes.com/2006/11/28/opinion/28tue2.html)

When NATO leaders gather in Latvia this week, there will undoubtedly be a lot of grand talk about how the cold-war alliance has managed to elude irrelevance, bringing in new members, dispatching humanitarian aid and deploying peacekeepers beyond Europe’s borders.

But the real issue before the annual summit meeting is that NATO is failing its most significant post-Soviet test: stabilizing Afghanistan. Violence is spiraling as the Taliban and Al Qaeda reassert their power. The economy is addicted to opium production. The pro-Western government in Kabul looks increasingly powerless and irrelevant.

Unless NATO’s members commit to sending in more troops and more resources, Afghanistan could go the way of Iraq. There may not be many more chances after this week’s meeting.

The current 32,000-member NATO force is too small. Some provinces — including those along the border with Pakistan, where the Taliban have their sanctuaries — have little or no allied presence...

jcustis
11-28-2006, 01:10 PM
NATO cannot win there. We need to increase our commitment, reconstruction efforts, and get it done. Just call it a hunch.