PDA

View Full Version : The best analysis I've read of our last few wars.



davidbfpo
10-27-2015, 11:48 AM
Thanks to a "lurker" pointing to a US ArmyWar College paper (200 plus pgs), by Dr Chris Mason (pub. June 2015) 'The Strategic Lessons Unlearned from Vietnam, Iraq and Afghanistan: Why the Afghan National Security Forces Will Not Hold, and the Implications for the U.S. Army in Afghanistan'.
Link:http://www.strategicstudiesinstitute.army.mil/pubs/display.cfm?pubID=1269

It is free to download and is available in the Kindle format.

From the Executive Summary:
The wars in Vietnam, Iraq, and Afghanistan were lost before they began, not on the battlefields, where the United States won every tactical engagement, but at the strategic level of war. In each case, the U.S. Government attempted to create a Western-style democracy in countries which were decades at least away from being nations with the sociopolitical capital necessary to sustain democracy and, most importantly, accept it as a legitimate source of governance. The expensive indigenous armies created in the image of the U.S. Army lacked both the motivation to fight for illegitimate governments in Saigon, Baghdad, and Kabul and a cause that they believed was worth dying for, while their enemies in the field clearly did not. This book examines the Afghan National Security Forces in historical and political contexts, explains why they will fail at the tactical, operational and strategic levels of war, why they cannot and will not succeed in holding the southern half of the country, and what will happen in Afghanistan year-by-year from 2015 to 2019. Finally, it examines what the critical lessons unlearned of these conflicts are for U.S. military leaders, why these fundamental political lessons seem to remain unlearned, and how the strategic mistakes of the past can be avoided in the future.

It will join my reading list, three books awaiting!

I know these issues have appeared on the Forum, elsewhere on SWJ and in the media, notably IIRC a WaPo article recently.