Originally Posted by
Steve Blair
What I mean by that is that the author tends to slant many of his statements into the "it's a wonderful Air Force" framework. For example, the section about Linebacker II contains no discussion about the flaws in the initial planning of the campaign, or how those flaws were corrected. He also makes the very sweeping conclusion (in line with what could be called the official Air Force view) that had Linebacker II happened years before, North Vietnam would have halted its aggression. This is a very flawed claim that ignores the history of Vietnam and other important factors (like the nature of NVN's involvement in the South, the lack of good targets for strategic air attacks in NVN, the international reaction that would have followed such heavy bombardment no matter when it was conducted), and the international circumstances (Nixon's diplomatic moves with both the Soviet Union and China...something that did NOT exist during the Kennedy or Johnson administrations).
It's an entertaining read, but not what I would call a serious history.