OK, even if we were to accept that possibility
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Rex Brynen
I would also add that we should be careful not to assume that the Chinese always see these incidents in exactly the same way we do.
It isn't clear to me, for example, that Beijing is convinced that the ROKS Cheonan was necessarily sunk by a North Korean torpedo. Beijing may also agree with Pyongyang that ROK live-fire naval exercises just outside a disputed maritime boundary were provocative, and may even lend some credence to North Korean claims that the incident started when South Korean shells landed in Northern territory.
Exactly how does firing on civilian targets actually in South Korean territory fit within Chinese parameters of acceptability.
May just be me, but if they believed as you say wouldn't it seem like this particular action puts them in a rather tough position to say that the North was being unduly accused on the Cheonan.
And lets not forget that its the North who decided to walk someone through to get a look at their new toys just a little bit ago. Somehow the narrative here doesn't seem to help much with the Chinese pushing back against accusations of undue provocations by Kim and company.
:confused:
South Korea defence minister resigns after attack
From the Mail & Guardian:
Quote:
South Korean President Lee Myung-bak accepted the resignation of his defence minister on Thursday, two days after an attack by North Korea and amid criticism that the South's response was too slow.