Steve, good food for thought
Quote:
... but implementation requires a completely different structure, staffing and resources ....
Kind of reminds me of that addage - "How bad do you want it?"
You don't have to break anything -- just put a slight dent
in the appropriate skulls if violence is the answer -- it does not have to be regime removal or anything requiring a rebuild.
Fuchs has a good point about the UN Charter. Unfortunately, that Charter did not envision non-state actors who could and would challenge States. Getting revisions to that Charter would be virtually impossible due to penis envy so the world would just have to accept that SBW is the way to go...
That's true -- to an extent...
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Rob Thornton
Agree with Steve - its got to stand up to the FAS (Feasible, Acceptable and Suitable) test...
That's desirable but gets overtaken by the item that is true:
Quote:
I'm more inclined to agree with Old Eagle that its important we retain the capability to do the range of things we will surely be asked/told to go do...
All very true. I'd add two things. We cannot now do all the things we might be told to do; we have deliberately avoided strategic raid capability and a few other options -- we need to be prepared to do more than we were able to do prior to 2001 and we need to be able to offer those options rather than the sole option we thought we had at that time.
The Politicians will ask us to strange things and we should be prepared to do most of them in some fashion. We have been our own worst enemy with our inherent inflexibility -- we became a one trick pony and are paying for it. We attempted to influence national policy with military policy (The Weinberger and Powell Doctrines) and that was never going to work. Accepting what you say, Rob, is imperative -- and being able to offer a number of options including 'do nothing' to the deciders is truly vital in the strict sense of the word.
Where will all those civilians come from?
there are not too many options.
a. reinstitue draft
b. pay them a higher or equivavalent of their civilan income
I don't see it happening anytime soon. Cuz' then the soldiers earnings has to be raised too.
MikeF
Naw, Wilf. The American Empire just practices a unique brand that I'll call politically-correct colonialism. We really shouldn't be in the Empire business. We're much better off when we don't meddle into others affairs.
Luckily/unfortunately -I can't decide- the days of good ol' isolationism are gone.