I am somewhat surprised that there was no response to the Kings of War blog entry.
This has been followed up with a response by the author to the comments made following his first entry.
Bourne (Again) Criticisms? A Review of the Commentary
Printable View
I am somewhat surprised that there was no response to the Kings of War blog entry.
This has been followed up with a response by the author to the comments made following his first entry.
Bourne (Again) Criticisms? A Review of the Commentary
A year or two ago I posted a link to a news story relating to 'problems' Australian forces were reportedly experiencing in Afghanistan. That post of mine was almost instantly deleted by some heavy handed moderator.
The article related to (IIRC) the frustration of Australian infantry deployed in Afghanistan in a non-offensive role which had led, it was reported, to increased drug abuse and even incidences of 'selling sex' (male or female was not specified) among Australian soldiers in theatre.
It appears that the previous two articles I posted links to deal with what should now be confirmed as serious issues among Australian troops.
Parallel to this is the ongoing sex and abuse scandals which never seem to go-away. The latest being:
Australian military abuse detailed in damning report
This follows after the previous report:
Sex scandal hits Australian military
Not picking on the Australian military but by way of an example how does one deal with a military which seems to be in a tail spin? Merely firing the generals may not be enough if the system is rotten to the core.
Ah... a defensive knee jerk reaction from an Aussie.
Lets start with the meaning of the word seems (a sample):
1. Used to make a statement or description of one's thoughts, feelings, or actions less assertive or forceful.
2. To appear to one's own opinion or mind
3. To give the impression of being; appear
etc etc.
Right I will answer your question and expect you to respond to the substance of my recent posts.
A small military (103,000 ?) such as Australia has seems to be getting a lot of bad press recently. If one reads the articles linked by me in previous posts it would appear/seem/look as if there are major disciplinary problems in the Australian military.
I also know that (have been told) that there is a lock down on information relating to the 'CO's Report'. I have managed to get a copy of 20 odd paragraphs of it (but have been sworn to secrecy on my source).
I guess a statement or rebuttal from official sources is unlikely so readers will have to be forgiven if they speculate on just how bad the situation is.
So ... all that said ... back to my question.
If a nation/country/military is faced with a disciplinary 'problem' as it seems/appears/looks Australia is from what is available in the media how is it best dealt with?
The Canadian Airborne Regiment was disbanded after the Somalia affair... and there I was thinking that discipline begins with the officers.
Link:http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/...92O13E20130325Quote:
Australia will withdraw most troops from Afghanistan's south at the end of this year and shut down a major base for NATO-led forces, handing security to Afghan soldiers and police, Defense Minister Stephen Smith said on Tuesday.
This not unexpected, but appears to be a year early. The position of their SOF is less clear:Quote:
Australia had not yet decided whether special forces troops would remain in Afghanistan next year or after 2014, Smith said, with negotiations still underway with the Afghan government.
More of a pre-withdrawal review article and copied here:The Long Road: Uruzgan, Afghanistan, on the Path to Stability
A quick summary, with an interesting, possibly unique political point:The Diggers next role, including SOF:Quote:
Prime Minister Tony Abbott has declared a symbolic end to 'Australia's longest war', even though about 400 troops will remain in Afghanistan next year and perhaps beyond...Accompanied by Opposition Leader Bill Shorten in the first ever bipartisan visit....
Link:http://www.skynews.com.au/topstories...aspx?id=919542Quote:
However, some 400 will remain in a variety of non-combat roles including mentoring of the Afghan National Army (ANA) 205 Corps headquarters in Kandahar and of instructors at the ANA Officer Academy in Kabul. A small group of 18 special forces soldiers will remain in an advisory role in Kabul.
'Land, Kill and Leave': How Australian Special Forces Helped Lose the War in Afghanistan
This article is one of series released by ABC today; on a quick review some of the allegations have been in the Australian public domain before, now they have documents to support the series.
Read the full post and make any comments at the SWJ Blog.
An article from the Sydney Morning Herald and reflective on what happened to the Australian SAS. Here are two short passages:Link:https://www.smh.com.au/politics/fede...01-p4zux2.htmlQuote:
A traditional role of applying and gathering intelligence had been displaced by a lust for kill counts....A traditional role of applying and gathering intelligence had been displaced by a lust for kill counts.