SOW = Special Operations Warfare; UW = Unconventional Warfare.
Here are the doctrinal references supporting the proposition that AQ wages Special Operations Warfare aka Unconventional Warfare, based on Robert Martinage, Special Operations Forces: Future Challenges and Opportunities (CSBA 17 Nov 2008), Chapter 1. A Primer on Special Operations Forces, pp.28-30 (pdf).
Martinage sums each area with doctrinal refs. Brief JMM comments re: AQ after the quotes.
The primary concept begins with the DoD definition of "special operations":
Quote:
The Department of Defense defines special operations as “operations conducted in hostile, denied, or politically sensitive environments to achieve military, diplomatic, informational, and/or economic objectives employing military capabilities for which there is no broad conventional force requirement.”[13] They differ from conventional operations in the “degree of physical and political risk, operational techniques, mode of employment, independence from friendly support, and dependence on detailed operational intelligence and indigenous assets.”[14]
13. Joint Publication 1-02, “Department of Defense Dictionary of Military and Associated Terms,” as amended through May 30, 2008, p. 516. Hereafter sometimes cited as Joint Pub 1-02.
14. Joint Pub 1-02, p. 517.
Since AQ is a near-global pariah, its operations must of necessity occur in "hostile, denied, or politically sensitive environments".
More specifically, SOF are currently organized, trained, and equipped to conduct nine core tasks, starting with Civil Affairs (CA).
Quote:
> Civil Affairs (CA): CA missions create a link between the commander and the local population or government by providing key social and governmental services when the local government cannot; by keeping civilians safely away from combat operations; by establishing programs to build trust between the US military forces and the local population; and by supporting information operations.[15]
15. Joint Publication 3-57.1: Joint Doctrine for Civil Affairs, p. II-2. Hereafter sometimes cited as Joint Pub 3-57.1
CA- It is well to remember that UBL was primarily a civil affairs officer (engineer) vs the SovComs in Astan.
Quote:
> Counterproliferation (CP): CP missions are offensive actions to“locate, seize, destroy, render safe, capture or recover weapons of mass destruction (WMD).”[16] Counterproliferation includes actions taken to prevent the development or proliferation of WMD.
16. Joint Pub 3-57.1., p. II-10.
CP- AQ, so far mostly unsuccessfully, has a tasked mission to obtain WMD. This is one of two AQ special operations (the other is CT) where their end goal is the reverse of our misson - but still a special operation (albeit, in our eyes, perverted)
Quote:
> Counterterrorism (CT): CT missions are offensive actions to “prevent, deter, preempt and respond to terrorism.”[17] They include intelligence operations; attacks against terrorist networks and infrastructures; hostage rescue; recovery of sensitive material from terrorist organizations; and non-kinetic activities such as information and psychological operations designed to decrease the influence of terrorist groups and their ideologies.
17. Joint Pub 1-02, p. 131.
CT- Another example of an AQ special operation that is the reverse of our mission.
Quote:
> Direct Action (DA ): DA missions are short-duration strikes and other small-scale offensive actions to seize, destroy, capture, exploit, recover, or damage designated targets of strategic or operational significance, employing specialized military capabilities. Direct action differs from conventional raids by the value of the target, the politically sensitive or hostile nature of the environment, and the need for highly discriminatory applications of force.[18]
18. Joint Pub 3-57.1, p. II-4. See also Joint Pub 1-02, p. 161.
DA- AQ's direct actions include 9/11.
Quote:
> Foreign Internal Defense (FID ): FID missions build the capacity of partner nations to provide for their own internal security. SOF’s primary contribution to FID is to organize, train, advise and assist host-nation (HN) military and paramilitary forces. It includes SOF support to any programs taken by another government to free and protect its society from subversion, lawlessness, and insurgency.[19]
19. Joint Pub 1-02, p. 214 .
FID- AQ does it (not for nations, but for groups) - see UW below.
Here next is a twofer:
Quote:
> Information Operations (IO): The integrated employment of the core capabilities of electronic warfare, computer network operations, psychological operations, military deception, and operations security to influence, disrupt, corrupt or usurp adversarial human and automated decision-making while protecting the joint force’s information capabilities.[20]
20. Joint Pub 1-02, p. 261.
> Psychological Operations (PSYO PS): Planned operations to convey selected information to foreign governments, organizations, groups, and individuals in order to influence their emotions, motives, objective reasoning, and ultimately their behavior. The purpose of psychological operations is to induce or reinforce foreign attitudes and behavior that are favorable to US interests. Typically, this is achieved through the dissemination of information by dedicated PSYOP units.[21]
21. Joint Pub 1-02, p. 44 ; and Joint Pub 3-57.1, p. II-11.
IO & PO- AQ does this well.
Quote:
> Special Reconnaissance (SR): Reconnaissance and surveillance actions conducted to collect or verify information of strategic or operational significance, employing military capabilities and tactics, techniques, and procedures not normally found in conventional forces.[22]
22. Joint Pub 1-02, p. 512; and Joint Pub 3-57.1, p. II-6.
SR- AQ also does this.
Quote:
> Unconventional Warfare (UW): UW operations are conducted by, with, or through irregular forces in support of a resistance movement, an insurgency, or conventional military operations. Unconventional warfare encompasses a broad spectrum of military and paramilitary operations, including: guerrilla warfare, subversion, sabotage, intelligence activities, and unconventional assisted recovery. While unconventional warfare is traditionally considered to be aimed at the destabilization or overthrow of a state, it can also be conducted against non-state actors such as transnational terrorist groups. In that application, irregular forces can be controlled by US forces directly in permissive or semi-permissive environments, and indirectly in hostile or politically sensitive areas.[23]
23. Field Manual 3-05.130, Army Special Operations Forces Unconventional Warfare; and Joint Pub 1-02, p. 572.
UW- Since most everything that AQ does takes place in denied areas, AQ can be said to be waging unconventional warfare covering a larger scope in activities than our UW definition. More to our stricter definition, AQ supports larger groups (insurgencies), smaller groups (e.g., Madrid and London train bombings), and even individuals where the support is indirect and moral only (MAJ Hasan), located in what to AQ is "enemy territory".
That's my best shot (doctrinal and legal) at explaining the proposition that AQ wages Special Operations Warfare aka Unconventional Warfare. I expect that COL Jones can expound, expand and explain his concept in his own terms.
Regards
Mike
PS - to Da Mods. Should this discussion re: the proposition that AQ wages Special Operations Warfare aka Unconventional Warfare, be in a separate thread ? It starts with Bob's World post #63 (interspersed after that with unrelated posts).