When you have an AFV nearby and a cannon on it, all the better. It is hard to carry that kind of firepower on your back. A Leopard should make the enemy in Afghanistan think twice before directly attacking you.
Firn
Printable View
Point taken.
So I read it again, thrice. Still pondering it and still not sure where to go with it.
It appears the Russians in A-stan made good use of the Vasilek, I think reasonably well within the context described by Jim Storr. However, they seem to have mounted most on light armoured vehicles. That would go well beyond what Storr is trying to achieve for light infantry, I think. And bringing back the old Scorpion might then even be more suitable.
Speaking of Scorpion, this may be of some interest.
Probably still a bit too big and heavy though.
Years ago I had a buddy who was involved in a program (sometime in the early '90s I think) to test mounting the Bushmaster on a HMMWV. This was when the idea of light cav was still controversial and they were experimenting with ways to upgrade the gun HMMWVs. He was a cav guy from the old days when 2nd Cav still had the Fulda Gap mission. According to him, the Bushmaster simply shook the truck apart in fairly short order. Naturally the program was scrapped.
Years ago, as a very young soldier, I spent time in a Wombat platoon (L6) - 120mm RRL mounted on a Land-Rover. You ONLY fired it mounted on the Land Rover in an Emergency! - cos it basically broke the vehicle by all accounts - yet skills and drills wise, we always practised bringing the weapon into action while it was mounted on the vehicle!!
the same one used in the ADM and also used in a few other applications. In low KT versions, the one used by the Davy Crockett, the effective blast and killing radiation radius was less than a fifth of the nominal effective range of the weapon. The weapon was in service for about ten years; its major prob was the CEP. Picture trying to use an RPG as a point weapon at max range... :o
Wilf, is this mortar still prototype? Did the STI Kinetics manage to put this mortar only on truck?
http://i.imagehost.org/t/0123/p2224358oa1.jpg
Here is one Rhodesian mortar unit.
http://i.imagehost.org/t/0319/Rhodesian_mortar.jpg
The mortar is in use on Singapore's Broncos.
http://www.military-today.com/apc/bronco.htm
In the place where I fly there are many small aircraft, manned turboprops and drones, flying around below 12,000 ft., sometimes stacked at 500 ft intervals. They do occasionally shoot manpads at us.
Perhaps Fuchs argument is more geared toward a high intensity fight.
Wilf, sometimes you need to trade all-in-one solution :) It seems that those guys need also second car.
http://i.imagehost.org/t/0265/efssus09.jpg
Fuchs can correct me, but if I rembember correctly in German paratrooper batallion 1 120 mm mortar team has 2 MB jeeps with (50 mortar shells).
I can just speculte that in IED-intensive world those crews are real magnets and top target lists.
It appears that the procurement of the ludicrously expensive Growler was justified to help justify the Osprey, or was it the other way around:p? Cool little vehicle though. I want one.
From linked article:
Quote:
The system requires two of the hybrid helicopter-airplane Ospreys in order to be moved - one to transport the unarmored vehicle and mortars and one to carry a second unarmored vehicle and ammunition trailer.
In the Marine Corps' planning, a third Osprey would ferry troops to support the mortar team.
It looks like a Jeep, but it’s not.
Now if a direct fire 81 mm version of the afore mentioned STI Kinetics mortar could be fitted on or behind a vehicle like this, than that could be just what Jim Storr is looking for with added indirect fire capabilities.
Is it just me who thinks that the vehicle/trailer combo is faced wrongly? The vehicle should be able to move out without much trouble, so it should face towards the rear ramp when in the V-22 body.
The German mountain and airborne infantry use Wolf 4wd vehicles (Mercedes G Wagon) (0.75t class iirc) for their 120mm mortars; a known deficiency. A LRIP of 120mm Wiesel 2 is expected for the next few years. I'm not sure about the supply part in the Wiesel2 mortar concept; likely Wolf.
On the Growler homepage, check out the back wheel on the first photo of the vehicle. Does it look like it’s turned? That could go a long way to explaining the cost increases and would have been done to allow the vehicle with trailer to back in or out of the Osprey easier, I suspect.
Maybe.
The German army had a similar requirement for all-wheel steering during the late 20's and early 30's until it was generally accepted to be unimportant in comparison to 4wd OR very low ground pressure.
The price is in my opinion simply a product of profit, custom engineering, tiny production run and non-industrial assembly.
They should have bought one-the-market 6wd ATVs instead.
I would load an Osprey with this hardware by pushing the trailer backwards up the ramp with the vehicle, uncouple it and push it to the front end of the cargo area.
The drive vehicle into it backwards, pull the trailer to the vehicle, connect both, rig the whole stuff and voila - about five to ten minutes.
Upon arrival you would only need to loosen the rigging and drive out - one minute or less.