Conflict, war and medicine (catch all).

Moderator at work

I have merged a small number of threads into one, retitling it 'Conflict, war and medicene' (catch all).

The old threads were: "The Medical Role In Army Stability Operations": COL Neel, Military Medicine
and 'Military Medical Assets as Counterinsurgency Force Multipliers: A Call to Action'.(ends)

I know there are few threads on medical matters, including RFIs, but there appears to be no thread on the developments made in recent wars on frontline medical care. IIRC posts exist about the changes in training combat troops on initial care, by JMA and others.

This thread thought was prompted by watching a BBC 2 TV documentary 'Frontline Medicine':

Quote:

---

Michael Mosley travels from the frontline of war to the frontline of research to uncover the medical breakthroughs that are coming out of current conflicts.

---

Part One (today):

Quote:

---

the medical advances driven by the conflict in Afghanistan

---

and Part Two (next week):

Quote:

---

how medicine and technology can help to rebuild shattered lives.

---

Link:http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b017ld7n

Yes, I know BBC TV is often not available beyond the UK, but I know some here can find a way!

A summary of the first part:http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-15771688

UK Defence Medical Services website:http://www.mod.uk/DefenceInternet/MicroSite/DMS/

BBC summary on:

Quote:

---

Clinical trials are under way in the UK of new blood transfusion procedures for patients with traumatic injuries

---

Link:http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-15741800

Note the hospital at Camp Bastion was shown to be a multi-national facility, with US, UK, Danish and New Zealand flags.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by davidbfpo

Yes, I know BBC TV is often not available beyond the UK, but I know some here can find a way!

---

Surely an officer of the law is not suborning digital piracy??? ;)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ganulv

Surely an officer of the law is not suborning digital piracy??? ;)

---

No, just acknowledging my IT skills are poor compared to many here and who have time to locate a TV segment far beyond the UK. I am sure the BBC have resources to decide whether such an acquisition is 'digital piracy'. Finally I am a retired 'officer of the law' and feel no obligation to guard corporations digital resources.

I had wanted to put together a small article for SWJ on the topic but quickly realized that much of what I know from my civilian experience is not helpful in understanding what I am reading. I thought instead to post various things that I've found, in hopes that it might be of use to somebody.

It is also interesting to note that modernization theory rears its head again and again. From the Neel paper (Military Medicine-August 1967:605-608):

Quote:

---

"Most emerging nations share the fundamental problem of a significant degree of medical deprivation. The modernization process of each such nation can be markedly inhibited by its health deficiencies. An essential objective, then, is to increase the level of medical self-sufficiency in emerging nations."

---

The following on experiences in distance learning in Afghanistan is a bit sobering, and yet, might prove useful in the current context if approached in the correct way:

Quote:

---

I worked on a UNESCO project for four months in Afghanistan in 1977 to build an educational radio system. However, the President of Afghanistan at the time wanted a news television station instead, which was built by Japanese loan money, so the education radio network never got built. Within days of the TV station opening, the Soviet Union invaded and they took over the TV network."

---

http://www.tonybates.ca/2011/01/11/d...in-afghanistan

The reason I posted the above in this starter thread is that I am interested in distance medical education and curriculum development. Such tools may not work in all settings, but it is nice to have a variety of tools to use if needed:

Quote:

---

"TUSK is being used as a platform for curriculum co-development and global sharing across institutions. An export-import tool allows easy movement of content across institutions."

---

http://www.ucel.ad.uk/oer12/abstracts/326.html

Schools in Ghana, Uganda, Tanzania, Democratic Republic of the Congo, and India use such tools already, and other African countries are to follow according to the above link.

And there is the Aga Khan network and cell phone distance education curriculum in a variety of places, including Afghanistan. I found a program on oral radio education in Somalia:

Quote:

---

"We use local stories, poems, and music. While it essentially provides reading and math instruction, lessons also address drought, health, malaria prevention, water filtration, and conflict resolution. Parents find this extremely useful. Many adults are listening, and that wasn't anticipated."

---

http://www.edc.org/newsroom/articles/teaching_radio

I am surprised how many distance medical education tools are already available online, including medical "flashcards" in a variety of Afghan languages. I think this is key. There is much already available, online, open source, and using host nation infrastructures.

First Ask, First Do No Harm, would be my motto.

I have more papers in this area that I've dug up and will post accordingly.

Update: How all of this connects up with "vital" security interests--whatever those are--I really have no idea. But if people in charge think medical operations are useful, it's useful to think about what might be sustainable, less intrusive, and less expensive. Training the medical trainers and all that....

Interesting thread Madhu and i like your stone soup approach :wry:

This link might be of interest. I am told (and believe) that it is a worthwhile experience and it seems that there are many commanalities when comparing the experience (and outcomes) to that of some of our 'non-lethal' efforts.

Stop Transmission of Polio (STOP) Program

Quote:

---

The global effort to eradicate polio is the largest public health initiative in history. The initiative was established in 1988 by the World Health Assembly (WHA) with the goal of eradicating polio by the year 2000 while strengthening capacity to control other major childhood diseases. At the 130th Session of the Executive Board (EB) of the World Health Assembly (WHA) in January 2012, delegates recognized the progress made to date on the three-year Program of Work on polio eradication initiative and called for additional human resources to assist with country level efforts. To fill the request for more staff for the field, the STOP program has expanded its assignments from 3 to 5 month assignments starting with the team being trained in June 2012. To obtain more information and to get updates about the progress of the initiative worldwide, please visit the Global Polio Eradication Initiative website.

To meet the target date of polio eradication, the global partners are looking for ways to supplement human resources at the field level. The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) is therefore seeking short-term, highly qualified, health professionals to join our Stop Transmission of Polio (STOP) teams for 5½ month non-salaried field assignments (travel and per diem for food and lodging provided.)

---

It would be interesting to see a content of analysis of the sort of literature you are looking at to see whether the modernization talk subsides in any way post-Cold War.

How much do you know about Partners In Health? Personally, I feel that worthwhile attempts at real improvement in public health must be framed at the level of grand strategy.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Surferbeetle

Interesting thread Madhu and i like your stone soup approach :wry:

This link might be of interest. I am told (and believe) that it is a worthwhile experience and it seems that there are many commanalities when comparing the experience (and outcomes) to that of some of our 'non-lethal' efforts.

Stop Transmission of Polio (STOP) Program

---

That link is of interest. I had to look up what "stone soup" was, though :)

@ ganulv: Honestly, a lot of the current papers I am reading seem to use the same language of modernization theory, but maybe I am seeing what I want to see?

Stuff like this:

Quote:

---

Afghanistan has the highest perinatal mortality rate in the entire world. One Afghani woman dies every 30 minutes from perinatal- related event. One of eight Afghani women will die from perinatal events. Maternal mortality is (use percentage, not fractions) 1600/100,000 vs 13 /100,000 in the United States. Afghanistan is one of the only countries in the world in which the average woman?s life expectancy is shorter than a males- despite the active, nationwide combat fought primarily by Afghani males. Meaning, women in Afghanistan are not routinely involved in combat, yet are more likely to die than a man of the same age. This article presents an alternative model Medical Seminar (MEDSEM) for a successful Special Forces (SF) medical counterinsurgency (COIN) plan that can obtain real results by addressing the mission of the Afghan Ministry of Health versus clinging to old notions. This model forms around the medical capabilities of the SF Operational Detachment (ODA)- Alpha (A) and preventinmaternal-infant complications.

---

http://www.researchgate.net/publicat...or_Afghanistan

Quote:

---

Medical programs are valuable tools when they properly align with operational objectives. In counterinsurgency operations, the medical program should promote the capacity of the host nation government and lead to greater self-sufficiency. The Medical Civic Action Program (MEDCAP) often fails to fully integrate host nation providers and officials which may undermine local medical infrastructure and rarely provides sustainable improvement. The Medical Seminar (MEDSEM) was developed during Operation Enduring Freedom- Philippines to address the shortcomings of the traditional MEDCAP. The MEDSEM greatly enhanced the MEDCAP by adding education to the venue, thereby promoting self reliance and improving the sustainability of medical interventions. Furthermore, the MEDSEM forged relationships and promoted interoperability through collaboration between local medical providers, governmental leaders, host nation forces, and U.S. Special Operations Forces.

---

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20306411

Which is quite laudable, I just don't know how it fits in with our military goals in Afghanistan. (The Philippines program seems to make more sense to me, but I don't really know about that part of the world so maybe not).

But I think at this point I am so turned around on all of this stuff that I will keep focusing on the e-learning stuff. I had not heard about Partners in Health, thanks for that link!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ganulv

Personally, I feel that worthwhile attempts at real improvement in public health must be framed at the level of grand strategy.

---

I wonder about that. A small vignette to illustrate why...

Every municipality in the Philippines has a government-run health center, or Rural Health Unit (RHU). Many of these are barely functional. The staff are underpaid and often lethargic to the point of being comatose. Medicines and equipment are routinely sold. Statistics are invented. Little or nothing gets done.

The town I now live in has the most effective RHU I've seen in this country. Same pay, same equipment, same supplies, totally different result. The staff are incredibly proactive: if a pregnant woman hasn't showed up for a checkup or a kid has missed a vaccination, they go out and find them, even if that means chasing them down in the fields or home visits after working hours. Home visits are routine, someone comes by quarterly checking blood pressure, making sure the salt is iodized (we're far from the ocean and goiter is common), checking on sanitary facilities, talking over health and nutrition issues.

Overall the system works extremely well, despite being the same system that works so poorly in so many places. That's partly because this is a tribal community, all the staff are local people, and there's a strong sense of looking after their own. It's also because the doctor in charge is a rather formidable woman of enormous competence and integrity, who tolerates no slacking and takes no scheisse from man or beast.

The lesson of the tale, to me, as that at the end of the day it's about the people. With the right people, even a flawed system can work. If the people on the implementing end aren't motivated or capable, all the grand strategy on earth will get you nowhere.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dayuhan

I wonder about that. A small vignette to illustrate why...

Every municipality in the Philippines has a government-run health center, or Rural Health Unit (RHU).

---

What you are describing sounds not unlike how health care works in rural Cuba, except that there all the docs and nurses stay on top of things. Yeah, one clinic with one good doc can make a world of difference (if sufficiently and consistently provisioned) but to make a real dent in public health issues you have to go regional and beyond. The eradication of malaria in the U.S. is an example of the scale I am talking about. The wartime Office of Malaria Control in War Areas was established in 1942 and morphed into the contemporary CDC; the National Malaria Eradication Program was an interagency effort cross-cutting jurisdictions which ran from 1947 into the early 1950s.

True, for major disease eradication programs you need the grand strategy approach... though even there the effort hinges on effective local implementation. Actually delivering effective health care at the local level requires more than that. If the Cubans can do it, and if individuals can do it in other places, it can be done, and if it can be done with limited resources in some places, it can be replicated.

Sometimes the priorities get skewed. HIV gets more attention than malaria or TB, both of which are arguably bigger problems. Even those get more attention than the combination of invisible combination of malnutrition and parasitism... invisible because it shows up in the data as death from respiratory or GI infections. Grand strategy could be useful in dealing with these problems, especially if it focused on clean water and sanitation (less sexy, alas, than eradication of dreaded diseases), but again effective local primary health care will always be the most cost-effective response.

Dayuhan hit the point exactly. The most well thought out strategy in the world will still fail if it is not properly executed at the regional/local level. There are a lot of great ideas out there that do not seem to take that into account. This is a big part of my problem when people start talking about the West and the US in particular not doing enough to "fix" this problem or that in developing world states. The solutions to many or most of these problems are at the micro, not macro level. Few states have the resources, never mind the national will, to devote to that kind of work. None that I have seen have shown any particular talent for it in any case. The idea that a Western power can come into a developing world state or region and implement a "grand strategy" that will fix their problems for them is, to borrow a phrase, a fatal conceit.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Uboat509

The most well thought out strategy in the world will still fail if it is not properly executed at the regional/local level. […] The solutions to many or most of these problems are at the micro, not macro level.

---

With the sad reversal of the effective eradication of cholera in Haiti we can see that, yes, you have to get things right at the lower levels if you want a regional or national public health initiative to succeed. But the notion that many or most public health issues is a micro issue is just incorrect. For example, what can be done about MDR–TB at the local level besides treat and isolate infected individuals?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Uboat509

The idea that a Western power can come into a developing world state or region and implement a "grand strategy" that will fix their problems for them is, to borrow a phrase, a fatal conceit.

---

I don’t disagree, but I nowhere said that the West had to be involved at all.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Uboat509

Few states have the resources, never mind the national will, to devote to that kind of work. None that I have seen have shown any particular talent for it in any case.

---

The Musevini-lead anti-HIV/AIDS campaign in Uganda is an example of success at that kind of work, and one which the West (unless you count Cuba, whose role was minor in any case, as the West) did little to formulate or execute.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dayuhan

I wonder about that. A small vignette to illustrate why...

---

This vignette also illustrates why the phrase "government-run" is often at the root of a problem, regardless of the government. Correct me if I am wrong Dayuhan, but I suspect that the reason that these RHU's fail more than they succeed is that, like most large scale government programs, there is little incentive for them to succeed and virtually no consequences for failure. The fact that they are Rural suggests that oversight is weak or non-existent. It clearly does not pay well enough to attract the best staff. The fact that the problem is so widespread also suggests that either there is no system for locals to redress problems with the government or that the system is extremely poor. If I was to hazard a guess, I bet that there are occasional (say, around election season) high profile cases where one of these RHU's is investigated and perhaps someone is fired or goes to jail but overall little changes because there is either a lack of incentive or a lack of resources to change things, or a combination of both. When the system is broken that leaves it up to individuals to fix things locally. Dayuhan is fortunate that the head of his local RHU is not only competent and strong willed enough to run an effective clinic but is also willing to do so for a paycheck that does not seem to have attracted the best of her peers to other clinics. That is an extremely rare thing.
This is not meant to be a dig at the government of the Philippines or developing world states specifically. It applies to rich-world states as well. Governments, no matter how well intentioned, tend to be poor stewards of large scale social programs (surprise).

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ganulv

With the sad reversal of the effective eradication of cholera in Haiti we can see that, yes, you have to get things right at the lower levels if you want a regional or national public health initiative to succeed. But the notion that many or most public health issues is a micro issue is just incorrect. For example, what can be done about MDR–TB at the local level besides treat and isolate infected individuals?

---

The government can provide the drugs or the vaccines or the treated insect nets but it is up to the local providers to implement protocols, treat patients and distribute medical supplies. Dayuhan's vignette is a perfect example of that. If the local provider is simply selling the supplies and equipment that the government provides then the plan fails. Please do not misunderstand me. I am not saying that these problems are only at the micro level. I am simply saying that you cannot ignore the micro level.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ganulv

I don’t disagree, but I nowhere said that the West had to be involved at all.

---

Sorry. That was not aimed at you. I was speaking generally because there are a lot of people who do make that complaint. I did not mean to imply that you had.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Uboat509

The government can provide the drugs or the vaccines or the treated insect nets but it is up to the local providers to implement protocols, treat patients and distribute medical supplies.

---

True, and though increased oversight is no magic bullet (I say that mostly because I do not believe in magic bullets) you (by which I mean “me”) have to wonder if the government isn’t somehow willfully part of the fraud if no reasonable effort in the area of oversight is being made.

I would feel remiss if I did not mention that this sort of thing comes in an American flavor that most of us are unaware of.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ganulv

True, and though increased oversight is no magic bullet (I say that mostly because I do not believe in magic bullets) you (by which I mean “me”) have to wonder if the government isn’t somehow willfully part of the fraud if no reasonable effort in the area of oversight is being made.

---

It is never out of the realm of possibility but Ken White has a great quote that I cannot find now that says something to the effect of "Never attribute to malice what can be easily attributed to incompetence." Lack of oversight can be caused by a number of different things. It can be a regulator who is complicit with illegal activities at the local level. It can be a lazy and/or overworked regulator. It can be a regulator that lacks an effective regulatory mandate to actually be effective. It can also be an incompetent regulator. It can also be a lack of funding to have enough regulators to cover all the locations. It can also be a combination of several of these things together.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ganulv

I would feel remiss if I did not mention that this sort of thing comes in an American flavor that most of us are unaware of.

---

There is absolutely no doubt that our bloated social programs have problems.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Uboat509

It is never out of the realm of possibility but Ken White has a great quote that I cannot find now that says something to the effect of "Never attribute to malice what can be easily attributed to incompetence."

---

I don’t know about malicious, but when your job is to stem fraud and the best you (as an institution, and the higher-ups within it) can do is throw up your hands and say, “What else can we do?!?” I kind of think you yourself are acting fraudulently. But that’s a discussion for a dedicated Ethics thread. :)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Uboat509

This vignette also illustrates why the phrase "government-run" is often at the root of a problem, regardless of the government. Correct me if I am wrong Dayuhan, but I suspect that the reason that these RHU's fail more than they succeed is that, like most large scale government programs, there is little incentive for them to succeed and virtually no consequences for failure. The fact that they are Rural suggests that oversight is weak or non-existent. It clearly does not pay well enough to attract the best staff. The fact that the problem is so widespread also suggests that either there is no system for locals to redress problems with the government or that the system is extremely poor. If I was to hazard a guess, I bet that there are occasional (say, around election season) high profile cases where one of these RHU's is investigated and perhaps someone is fired or goes to jail but overall little changes because there is either a lack of incentive or a lack of resources to change things, or a combination of both. When the system is broken that leaves it up to individuals to fix things locally. Dayuhan is fortunate that the head of his local RHU is not only competent and strong willed enough to run an effective clinic but is also willing to do so for a paycheck that does not seem to have attracted the best of her peers to other clinics. That is an extremely rare thing.
This is not meant to be a dig at the government of the Philippines or developing world states specifically. It applies to rich-world states as well. Governments, no matter how well intentioned, tend to be poor stewards of large scale social programs (surprise).

---

All of this is true, but in many cases there are few alternatives to government management of rural health, especially in developing countries. There's little money in it, and few health care professionals are willing to stick with providing GP and primary health care services out in the countryside when the "good life" in the city beckons. It's not only a problem in the developing world; even in modern countries there's real shortage of physicians in many rural communities. In the absence of material incentive (or the presence of much greater incentives elsewhere) it's difficult to find a fully private sector solution.

Of course there are systems here for oversight, but the systems, like most systems in the Philippine government, often aren't implemented with any great vigor. In much of this country there's an established culture of complacency, self-service, and corruption in government service, and those who actually want to do something find themselves slogging through a morass of bureaucratic inertia.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ganulv

I would feel remiss if I did not mention that this sort of thing comes in an American flavor that most of us are unaware of.

---

Only to have the Health Insurance bureaucracy come down on me like a ton of bricks, in essence telling me to sue, bring criminal charges or shut up in order for them to justify their over priced premiums...

Calling the Guvmint's Fraud Waste and Abuse hotline resulted in more of the same. No one flat said "we know and we like it that way..." but it was rather apparent that was the attitude.

One complaint was over an orthotic brace for my wife, an item that can be purchased for about $50.00 in most Medical Supply Stores or on the internet-- we paid about $85, the insurance company over $300... :rolleyes:

Hanlon's razor, "Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity" doesn't apply -- the health care industry isn't stupid and, while not truly malicious, they sure aren't straight arrows...

Medicine is not a speciality I am familiar with, but reading this thread and mindful of the history that supplying medical care in COIN is often described as a "win, win" option two thoughts came to mind:

a) traditionally IIRC medical care was given on an individual basis, with the host community being aware of what that meant and with very rarely was care given beyond the "village" or local community

b) today there is an emphasis on public health, e.g. clean water and on somewhat sophisticated medical care, way beyond local comprehension, local affordability and out of community sight, e.g. helicopter evacuation to Camp bastion's hospital for an IED injured child

It seems to me that in 'stability operations' we have adapted the traditional approach, which was kept small and in view, added the far more effective public health option - which may not be locally seen as benign and offered medical care that is simply too much.

This issue also appears in civil / NGO provision in medical emergencies, notably after disasters and natural failures, drought comes to mind.

Now back to my "armchair".

Leaving aside for a moment the relationship to counterinsurgency and allowing me to oversimplify a bit: with public health-related projects greater avoided costs over the long term are associated with greater upfront costs. Rational planning of a public health-related project should begin by asking whether avoiding cost over time is the raison d'être. If the answer is “yes,” the next question should be whether meeting the upfront costs is feasible (not a purely financial matter, as there are political and social realities to take into consideration).

Returning to the issue of counterinsurgency, is there real evidence that providing healthcare is a successful means of winning hearts and minds?* I’m not trying to be a troll here but rather am seriously asking whether the concept can truly be said to rise above the level of assertion.

*Note that my question is not whether providing access to healthcare improves quality of life. I am taking that for granted.

Ganulv posted:

Quote:

---

Returning to the issue of counterinsurgency, is there real evidence that providing healthcare is a successful means of winning hearts and minds?* I’m not trying to be a troll here but rather am seriously asking whether the concept can truly be said to rise above the level of assertion.

---

Certainly in my reading on the campaign in Malaya and especially Oman there are references to the impact of providing basic medical aid in locations that had none.

My impression is that basic medical aid - in Oman - helped secure the loyalty of local people as proof the new Sultan cared before more extensive and expensive options arrived, such as building roads.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by davidbfpo

My impression is that basic medical aid - in Oman - helped secure the loyalty of local people as proof the new Sultan cared before more extensive and expensive options arrived, such as building roads.

---

I don’t know the first thing about that conflict, can you recommend a reading or viewing for beginners? It would be interesting to see whether the initial medical aid was meant to be—or at least to be perceived as—the first step towards a long term medical infrastructure (as opposed to medics periodically showing up to pull teeth and hand out quinine).

Ganulv,

You asked two questions:

Quote:

---

I don’t know the first thing about that conflict, can you recommend a reading or viewing for beginners?

---

If you search SWC on Dhofar (the province) and Oman there are many posts, but for a reading list - not on medicine - there is this now merged thread:

Quote:

---

It would be interesting to see whether the initial medical aid was meant to be—or at least to be perceived as—the first step towards a long term medical infrastructure (as opposed to medics periodically showing up to pull teeth and hand out quinine).

---

My recollection is that medicine appears as a phrase, maybe a sentence and not in detail. It is a long time since I've done any reading on the campaign, so perhaps a Google search might find new sources.

Here are some other references and sites that I've dug up. No idea if they will be helpful or not. I have no affiliation with the following, but the links seem interesting:


1. Afghanmed.org - Afghan Medical Organization of America

2. TATRC (tatrc.org) - telemedicine

3.

Quote:

---

MEDCAP operations recently returned to activity in Iraq and Afghanistan. They started in a rather improvised way before integrating into a strategy aimed to “win hearts and minds.” Whereas their impact on the health of the population remains unknown, military health authorities have been rather enthusiastic about their impact on the perception of the US military by the local population (Cascells 2009). In 2009 the approach developed into a new concept, the Medical Stability Operations (MSOs), which would build on the experience of MEDCAP in a more professional and effective way (Pueschel, 2009). Recognizing the limits of MEDCAP, the new strategy seeks to learn from this experience and to collaborate with humanitarian organizations (SOMA conference, 2009). In order to facilitate collaboration with humanitarian actors, the US military forces have created a guide covering its interaction with NGOs: “The guide shows how the military can work with NGOs that may not want to be perceived as being aligned with people in uniform on the ground” (US DoD, Jan. 2010).

---

http://www.doctorswithoutborders.org...at=perceptions

4. http://icsr.info/blog/Short-Circuiting-Taliban-Media

5. http://www.globalmedicine.org/GMN/index.asp

6. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/0...n_1344877.html

Quote:

---

The aptly named Jungle School of Medicine Kawthoolei may be a far cry from what Westerners would typically consider an advanced school and medical clinic.

Both structures were built by the local Karen villagers using locally grown resources. Blankets on the floor take the place of clinical beds, and instead of desks students complete assignments on metal folding tables. But the facility's very existence means access to a level of health care and health education that was desperately needed.

---

7. http://www.ramcjournal.com/past_2011.html (in particular, International Military Medical Engagement with the Indigenous Health Sector - Afghan Security Forces Medical Services, Bricknell, Grigson)

8. http://www.centcom.mil/news/coalitio...-combat-medics

9. http://gh.websedgemedia.com/conferen...r_afghanistan/

The link goes directly to audio!!!!

Quote:

---

Global Health TV's Stephen Horn talks with Shainoor Khoja, Director of Corporate Affairs at Afghan telecommunications company, Roshan. Khoja, shares her experiences establishing telemedicine and micro-financing initiatives and explains how these ideas can help other developing countries.

---

10. http://afghanistan.usaid.gov/en/USAI...cal_University

Higher Education Project Kabul Medical University

11. http://www.jsomonline.org/Publicatio...7148Keenan.pdf

Role of Medicine in Supporting Special Forces Counter-Insurgency Operations in Southern Afghanistan

12. And finally, because I think it matters as background:

https://globalsociology.pbworks.com/...Stratification

Modernization theory and development stuff. I keep being told no one believes in such a linear process anymore, except it still seems to form a sort of basis for some of our interaction with other nations. Help, other council members! Am I off-base with this line of thinking?

http://tinyurl.com/8yhbpxw

(Modernization and Medical Care, Sociological Perspective, Gallagher E, 1988)

Quote:

---

The introduction of modern medicine into developing societies is an important topic for social-scientific analysis. Here I draw upon modernization theory to illuminate this topic. Using Peter Berger's notion of "carriers of modernity," I discuss health care as such a carrier. Compared with premodern modes of health care, modern health care has a calculable, "commodity" character. Its production has become a major and increasingly systematized sector of the economy. In addition to its manifest clinical benefits, health care conveys the symbolic meanings of modernity. It participates in the broad though uneven passage of technology and values from Western societies to metropolitan areas in developing societies and thence to the hinterland. Health care as the focus of demodernization strains is also examined, through case examples drawn from Amish and Islamic contexts.

---

Again, this is not an area I know very well so the references and links I provide are for discussion and education. I have more links that might be of interest and will post as time permits. I am a forever SKEPTIC on the third party development game, but it doesn't hurt to study and learn what can be studied and learned....or something like that.

Oh, and because I've seemed to have gone off in a different direction from my original comments, an abstract on online medical curriculums:

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2823389/

Quote:

---

The National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI) and the National Coalition for Health Professional Education in Genetics (NCHPEG) have expressed the need for the education of physicians about the ethical, legal and social implications (ELSI) related to genetic testing and counseling. To help address this need, we have developed and assessed an Internet-based curriculum to educate medical students about topics related to the ELSI associated with genetic testing and counseling. We developed content and interactive features for five core modules and evaluated their effect on students' knowledge, attitudes, self-efficacy and intended behavior. Statistically significant increases in knowledge and positive changes in attitude, self-efficacy and intended behavior were observed in all these studies. We believe that this web-based curriculum is a valuable supplement to typical medical school genetics coursework and an effective means of teaching students about ELSI associated with genetic testing and counseling. The modules are available online for review by the general public for free and for use by medical student groups at a nominal charge at www.GeneticSolutions.com.

---

So, my basic point in linking the above is that lots of stuff is already available online and for free, so if anyone wants to adapt a cell phone medical curriculum or translate it to radio or whatever, the material is already out there. Tons and tons and tons of it.

No need to re-invent the wheel, yada yada yada.

Found other sites of interest, don't know a thing about any of it, but as examples:

http://medicalcurriculum.com/

http://www.acpmedicine.com/acpmedici...wc_prog.action

Quote:

---

The ACP Medicine Weekly Curriculum is a convenient email-based program that guides residents through an ongoing study of the key elements of internal medicine and patient care from ACP Medicine, an official publication of the American College of Physicians. The program is simple and economical. Each week, program directors and their residents receive an email alerting them that the new Weekly Curriculum has been published live online. The email contains a tip and goals relating to a chapter and questions published in ACP Medicine. The email also contains a link to the chapter. Residents review the chapter, click on the convenient ACP Medicine link in the email to access the ACP Medicine Web site (provided to you and all your residents as part of your Weekly Curriculum subscription). There they access the Weekly Curriculum tab at the top of the screen, and enter their user name and password. The residents take the weekly test online and receive immediate feedback on their scores, with detailed discussions of the topics and the answers, as well as access to the full text of the related chapters for additional review.

---

Okay, one more for now and then I'll give it a rest for a bit:

Quote:

---

This is the second in a series of three papers that examine the role of international military medical services in stability operations in unstable countries. The paper discusses security sector reform in general terms and highlights the interdependency of the armed forces, police, judiciary and penal systems in creating a ‘secure environment’. The paper then looks at components of a local military medical system for a counter-insurgency campaign operating on interior lines and the contribution and challenges faced by the international military medical community in supporting the development of this system. Finally the paper highlights the importance of planning the medical support of the international military personnel who will be supporting wider aspects of security sector reform. The paper is based on background research and my personal experience as Medical Director in the Headquarters of the NATO International Stability Assistance Force in Afghanistan in 2006.

---

http://www.ramcjournal.com/2007/jun07/bricknell.pdf

So, what happens to the brick-and-mortar once we can't be there or funding dries up? That's why I'm interested in the stuff that's already available, so to speak.

There is a fair amount of educational "medical tourism" to neighboring countries and other countries, too.

http://www.afghana.com/SocietyAndCul...sociations.htm

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Madhu

Modernization theory and development stuff. I keep being told no one believes in such a linear process anymore, except it still seems to form a sort of basis for some of our interaction with other nations. Help, other council members! Am I off-base with this line of thinking?

---

O país do futuro! E sempre será. The fact that the term “Developing World” continues to be used despite decades of evidence to the contrary says more about the nature of belief than it does about the validity of modernization theory, if you ask me. :rolleyes:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ganulv

O pas do futuro! E sempre ser. The fact that the term Developing World continues to be used despite decades of evidence to the contrary says more about the nature of belief than it does about the validity of modernization theory, if you ask me. :rolleyes:

---

Anyway,

A medical stability operations curriculum development program exists, apparently, but I know nothing about it. Anyone else know something useful? Bueller? Bueller? (Does anyone under a certain age even recognize the reference?)

Quote:

---

The Medical Stability Operations Curriculum Development Program (MSOC) was created to develop an educational program for the U.S. Military, United States Governmental (USG) inter-agency partners, and partner and host nations as identified by the geographical Combatant Commands (COCOMs). This program will be a collaboration and partnership between the Uniformed Services University through the Center for Disaster and Humanitarian Assistance Medicine (USU/CDHAM) and Defense Medical Readiness Training Institute (DMRTI)

---

I don't mean to pick on anyone, but there sure are a lot of different acronym-groupings on that site....

http://www.cdham.org/medical-stabili...t-program-msoc

More on cell phone medicine:

Quote:

---

Yesterday was my first day at work on my new job with Urb.Im:

---

http://zenpundit.com/?p=12047

Quote:

---

M-chanjo: Saving lives by mixing health care with mobile technology

The project's name is M-chanjo, and its aim is to harness the power of mobile phones — ownership of which has increased tenfold over the last ten years in Kenya — to keep patients up to date on their upcoming inoculations and on any outreach programs that are due to take place in the area.

---

and

Quote:

---

Ushirika medical clinic, which serves several thousands of people monthly, aims to provide quality and affordable health care to the community members. In addition to the clinic's emphasis on curing illness, its staff also is deeply involved in disease prevention.

---

http://urb.im/nr/120729mc

I am sure the VA has similar pilot programs? Teaching hospitals in the states are very, very good at some things, but they move at the pace of a snail in terms of envisioning something really radical in terms of the delivery of health care. At least, that's been my experience. Much of it has to do with established stakeholders and the rest with a health care policy literature and attitudes stuck in the mid twentieth century. Like so many others. Just why is there such intellectual stagnation here, there, and everywhere, institutionally speaking? Or am I being unfair?

Madhu asked:

Quote:

---

Just why is there such intellectual stagnation here, there, and everywhere, institutionally speaking? Or am I being unfair?

---

This maybe trite, it is alas very accurate: Jack be nimble, Jack be quick.

Curious that the example given is in Kenya, which has started a number of ground-breaking uses of IT, in finance and information sharing, alongside a paucity of public capital and increasing demand for public services.

We in the 'developed' world are rarely nimble, let alone quick. I cannot recall the details now, two sports stadium in London were recently built, one for a public body took years longer than another built for a privately-owned football club.

Military Medical Assets as Counterinsurgency Force Multipliers: A Call to Action

Entry Excerpt:



--------
Read the full post and make any comments at the SWJ Blog.
This forum is a feed only and is closed to user comments.

Military Medical Assets as Counterinsurgency Force Multipliers: A Call to Action

Entry Excerpt:



--------
Read the full post and make any comments at the SWJ Blog.
This forum is a feed only and is closed to user comments.

Iraq and Afghanistan through the Lens of American Military Casualties

An important SWJ Blog link that needs to sit here, especially due to the information on casualties.