Pet Peeve - Trying to Apply M&S to Small Wars Issues
Educate me if you can, I have seen quite a bit of effort by the modeling and simulation community (and resources applied to the same) in an attempt to come to grips with insurgents, terrorists, and non-combatants (local population). To me, human behavior - cultural intelligence is one part (not the only) – is the key to winning Small Wars.
I remain unconvinced that the M&S community will ever produce an intelligence agent capable of aiding our efforts here. Now the “buzz” word is “enemy intentions”. Really now, can we model this – I don’t believe the murderous thugs actually know their own intentions on a week to week basis. More like “commander’s intent” – decentralized operations and taking advantage of targets and events of opportunity.
IMHO, the money spent here would be better utilzed at the "boots on the ground" level - tactical needs for the troops and creating a "tactical" interagency capability.
Am I missing something? Please comment...
FAOs, Thinking, and Theory
Dave,
As a liberal arts major by instinct and training--history and anthropology--I too view techie solutions with jaundiced ideas. I saw the same as an intel officer; MI has never met a collection system it did not want but will take take the need for trained analysts to heart. Why? Because you can throw money at it and offer immediate measurable results such as "we fielded so many systems, etc".
One has great difficulty in modeling human behavior even when you specialize in it. As a long term FAO, you will never, ever hear me describe myself as an expert on a target culture. I specialized in the Middle East and Africa. There are NO experts on foreign cultures; to be an expert you have to be a native speaker/native thinker. That combination presents its own challenges: you are part of the problem trying to devise a solution. In discussing cultural sensitivity, I coach O/Cs here to keep it in perspective; cultural sensitivity will assist in the mission. It is NOT the mission. I teach 2 fundamentals: A. Understand that they do not think like you do (due to influences involving culture and language); and B.They have an agenda in everything they do with you. I tell folks they must first underatnd those premises if they wish to A Understand their thinking and B. Anticipate their agenda, the real goals for cultural sensitivity. All of that plays into the idea of teaching soldiers to think, versus following a scripted playbook.
Finally I would also say that in modeling human behavior and dealing with foreign cultures, only APPLIED exeprience counts. Relating to the idea of "experts," many describe themselves as experts on various societies when their experience is purely academic. We used to have a number of dual track FAOs who never really got into their regions; I put them in the same category as those academics. Both have enough theoretical experience to be truly dangerous.
best
Tom Odom