Roads are like most other inanimate objects; they have
benefits and detriments and sensible application of those strengths and weaknesses is key. Afghanistan suffers from the fact that a number of policy makers from a number of well intentioned (and some not so well...) nations are doing something they have not done before and thus are feeling their way and making some -- or a lot of -- mistakes along the way. That was and is to be expected and tolerated.
Add to that problem the fact that there are a fairly large number of those nations who espouse different approaches and have different international and domestic priorities and you have all the makings of ill applied policies and arguments over nits. We see that daily...
That's a long way of saying that Kilcullen and Foust are both correct in their assertions. Which will end up being correct in the end result is dependent upon the policies, use and ancillary efforts applied to those inanimate objects over the next few years. Obviously, the opposition(s) get(s) a vote as well.
In Afghanistan for many centuries, the 'winner' in conflicts has been he with the most will. I suspect that will not change, so how does this turn out?
Too early to tell. ;)
COIN is not - or should never be - orthodox.
Every COIN situation is different and orthodoxy leads to failure. Most people involved in the actual practice know that or learn it real quick.
Warfare, like anything else, is subject to fads. So, I guess you mean it short circuits the current fads and bloviation, much of which is aimed simply at pointing people in a direction they have not traveled before. For the military or government practitioner that has the benefit of providing a reasonable base of acquired knowledge on which to base sensible and METT-TC derived solutions -- most of which will not follow the 'orthodoxy' and will transcend the fad and bloviation factors. In any specific combat situation, the METT-TC factors overrule all else; he who succumbs to norms and orthodox solutions will get quickly clobbered.
For the casual observer and armchair punter, OTOH, it's fodder for a lot of nebulous argument. That is a benefit because fads and orthodoxy should always be challenged. As Foust does.
Read much of the stuff there, like those roads, some pluses, some minuses... :D
Stabilizing effect of building roads
Andrew Wilder suggests that there is not apparent stabilizing effect of road building being conducted by PRTs. James Fearon argues that in terms if a counterinsurgency campaign better roads increase the counterinsurgents ability to exert government control.
http://www.foreignpolicy.com/article..._love?page=0,0
Wilder makes a few interesting points such as how the road building fuels corruption while not addressing basic governance issues or security needs.
There is no security on the road - close to Kabul
I knew there was an old thread on road-building, but it took time to locate.
Taken from within a BBC News report 'Taliban's Ghorband valley stronghold two hours from Kabul', which has many points on COIN and Afghanistan, there was this, slightly edited:
Quote:
In the local market, we meet some taxi drivers, who commute daily from Ghorband.
We are happy and thankful to the foreigners for asphalting the 100km Ghorband-Kabul road...The valley can now supply the entire city of Kabul with apricots, apples and almonds. But we do this risking our lives every day...There is no security on the road. Armed robbers stop us, beat us and snatch our money and goods. Local police are harrassing people. They demand money and food.
Looks like building this road has not helped, construction without security and so close to Kabul too.
Link:http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-19080234
Breakup Of A Man And Woman Family
As I beat my dead horse again:wry:Cultures certainly matter and what is true in the West may not work at all in other places. But based on my experience it is the breakup of a traditional Man and Woman marriage-family structure. I know it is not popular or politically correct but whenever you violate the purpose of a system (and a family is a system) you are asking for trouble. In contrast when you do things to strengthen or reinforce a system the results will tend to be more along the lines of what you expected.
I think I told this story on another thread. When I was a kid and went to church on Sunday it was a good bet that I or my friends would be next to some of the richest people and some of the poorest people and it did not matter to anyone nor would you be treated any different, Yes Republicans and Democrats actually went to and sat beside each other in the same church and........often had Sunday dinner together afterwords:eek: It isn't like that anymore:(We have lost a great deal of what made this country great,I just hope we can get it back.