Why False Enemy Propaganda Matters: German Jihadi Motivated by Fake US Soldier Rape V

http://mypetjawa.mu.nu/archives/206637.php

Quote:

---

We have got to do better at fighting the propaganda produced by the enemy. Which is why I support YouTube smackdown. But we need to do more. We need to organize. And not simply at the individual private level. Fighting enemy propaganda needs to be higher on the priority list of both the CIA and the DOD.

---

Who in DOD fights enemy propaganda?

Does EUCOM do any kind of counterpropaganda that might mitigate the effect enemy propaganda has on Kosovars in the German domestic target audience?

I've read a bunch of stuff about Pakistani attitudes towards America recently, and I've been shocked by the level of lies that people just take for granted there. It's simply amazing to see what people who have what are obviously otherwise fairly decent intentions can be duped into believing. If I had not seen the same type of phenomenon at far lesser levels elsewhere I would have had trouble believing what I've been seeing.

This situation is truly reaching crisis proportions. We have got to do more about it, and enlist our Pakistani allies in the effort as well. The US like every other country in the world isn't perfect, but the truth is so far removed from the fictions the average Pakistani citizen is surrounded by that it's stunning.

The effort has to be one of both civil diplomacy & military diplomacy. At this point there's quite obviously no place for any of the stakeholders to go but up.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Cannoneer No. 4

http://mypetjawa.mu.nu/archives/206637.php



Who in DOD fights enemy propaganda?

Does EUCOM do any kind of counterpropaganda that might mitigate the effect enemy propaganda has on Kosovars in the German domestic target audience?

---

Who fights enemy propaganda?

The stupidest and the worst.

Anyone who has been around I/O and PAO in ISAF and IJC notes the large amount of relieved and rejected bottom-feeders who inhabit both fields of work.

The Navy sends ship commanders to IJC to be in charge of I/O on 30 day tours. A continuous parade of clueless Naval O-6s, who know how to run an aircraft carrier, or cruiser, but do not even have time to completely inprocess before they are farewelled and replaced by the next 30 day loser.

The people who run ISAF PAO/IO amaze one that they can actually breathe and walk at the same time. Helicopter pilots, Armor officers, Marine field grades and a large proportion of idiotic Air Force and Naval personnel who have zero experience in ground warfare, IO/PAO or in Afghanistan inhabit those billets.

And it only gets worse out in the RCs.

And at best, our PAO/IO is reactive in nature. The recipe is thus: SF morons go out and Hellfire or JDAM some "bad guys" (usually without anyone considering what kind of bad guy they are), TB accuses us of murdering babies, and we deny it ever happened. Then we admit it happened, later, but deny we killed anyone. Then we admit later we killed a bad guy, but deny we killed babies. Then we are forced to apologize for killing babies, whether we did or not, because our PAO/IO morons and or moronic SF idiots failed to have a plan for dealing with the fallout, WHICH HAPPENS EVERY F*CKING TIME!!!!

No wonder the rest of the world believes what the bad guys say and think we are a bunch of liars.

10 years of moronitude, repeated often. How stupid an non-learning can an organization be?

I never thought I was some kind of Wiley Coyote "SUPER-genius", but the solution seems pretty simple and straightforward to me.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by anonamatic

This situation is truly reaching crisis proportions. We have got to do more about it, and enlist our Pakistani allies in the effort as well. The US like every other country in the world isn't perfect, but the truth is so far removed from the fictions the average Pakistani citizen is surrounded by that it's stunning.

---

Which Pakistanis truly are our allies?

Can Americans really tell allied Pakistanis from Osama-loving, Christian-hating, taqqiyah-spewing, diplomatic immunity-violating, fuel truck-burning lying SOBs pretending to be allies?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by 120mm

Who fights enemy propaganda?

The stupidest and the worst.

---

Ouch. Not necessarily taking up for the OEF/ISAF counterpropaganda effort, but the perception of this interested civilian has been managed or mismanaged in such a way as to lead me to question the effectiveness of EUCOM's, Germany's, and America's counterpropaganda effort.

http://internet-haganah.com/harchive...91.html#007191

Quote:

---

The Frankfurt shooter's Facebook page, and a little color commentary

The jihadi who shot four US service members in Frankfurt yesterday, killing two, left behind a Facebook account and 127 friends.

The shooter, Arid Uka AKA Abu Rayyan, may have acted alone. He certainly was the only person on the scene with a gun, shooting and killing. His radical associations online should put to rest any thought that he was a genuinely unconnected lone wolf.

---

Is it possible that Uka had no significant meat space contact with any violent Islamist supremacists?

Could Uka have convinced himself of the righteousness of killing American airmen based solely on what he saw on the internet?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by anonamatic

I've read a bunch of stuff about Pakistani attitudes towards America recently, and I've been shocked by the level of lies that people just take for granted there. It's simply amazing to see what people who have what are obviously otherwise fairly decent intentions can be duped into believing. If I had not seen the same type of phenomenon at far lesser levels elsewhere I would have had trouble believing what I've been seeing.

This situation is truly reaching crisis proportions. We have got to do more about it, and enlist our Pakistani allies in the effort as well. The US like every other country in the world isn't perfect, but the truth is so far removed from the fictions the average Pakistani citizen is surrounded by that it's stunning.

The effort has to be one of both civil diplomacy & military diplomacy. At this point there's quite obviously no place for any of the stakeholders to go but up.

---

Considering the permanent peak season for myths, partisan propaganda, tinfoil hats and conspiracy theories in the U.S. itself I'm not sure it's a bug. It might be a feature.

How many Americans believe that Obama is a Kenya-born Muslim again? 30%?
Sounds to me like you need to do homework first and maybe outsource information campaigns in distant places to others.

http://www.nationalreview.com/articl...k-steyn?page=1

Multiculturalism says he’s as German as Helmut and Franz. Except he’s not.

Quote:

---

Why isn’t he a fully functioning citizen of the nation he’s spent his entire life in?

---

Quote:

---

Today, the Muslim world starts in the suburbs of Frankfurt.

---

Even if it was true (and don't get me started on where Latin America begins if we use this logic):

Yesterday I walked to a local supermarket for some food. In thoughts I was a bit angry that I wore only a thin leather jacket, for it was already dark and quite cold.


A Turkish-looking ~15 year old guy was in front of me and greeted two girls who just had left a bus. They walked a few metres ahead of me and he offered and gave his jacket to the girl with the thinner clothes. He was down to a T-shirt, close to freezing temperature.

Does this mean the world of brown-looking people gentlemen manners begins in Cologne?


I'm inclined to consider both to be anecdotes in a world of almost seven billion people.

There's a big problem in this sort of thing. Americans, like other cultures that developed out of the European Enlightenment, believe in an objective truth that is separate from whoever is perceiving it. Hence we assume all that we need to do is communicate "ground truth" in order to counter propaganda.

In other cultures, truth has more of an affinity component. In other words, who is telling the story matters greatly. The closer someone is to you, the more validity you ascribe to what they say. Hence a family member has a lot of validity, someone from the same village or clan a little less, then other affinities--tribe, ethnicity, sect, religion, etc.

Neither of these ways of assessing information is inherently right or wrong. But they are different.

This is the reason that U.S. IO in non-Western cultures has limitations. There are thousands of instances where the U.S. blamed for someone by local people and provides physical evidence that it was not responsible, but still is blamed because the person placing the blame on the Americans had some form of affinity with their audience.

What all this means is that the idea that if the US did a better job at IO or was better organized it would be more effective is basically a myth. We are always going to have a serious credibility problem. That is simply part of the psychological terrain we operate in as much as a mountain range is part of the physical terrain. As with a mountain range, we need to focus on work-arounds rather than "solutions."

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Fuchs

Considering the permanent peak season for myths, partisan propaganda, tinfoil hats and conspiracy theories in the U.S. itself I'm not sure it's a bug. It might be a feature.

How many Americans believe that Obama is a Kenya-born Muslim again? 30%?
Sounds to me like you need to do homework first and maybe outsource information campaigns in distant places to others.

---

Hey I don't pretend for a second that I have a clue about this. Not about fixing it, not about what all the problems are, not about even the potential for it. In fact, part of what got me to this site was that I needed to start learning things to deal with dipwad dilettantes who play at this sort of crap in very destructive ways for personal gain. So don't even start giving me crap about this it's totally uncalled for. Ask me about breaking into computers and freakishly hard technical stuff associated with that, and the stupid crap egoistic hacker wannabes can get into, and I can hold my own with anyone. Ask me about IO & propaganda stuff though dealing with regional concerns & revolutionary sedition in combat zones, and I'll hit a wall pretty quick. I at least know some of where I'm dumb and don't need you getting pissy and pretentious at me to inform me of that.

And yea, there are some real idiots in the US, and other idiots who want to lie to those idiots for craven short term personal gain. That, like every other place in the world though, is not the whole story and you know it. So put a sock in the equivocation.

I consulted foreign companies on how to enter the German market a few years ago. A standard advice was to first succeed in the home market before entering a more difficult foreign market.

The U.S. society and government cannot keep a fifth to a third of U.S. adults from misunderstanding very basic political things or even from believing outright lies. The chances of succeeding in the same in a distant place despite the failure at home is 'remote'. It doesn't take any special circumstances in said distant place to ruin the chances.

That while sound advice isn't always true either. If it was well China would still be nearly completely agrarian. In the US it would probably be useful if the fairness doctrine for the media was reintroduced.

Throwing stones at the least amongst those in the US is not at all useful in solving problems that are not going to be fixed by dealing with that separate problem.

Coming from someone living in what is perhaps the worlds largest glass house, I'd perhaps be more inclined to entertain witless rock throwing when I stop having to pay for, and be woken up every night by road work that's designed to undo the mess of a major roadway where I live that had to be designed to put a turn at grenade range for it's entire length. Your criticism of me, and of the moronic percentage of the population in the US is not at all appropriate. Unless you want me to start going down a really nasty road of fault finding with modern domestic Germany and whatever shots I decide to entertain myself with taking at you personally, I respectfully suggest you try to speak to the topic of the thread.

I don't think the problem with German jihad is anymore the fault of people in Germany than is the very same issue when it occurs in the US. If you somehow were thinking that I was supporting such a witless notion, you'd be mistaken. The problem with that lies at it's base with the activities of the Taliban & Al-Qaeda. What people in other countries are seeing is a result of those obviously very successful efforts on their part. The rest of us have got to step up our game. My only suggestion beyond that & some demonstrations of alarm over just how awful the situation is have been that it can't be led by just the civil side, or just the military side of the US government.

I don't think for a second that all Pakistanis think that the US & Europe are filled with baby raping monsters, but I am damned concerned about the country falling to extremists. At this point I think it's safe to say that the US would prefer to have had nothing to do with Afghanistan, Pakistan, or much of that region at all. They did pick a fight with us though, and they aren't going to stop either, so no matter how dumb we are as a nation percentage wise, we're stuck dealing with them.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Fuchs

How many Americans believe that Obama is a Kenya-born Muslim again? 30%?

---

How many German Interior Ministers believe Islam in Germany is not something substantiated by history at any point? 100%

My problem with "islamophobia" is that it tends to be too general and ill-informed. There are Islamic groups with extremely violent intentions and then there are dozens of other political causes that make common cause with these groups for various reasons, or that fight against them for various reasons. Islam itself if not a person. Individual persons hold on to one of several versions of Islam and these versions are not set in stone, they are products of history and evolve with time (for better and for worse). Anyway, the simplified approach is simple to remember but not too useful in detail. More nuance may be needed, otherwise you end up with nonsense like "Obama is a secret Muslim Manchurian candidate"...which may be a useful way to get a few votes, but is really unhelpful in identifying real threats or dealing with them...
Just saying.
Btw, you may find my last comments on the Raymond Davis case relevant to this discussion.

Steve, I am not sure I get your point. The European enlightenment (which some Europeans are still fighting against...see Glenn Beck for details) was, in my opinion, a great step forward in human thought, but its a moving target (e.g. the postmodern woo spewing out of European Universities is also a product of that enlightenment, though a mostly undesirable one in my opinion) and just like Europeans adopted some good ideas from elsewhere when needed, others are adopting features (and bugs) of the enlightenment even as we speak.
Anyway, my point is not that all cultures are the same. They are obviously not. But its always worth keeping in mind that all cultures are in motion and features and bugs both exceed the capacity of any simple formulation to sum up. People in the US are not free of bias in favor of authorities they know and trust and people in Afghanistan do have an idea of "objective truth"....

The internet is a free for all and how the U.S. Government or its military services could counteract all of the misinformation on it would be a massive challenge. Hypothetically speaking, though, the worst that appears there might be triaged into a weekly "Dirty Dozen List" of particularly egregious slurs that could be rebutted or proven to be wrong. Perhaps this might be a new mission area for Voice of America.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by 120mm

Who fights enemy propaganda?

The stupidest and the worst.

---

120mm ... Thank you. Thank you very much ;)
Great post over on the DIME blog as a result of the latest RS shenanigans that I now have printed above my desk in full view of the Combat Engineer and Signaller who run my life. Apparently the theory is that attendance at senior school as a generalist equips them for a posting in my world while my poor-arse mustang specialist career and supporting specialist qualifications means I could not possibly have any idea on how to actually do this. Moreover given my background I obviously cannot write appropriately and therefore everything I do which is designed to be easily understood by most gets 'militarified' in a clearance process that only looks for staff duties. I encourage you all consider Matt's post as well ;)

Quote:

---

Lastly, I strongly suspect that one of the primary issues here is that LTG Caldwell’s influence effort was being led by a Marine colonel with zero experience in the field. When it comes to operating in today’s complex environment, you need a leader who truly understands the functional information capabilities, their limitations, and their strengths if he is to be successful in leading their integration. I do not think Col. Breazile was qualified to be in this position – as surely I know I am unqualified to fly an AH-1Z. And that is one of the most important take-aways for leadership: Influence is very, very hard. That random ten-year O-6 that we seem to have in abundance today is invariably not the guy you want running a critical LOO while learning influence OJT.

---

Meanwhile I'm learning to fly a helicopter gunship on my X-Box.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by anonamatic

That while sound advice isn't always true either. If it was well China would still be nearly completely agrarian.

---

Foreign companies who knew how to succeed invested in PRC directly and launched the export boom. At the very least their told their Chinese suppliers how exactly to produce what. The real Chinese business success came later on, and they still export a lot of flawed products when there's no thorough foreign QC.


It's really, really rare that those who fail in a benign environment succeed in a tougher one.
(The German football national team is such an exception; they can easily fail against a Faroer islands "national" team, but are still a top team at every world championship.)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Fuchs

Foreign companies who knew how to succeed invested in PRC directly and launched the export boom. At the very least their told their Chinese suppliers how exactly to produce what. The real Chinese business success came later on, and they still export a lot of flawed products when there's no thorough foreign QC.

---

Oh man that's very true. What's I find interesting is how frequently it has to do with miscommunication too. I think with business if you have deep enough pockets & a willingness to learn it's possible to succeed in new environments.

That example aside, I do think that while it might be important to do things locally to solve conditions that lead to the fulfillment of badly formed ideas by some Islamic immigrants (and I'll point at the US for being a poster child of dysfunction in that respect), the basic problem starts elsewhere. In this case it's Pakistan, and they have *issues*. The GOP based Fox News lie-o-sphere might be filled with deception aimed at their base, but there are fact based informational counters to their propaganda too. So in this instance I think it's not entirely useful to compare nations who find themselves with oppositional problems that occur via propaganda for direct comparison with each other.

Are there good examples of propaganda of comparable types being successfully countered in the Arab world in history by other nations? I'm wondering if there are, and what they did, and how they might be applied to this situation. Any number of European countries have issues with this stuff, so obviously does the US. I'm not sure what might be possible to do either as individual countries, or perhaps preferably as a group.