A while back, the US Army talked about restructuring its BCTs by adding in a third maneuver battalion. Anyone have any idea when/how that adjustment might be taking place?
My latest has the Army...
Type: Posts; User: TAH; Keyword(s):
A while back, the US Army talked about restructuring its BCTs by adding in a third maneuver battalion. Anyone have any idea when/how that adjustment might be taking place?
My latest has the Army...
Based on what I read today, the Army is being asked/tasked to cut 27,000 active-duty troops (plus 22,000 already programmed to go) by 2015.
Will be interesting to see where the cuts go.
If out...
A second order impact of the BSTB is as a Rear Area Operations C2 Hqs. With most of its units/assets task orged out it has little else to do. But this leaves it a a perfect position to take on this...
For the mounted scout/recon/cav, the larger the number of dismounts, the greater number of dismounted patrols & LP/OPs each unit can support.
A 36-man scout plt (could be CFV or Stryker) can...
It would not look anything like any of the existing BCT Recon/CAV Cdqrns.
Probably something like I have outlined over on the BCT thread:
2 hvy Cavalry Troops that have the capabiity of "fighting...
Could each of the Bns operate seperate from a Bde, sure. My thought is to standarize thsi new modular brigade type (DIV HQs) to simplify the CSS aspect. Which means I now need to add a DIV HQs CSS Bn...
My thought was that making the DIV HQs a "Bde Type" makes all of the units in the division a Bde.
The DIV HQs Bde could/would/might have as base:
1. A HQs Bn of the Division Staff
2. A Signal...
Could a C2 Bde and a Sus Bde be combined. Sure, but I would never recommend it. Missions, roles and functions are in no way close enough together.
No, I AM proposing a "new: DIV CAV to replace the...
This is different then the sustainment brigade?
According to Wikipedia:
A sustainment Bde will normally consist of a Hqs a supporting signal unit and a number of single function (trans, QM,...
1. Really, really hate the current BFSB. It's an MI Bn with stuff added and not very much of that. It does NOT possess the capabilities a Division or Corps of JTF commander will require from it.
...
under this concept/proposal the actual Division HQs is really only a Bn. Supported by the Signal Bn, protected by a security force and fed information by its own Recon Bn / CAV Sdrn.
Agree.
The Transformation/modularization of the US Army is a relatively recent effort that appears to be driven, at least to some extent, by the period of extended combat/conflict.
"Flattening"...
1. But we did restructure EAD, no more COSCOMs, no more CSGs/ASGs, no more ACRs, no more Corps Artillery/FA HQs or Corps Eng Bde or dedicated, organized Corps anything.
2. Agree with your comments...
I would contend that we never stopped being division centric.
We still retain Division HQs. We still deploy Division HQs for C2.
What changed was how divisions are structured/organized.
We...