Totally agree and I did not object to that use -- I did make a snide comment about possible misuse by a poor Commander. Poor Commanders can misuse anything, high tech or no tech.I also totally agree...
Type: Posts; User: Ken White; Keyword(s):
Totally agree and I did not object to that use -- I did make a snide comment about possible misuse by a poor Commander. Poor Commanders can misuse anything, high tech or no tech.I also totally agree...
No one is being tech averse so far I can see. Several of us caution that you cannot totally -- remember that word, totally -- rely on it and you should be prepared to implement alternatives, that...
but I can assure you it is or at least was emphatically not ignored in practice by a great many US commanders and leaders. :D
That's why the current push for mandatory interconnectivity, BFT, PLRS...
It is not. It is enabled by decent training. However, given even marginal training, a Commander with enough testicular fortitude to turn off the radios forces his subordinate commanders to perform...
wearing a war suit...:D
I really do post date the Smoke Signals and even the Telegraph and Heliograph. ;)
...Barely...
However, I'm old enough that radio was the primary comm means and we...
AFGE has more votes in Congress... :mad:
Had an employee illegally absent for over 76 days in one year. Took three letters, another 18 months (with more absences) and two hearings to get that...
As a former one of the former silly villian types, You are regrettably correct. However, there is a solution. One such who opposes that practice simply need find one kindred soul of like grade (and...
OTOH, maybe it's a valid organization and some service peculiar subordinate (nominal, of course...) commands are unnecessary...