One faulty assumption and a beautiful theory is ruined. What's Wilf's sign-off line again?
:rolleyes:
Type: Posts; User: Van; Keyword(s):
One faulty assumption and a beautiful theory is ruined. What's Wilf's sign-off line again?
:rolleyes:
I welcome correction or criticism, especially from Tom (the regional SME), but it seems to me that guns-for-bikes is better thought out than gun-for-cash.
Cash seems likely to get re-invested in...