Search:

This weekend, the NYT ran an analysis, NATO Sees Flaws in Air Campaign Against Qaddafi (by ERIC SCHMITT, April 14, 2012), in part addressing the scope of the US involvement in NATO's air campaign.
...

(including COL Jones and Dayuhan).

It is directed against those in my profession in the International Law field (both in the US and elsewhere) who (1) select "justice" where the US is involved -...

The correct phrase is: All successful insurgents are by definition "the new government".

In the eyes of that new government, our militiaman from Misrata is one of its many conquering heroes - none...

The Law as it reads -

No matter how you cut the doctrinal legal sausage, captured means detain under humane conditions for the duration of hostilities - subject to concurrent trial before a...

I don't have a dog in this race; but it may be interesting to see how the NTC handles its most recent change in course.

From The Guardian, Gaddafi killer faces prosecution, says Libyan interim...

of this:



and remove it from your Words and Phrases. The "if" voids any genuine apology (and I don't like apologies anyway). That being said, the rest I accept completely as a valid...

You elected not to answer them. That's your right.

My right is to ignore your comments.

Regards

Mike

Why not backoff ? Why not bypass it ? Why not capture it ?

Do you exclude those COAs ?

If you don't exclude alternative COAs, what are your criteria to select among them ?

Regards

Mike

both points are "obvious":



but, in truth, I don't think that's the case.

For example, 1977 Additional Protocol II (not acceded by USA; acceded by Libya, 7 Jun 1978):

at least to me, from the methodologies employed by the "Libyan Oppositon" (in quotes because it's not a monolith), is that the massive "lawyerly" volumes of International Humanitarian Law (e.g., as...