Results 1 to 20 of 141

Thread: Vietnam collection (lessons plus)

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Small Wars Journal SWJED's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Largo, Florida
    Posts
    3,989

    Default Top General Disputes Criticism Against Rumsfeld

    12 April Los Angeles Times - Top General Disputes Criticism Against Rumsfeld.

    Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld, facing calls for his resignation by three retired senior officers for his handling of the Iraq war, received a full-throated endorsement Tuesday from the U.S. military's top general, who insisted that "this country is exceptionally well served" by Rumsfeld's leadership.

    Marine Gen. Peter Pace, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, disputed accusations from retired top officers that Rumsfeld had forced the uniformed military into an invasion plan they didn't fully support.

    "We had then, and have now, every opportunity to speak our minds, and if we do not, shame on us because the opportunity is there," Pace said at a Pentagon news conference. "The plan that was executed was developed by military officers, presented by military officers, questioned by civilians as they should, revamped by military officers, and blessed by the senior military leadership."

    Pace's remarks, the most pointed on the Pentagon's leadership since he assumed the chairman's post in September, were prompted by a series of highly critical articles and interviews in recent weeks by former generals who were directly involved in the war or who served in top positions...

  2. #2
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Washington, Texas
    Posts
    305

    Default The Chiefs had signed off on Franks' war plan before it was presented

    CNN's report on Pace's statments includes the following:

    Rumsfeld said Newbold "never raised an issue publicly or privately when he was here that I know of." Pace also said he was unaware of any objections Newbold raised.

    Pace said plans for the invasion were significantly overhauled between the time Newbold retired and the day American troops crossed the Iraqi frontier in March 2003.

    He said members of the Joint Chiefs of Staff signed on to the war plan presented by Gen. Tommy Franks, then-commander of U.S. forces in the Middle East, before it was presented to Rumsfeld and President Bush, and top officers had "every opportunity to speak our minds."

    "And if we do not, shame on us, because the opportunity is there. It is elicited from us, and we're expected to," Pace said. (Emphasis added.)

  3. #3
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Washington, Texas
    Posts
    305

    Default Transcript of Gen. Pace's remarks on planning for Iraq war

    Here is the full transcript of remarks that the above news articles discuss.

    This is a brief excerpt:

    ...

    Let me just give you Pete Pace's rendition of how the process worked building up to Iraq. First of all, once it became apparent that we may have to take military action, the Secretary of Defense asked Tom Franks, who was the commander of Central Command, to begin doing some planning, which he did. Over the next two years, 50 or 60 times, Tom Franks either came to Washington or by video teleconference, sat down with the Secretary of Defense, sat down with the Joint Chiefs and went over what he was thinking, how he was planning. And as a result of those iterative opportunities and all the questions that were asked, not once was Tom told, "No, don't do that. No, don't do this. No, you can't have this. No, you can't have that." What happened was, in a very open roundtable discussion, questions about what might go right, what might go wrong, what would you need, how would you handle it, and that happened with the Joint Chiefs and it happened with the Secretary.



    And before the final orders were given, the Joint Chiefs met in private with General Franks and assured ourselves that the plan was a solid plan and that the resources that he needed were going to be allocated. We then went and told the Secretary of Defense our belief in Tom's plan and in the resources, and I know for a fact, because I was there, that when the Joint Chiefs were called over to the White House, several of the questions that the president asked specifically were about our understanding and belief in the plan, and whether or not the amount -- proper amount of resources had been allocated. He did that both with us, just the Joint Chiefs, and then again when all the combatant commanders were in from around the globe well before a final decision was made.

    ...
    This description is consistent with Gen. Franks description of the process. As I have pointed out before in the Prolog to his book Gen. Franks has the transcript of each component commander telling the President and Secretary of Defense that they had everything they needed for the mission.

    There are probably enough people invested in the myth of "Rumsfeld did not give them enough troops" that it will keep popping up. However, a more constructive debate would involve asking the commanders why they chose the makeup of the force that they did, instead of assuming something that clearly is not so.

  4. #4
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Stafford, VA
    Posts
    262

    Default

    While I have and will continue to trust and obey the orders of those appointed over me, and thus have no reason not to believe or doubt the integrity and moral courage of the senior leadership of our military, General Krulak once told me that "perception + truth = reality." Based off this formula, the truth may not be a clear cut as we would like. However, as all of us know that have participated in an planning session, "you dance with the girl you brought," or the girl your boss tells you to dance with; thus if all the commanders knew that asking for more troops was akin to asking where Jimmy Hoffa was buried, you develop courses of action consistent with assigned forces.

  5. #5
    Small Wars Journal SWJED's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Largo, Florida
    Posts
    3,989

    Default Rumsfeld Rebuked By Retired Generals

    13 April Washington Post - Rumsfeld Rebuked By Retired Generals by Tom Ricks.

    The retired commander of key forces in Iraq called yesterday for Donald H. Rumsfeld to step down, joining several other former top military commanders who have harshly criticized the defense secretary's authoritarian style for making the military's job more difficult.

    "I think we need a fresh start" at the top of the Pentagon, retired Army Maj. Gen. John Batiste, who commanded the 1st Infantry Division in Iraq in 2004-2005, said in an interview. "We need leadership up there that respects the military as they expect the military to respect them. And that leadership needs to understand teamwork."

    Batiste's comments resonate especially within the Army: It is widely known there that he was offered a promotion to three-star rank to return to Iraq and be the No. 2 U.S. military officer there but he declined because he no longer wished to serve under Rumsfeld...

    Batiste said he believes that the administration's handling of the Iraq war has violated fundamental military principles, such as unity of command and unity of effort. In other interviews, Batiste has said he thinks the violation of another military principle -- ensuring there are enough forces -- helped create the Abu Ghraib abuse scandal by putting too much responsibility on incompetent officers and undertrained troops...

  6. #6
    Small Wars Journal SWJED's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Largo, Florida
    Posts
    3,989

    Default White House Defends Rumsfeld's Tenure

    14 April Washington Post - White House Defends Rumsfeld's Tenure.

    The White House came to the aid of Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld yesterday, rebuffing calls from several retired generals for his resignation and crediting him with leading the Pentagon through two wars and a transformation of the military.

    "The president believes Secretary Rumsfeld is doing a very fine job during a challenging period in our nation's history," White House press secretary Scott McClellan said at a briefing. He went on to read long quotations from the nation's top military officer, Marine Gen. Peter Pace, praising Rumsfeld's dedication and patriotism.

    The defense of Rumsfeld is a perennial exercise for the White House whenever a fresh round of Rumsfeld-must-go demands arise on Capitol Hill or elsewhere in Washington. The difference this time is that those insisting that the secretary should step down are recently retired flag officers who appear to reflect widespread sentiment among people still in uniform...

  7. #7
    Small Wars Journal SWJED's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Largo, Florida
    Posts
    3,989

    Default Retired General's Call Puzzles Rumsfeld Aides

    14 April Washington Times - Retired General's Call Puzzles Rumsfeld Aides.

    Of the smattering of retired generals who have called on Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld to resign, none has surprised the Pentagon's inner circle more than retired Army Maj. Gen. John Batiste.

    Gen. Batiste commanded the 1st Infantry Division, responsible in Iraq for the hot spots of Tikrit and Samarra, north of Baghdad. On a chilly December night in 2004, he introduced Mr. Rumsfeld to his soldiers thus: "This is a man with the courage and the conviction to win the war on terrorism."

    A Rumsfeld aide said that when the two talked privately, the general voiced no complaints on how Washington, or Mr. Rumsfeld, was waging war...

    Five retired generals hardly constitute a groundswell among what the Pentagon estimates are 9,000 active and retired generals and admirals. But Pentagon officials fear there will be more such calls against Mr. Rumsfeld.

    The list now reads: Gen. Batiste; Gen. Riggs; retired Marine Corps Gen. Anthony Zinni, who opposed the Iraq invasion from the start; Marine Corps Lt. Gen. Gregory Newbold and Army Maj. Gen. Paul Eaton.

    "I was particularly taken aback by Batiste," said Larry Di Rita, a senior Rumsfeld adviser. "It seemed very contrary to the interaction I saw in Iraq."

  8. #8
    Small Wars Journal SWJED's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Largo, Florida
    Posts
    3,989

    Default Judge Rumsfeld by His Successes And Failures

    15 April Gateway Pundit blog - Judge Rumsfeld by His Successes And Failures.

    Before Abu Ghraib was known as a prison of barking dogs, nadedness and pyramiding but was a slaughterhouse where thousands of innocent Iraqis were executed under the Saddam Regime...
    Before there were democratic elections in Afghanistan and Iraq...
    Before documents were released showing links between Saddam and Al Qaeda...
    Before feminists were so Anti-Jew...
    Before the Butcher of Baghdad was given a smackdown as he was dragged from his spider hole...
    And, after all of this was accomplished with record low military casualties, civilian casualties and military fatalities...

    The mainstream media has been after Donald Rumsfeld...

  9. #9
    Small Wars Journal SWJED's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Largo, Florida
    Posts
    3,989

    Default Editorial, Commentary & Blog Roundup

    It's Solitaire for Rummy - New York Daily News Editorial

    The Generals War - Wall Street Journal Editorial

    Growing Calls for Rumsfeld's Dismissal - Financial Times Editorial

    The War Against Rumsfeld - Chicago Tribune Editorial

    Retired Summer Soldiers - Washington Times Commentary

    Generals Put Us On Slippery Slope - Seattle Post-Intelligencer Commentary

    Why Are They Speaking Up Now? - Washington Post Commentary

    Wrong Debate Over Rumsfeld - Washington Times Commentary

    Court of Inquiry - Real Clear Politics Commentary

    David vs. Goliath in Washington - New York Post Commentary

    A General Disgrace - Los Angeles Times Commentary

    A Case for Accountability - Washington Post Commentary

    Seven days in April - Washington Times Commentary

    Listen to the Brass - Washington Post Commentary

    Political Hothouse Perennial - Washington Times Commentary

    Roots of the Uprising - Washington Post Commentary

    Public Criticism of Rumsfeld Says it All - Boston Globe Commentary

    Why America's Generals Out For Revenge - London Times Commentary

    Rumsfeld's Job Security - New York Post Commentary

    Generally Speaking... With Hindsight - Washington Times Commentary

    The Good Fight, Done Badly - New York Times Commentary

    Behind the Military Revolt - Washington Post Commentary

    A General Misunderstanding - New York Times Commentary

    An Officer Responds To David Ignatius - Real Clear Politics Commentary

    Rumsfeld Staying Put - Real Clear Politics Commentary

    Dead-End Debates - National Review Commentary

    Why Didn't Generals Resign? - Chicago Sun-Times Commentary

    Reconcilable Differences - National Review Blog

    The Troubles of Donald Rumsfeld - Belmont Club Blog

    The Incoherence of the Former Generals - Prairie Pundit Blog

    Jack Kelly on the Rumsfeld Flap - Irish Pennants Blog

    Donald Rumsfeld and the Media, A Bitter Love - Gateway Pundit Blog

    Ignatius Makes A Case About Rumsfeld - Captain's Quarters Blog

    Judge Rumsfeld by His Successes And Failures - Gateway Pundit Blog

    Rumsfeld and the Generals - ZenPundit Blog

    Dear Generals: Please Stop, Immediately - The Adventures of Chester Blog

    The Rumsfeld Detractors - Washington Times Commentary

    Why Bush Should Keep Rumsfeld - Real Clear Politics Commentary

    The Generals are Revolting - Real Clear Politics Commentary

    Rumsfeld Must Resign - Baltimore Sun Commentary

    Railing at Rummy - New York Post Commentary

    Sour Grapes and Cheap Shots - Washington Times Commentary

    The Generals' Dangerous Whispers - Washington Post Commentary

    A 4-star Defense of the Republic - Los Angeles Times Commentary

    The Anger At Rumsfeld - Real Clear Politics Blog

    Former President Ford Defends Rumsfeld - Washington Post

    Generals’ Complaint Arrives Too Late - Boston Herald Editorial

    They Put Our Side in Danger - Miami Herald Commentary

    It's About Time We Focus on the Enemy - Chicago Tribune Commentary

    All-Star Shame - Washington Times Commentary

    Honor in Discretion - Wall Street Journal Commentary

    What Generals Have to Say Matters a Lot - Miami Herald Commentary

    Batiste: Why Rumsfeld Must Leave - Houston Chronicle Commentary

    Good Thing Civilians Direct Generals - Houston Chronicle Commentary

    Generals' Revolt Still a Hot Topic - Irish Pennants Blog

    Footprints in Iraq - Pittsburgh Post-Gazette Commentary

    Generals May Need to Stage Retreat - Philadelphia Inquirer Commentary

    Rumsfeld's Pentagon - Washington Times Commentary

    Rage at Don - Wall Street Journal Commentary

    Behind the Revolt - Washington Post Commentary

    A Dereliction of Duty - National Review Commentary
    Last edited by SWJED; 04-28-2006 at 11:46 AM.

Similar Threads

  1. Vietnam War Collection: books plus
    By Tom Odom in forum Historians
    Replies: 260
    Last Post: 02-10-2020, 04:16 PM
  2. Insurgency vs. Civil War
    By ryanmleigh in forum RFIs & Members' Projects
    Replies: 185
    Last Post: 02-16-2015, 02:54 PM
  3. Relationship between the political system and causes of war (questions)
    By AmericanPride in forum RFIs & Members' Projects
    Replies: 56
    Last Post: 03-30-2008, 09:16 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •