Results 1 to 20 of 178

Thread: Mech Platoon: CAB or ACR

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Council Member TAH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Kentucky
    Posts
    115

    Default 10th Mountain CG in Afganistan

    Quote Originally Posted by ODB View Post
    One cannot forget in today's technology driven warfare and over abundance of arm chair quarterbacks watching live feeds from the sky, of operations hundreds if not thousands of miles away
    Early in the fight in Afganistan I recall seeing a picture taken inside the the 10th Mountain Division HQs/TOC. It showed their CG (a two star) watching a live feed from a Predator UAV orbiting above a mission.

    My thought is/was, excuse me sir, that's jot your job.

    TAH

  2. #2
    Council Member Sparapet's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    District of Columbia
    Posts
    10

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TAH View Post
    Early in the fight in Afganistan I recall seeing a picture taken inside the the 10th Mountain Division HQs/TOC. It showed their CG (a two star) watching a live feed from a Predator UAV orbiting above a mission.

    My thought is/was, excuse me sir, that's jot your job.

    TAH
    I can understand that if he was bored and wanted to relive his ground-pounder days. But the C2 micromanagement is truly becoming a problem. This seems especially true in occupation actions where going above the Company level is relatively rare, majority of work being done at the platoon level. As a scout platoon (+) in OIF I did maybe 90% of my missions unsupported by the rest of the troop or squadron. Net result is endless reporting to higher via FBCB2 of every turn or 5 minute stop I execute in a 10 hour patrol. I eventually had a TC dedicated to being the live feed to SQDN......even though technically they could see me move anywhere in country. The incessant ISR presence was also a bit annoying. Half the time I knew I was being watched, as I could hear the drone, but it wasn't my asset to task to support my mission. 2 to 3 echelons above are watching so mission wise it was only useful to me if the gods that be ordained to share real-time info.
    Just some anecdotes. But more to the point, Auftragstaktik is not an approach readily valued in the maneuver force today. This may be due as much to the availability of information as patent paranoia for liability in certain operational environments.


    Cav Cpt

Similar Threads

  1. Platoon Weapons
    By Norfolk in forum Trigger Puller
    Replies: 218
    Last Post: 09-19-2014, 08:10 AM
  2. Redundancy in small unit organization
    By Presley Cannady in forum Trigger Puller
    Replies: 48
    Last Post: 07-31-2014, 09:00 PM
  3. Size of the Platoon and Company
    By tankersteve in forum Trigger Puller
    Replies: 129
    Last Post: 07-31-2014, 01:20 PM
  4. Abandon squad/section levels of organization?
    By Rifleman in forum Trigger Puller
    Replies: 120
    Last Post: 06-29-2014, 04:19 PM
  5. Infantry Unit Tactics, Tasks, Weapons, and Organization
    By Norfolk in forum Trigger Puller
    Replies: 306
    Last Post: 12-04-2012, 05:25 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •