Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Air2Water-A Possible Way to Reduce the Logistical Footprint

  1. #1
    Council Member
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Nebraska
    Posts
    137

    Default Air2Water-A Possible Way to Reduce the Logistical Footprint

    One of my readers sent me a note introducing Air2Water. He explained that it could be used to reduce the amount of vulnerable supply convoys in Afghanistan. In Afghanistan, convoys carrying fuel and water have been in most of the ambushes and IED attacks. Why? Because these resources truly keep our soldiers moving.

    Air2Water (link) works well in humid environments. It sucks in the moist air, and filters out clean water. They even have examined solutions for the military (link).

    Despite being extraordinarily unique and unheard of, I think the idea deserves to be considered. This idea sounds unpractical because of its uniqueness, but that doesn't mean we should discard it.

  2. #2
    Council Member 120mm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Wonderland
    Posts
    1,284

    Default

    Well, I heard "Afghanistan" and "Humid Environments" and all I heard after that was a buzzing noise.

    It's not that there isn't humid parts of the year, some places in Afghanistan, there just aren't enough of them to justify actually purchasing equipment to capture humidity. More than half the year, in 100% of the country, the equipment wouldn't even work because of the dryness of the climate.

  3. #3
    Council Member MikeF's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Chapel Hill, NC
    Posts
    1,177

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by huskerguy7 View Post
    One of my readers sent me a note introducing Air2Water. He explained that it could be used to reduce the amount of vulnerable supply convoys in Afghanistan. In Afghanistan, convoys carrying fuel and water have been in most of the ambushes and IED attacks. Why? Because these resources truly keep our soldiers moving.

    Air2Water (link) works well in humid environments. It sucks in the moist air, and filters out clean water. They even have examined solutions for the military (link).

    Despite being extraordinarily unique and unheard of, I think the idea deserves to be considered. This idea sounds unpractical because of its uniqueness, but that doesn't mean we should discard it.
    That's pretty cool. I wonder how loud it is?

Similar Threads

  1. Experts Advise Bush Not to Reduce Troops
    By SWJED in forum The Whole News
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 12-13-2006, 03:22 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •