The problem with the conduct of tactical operations, certainly in Helmand, is that a large number of them take place in what is effectively a medium density minefield. The issue then arises when under contact does one
- Close with and kill the enemy?
- Manoeuvre hard fast and aggressively into depth?
Or does one try to do either of the above while remaining in the cleared lane? Where does the balance of risk lie? My gut feel is that certainly Brit commanders in Helmand are very aware that if they manoeuvre outside of the cleared lane and take casualties then they will be held accountable in a Coroner's Court.
As for the hearing issue, certainly we recognise that for various reasons troops on the ground are having difficulty identifying firing points and more training emphasis is being directed that way. However I would point out that not only do we have radio input in one ear, but hearing defence (albeit technically sophisticated and personally moulded to fit!) is mandatory. Seems barking, but no hearing defence and we would lose most of our SNCOs and field grade officers as their hearing would be shot to pieces. Another example of the unforseen consequences of the enroachment of civil legislation into military operations.
Bookmarks