Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: The Future of War

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    389

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rex Brynen View Post
    The argument is actually made on the basis of 450 years of quantitative data--in other words, interbellum periods are part of the data set.
    I understand that. I am simply agreeing that it is during interbellum periods that there is almost always a continuous stream of argumentation that "major state" warfare is on the decline.

    I have a great many problems with Lebow's work (not just this one in particular.) I'll try to make time in the next couple of days to read the article in detail and hopefully articulate my thoughts (if I can get enough sleep .) Let's just say that I have a great many problems with his "quantitative data."

    Adam L
    Last edited by Adam L; 09-22-2010 at 02:09 AM.

  2. #2
    Council Member Fuchs's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    3,189

    Default

    I do often remind others that Germany lived in peace for 43 years until the #### did hit the fan and WW1 broke out.
    We had only (comparably few) colonial conflicts with indigenous people (few tribes) during that period.

    It did not help my grand-grandfather's generation in 1914.

  3. #3
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    The Land of The Morning Calm
    Posts
    177

    Default

    Arguements about shared economic interests (pre-WWI) or sociological/ideological hopefulness (Kellog-Briand crew) making the likelyhood of interstate warfare less likely tend to be disproven by history.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •