Results 1 to 20 of 94

Thread: Returning to a Division Centric Army

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    499

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Infanteer View Post
    What we probably need is smaller Bdes, Divs, and Corps served by smaller staffs.
    That's different than what I usually hear. Many on this board (and other boards I've lurked on) seem to advocate a return to big brigades of three or four battalions.

    The idea of a smaller division with a smaller staff is interesting. Am I correct that commanders of most Roman legions actually commanded about 10,000 men in the field because the famed legions of 5000 - 6000 men were supported by an almost equal number of auxiliaries? And, of course, the Mongol tumen was 10,000.

    I don't know if those examples are applicable to modern warfare but I find it interesting that their strength is what we would think of as a small division.
    Last edited by Rifleman; 10-05-2010 at 05:44 AM.
    "Pick up a rifle and you change instantly from a subject to a citizen." - Jeff Cooper

  2. #2
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Near the Spiral, New Zealand.
    Posts
    134

    Default

    I'd say, though, that their support overhead would be a lot smaller though...no troublesome '6' to bitch about comms problems, a '4' whose main problem was skill in foraging...

  3. #3
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    499

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SJPONeill View Post
    I'd say, though, that their support overhead would be a lot smaller though...no troublesome '6' to bitch about comms problems, a '4' whose main problem was skill in foraging...
    You so funny.
    "Pick up a rifle and you change instantly from a subject to a citizen." - Jeff Cooper

  4. #4
    Council Member Fuchs's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    3,189

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rifleman View Post
    That's different than what I usually hear. Many on this board (and other boards I've lurked on) seem to advocate a return to big brigades of three or four battalions.

    The idea of a smaller division with a smaller staff is interesting. Am I correct that commanders of most Roman legions actually commanded about 10,000 men in the field because the famed legions of 5000 - 6000 men were supported by an almost equal number of auxiliaries? And, of course, the Mongol tumen was 10,000.

    I don't know if those examples are applicable to modern warfare but I find it interesting that their strength is what we would think of as a small division.
    The span of command at that time depended on marching speed, courier rider speed and visual battlefield range. 25,000-30,000 was the practical corps/army size until the 19th century.
    This doesn't tell us much about today. It's merely interesting up to the early 20th century divisions, which were almost that large.

Similar Threads

  1. Towards a U.S. Army Officer Corps Strategy for Success
    By Shek in forum Training & Education
    Replies: 50
    Last Post: 05-16-2010, 06:27 AM
  2. Army Training Network
    By SWJED in forum TRADOC Senior Leaders Conference
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 08-20-2009, 03:45 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •