Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Comparing the Modular BCT to the British Future Army Structure

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    589

    Default

    The specific proposals, IIRC, were actually less about warfighting (ugly, neologism but we'll stick with it) and more about juggling personalle and force structure to an acceptable level (i.e., in terms of manning/funding/and that old bogey "the Treasury"). It was a way of justifying maintaing those capabilites rather than, say, have some suit/tie type turn up and say "you don't need tanks!" Jumbling the arms up like that was meant to "sell" combined arms (i.e., "we still need at least a bit of everything" to "donors".

  2. #2
    Council Member Fuchs's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    3,189

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tukhachevskii View Post
    The specific proposals, IIRC, were actually less about warfighting (ugly, neologism but we'll stick with it) and more about juggling personalle and force structure to an acceptable level (i.e., in terms of manning/funding/and that old bogey "the Treasury"). It was a way of justifying maintaing those capabilites rather than, say, have some suit/tie type turn up and say "you don't need tanks!" Jumbling the arms up like that was meant to "sell" combined arms (i.e., "we still need at least a bit of everything" to "donors".
    It was certainly not about optimizing the force for war under a given budget.

    The brain-melting effect of rotation schedules for small wars

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 08-05-2006, 08:57 AM
  2. Iraqis Adapt British Military Academy as Model
    By SWJED in forum The Whole News
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-27-2006, 09:16 AM
  3. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 02-05-2006, 02:06 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •