Results 1 to 20 of 34

Thread: Strategic Compression

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #17
    Small Wars Journal SWJED's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Largo, Florida
    Posts
    3,989

    Default Yes...

    Quote Originally Posted by zenpundit View Post
    What about a systemic consideration of factors that exert a countervailing effect ("strategic de-compression") to disaggergate war into levels ? They could be man-made or something natural like distance/time

    I would hazard that these variables always exist to some extent in tension with the forces of compression. Perhaps a comparative taxonomy ?
    One school of thought is that there are no "man-made" factors that could contribute to de-compression. (Short of say an EMP attack or some other counterproductive and catastrophic device).

    Seems that distance-time has been regulated to the back-waters when it comes to command, control and intelligence.

    This brings us to yet another focus area - command and control can be instantaneous - yet bringing to bear "physical aspects" of warfare have not yet caught up - troops and logistics stand out here. Does this force us to rely on those physical aspects that are "timely" - airpower for example?

    The school of thought that there is little or nothing we can do to control strategic compression seems to be pointing towards command awareness that it does indeed exist and providing the tools, training and education to enable timely mitigation when negative incidents of strategic compression occur.

    This last item raises another question for the Council – are there positive aspects of strategic compression that we can use to our advantage?
    Last edited by SWJED; 09-20-2006 at 08:08 PM.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •