Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Liu Xiaobo - Nobel Peace Prize

  1. #1
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Durban, South Africa
    Posts
    3,902

    Default Liu Xiaobo - Nobel Peace Prize

    Listening to the award ceremony of the Nobel Peace Prize of Liu Xiaobo today it was claimed that:

    "never before have two democracies gone to war against each other."

    Anyone have any comment or anything to substantiate this?

  2. #2
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Durban, South Africa
    Posts
    3,902

    Default China cracked the whip...

    ... and the following countries declined to attend the award ceremony:

    Russia,
    Kazakhstan,
    Colombia,
    Tunisia,
    Saudi Arabia,
    Pakistan,
    Serbia (which changed its mind and attended),
    Iraq,
    Iran,
    Vietnam,
    Afghanistan,
    Venezuela,
    the Philippines,
    Egypt,
    Sudan,
    Ukraine,
    Cuba
    Morocco.

    See any great democracies on the list?
    Last edited by davidbfpo; 12-13-2010 at 08:00 AM. Reason: Qualifier re Serbia added at authors request

  3. #3
    Council Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    4,021

    Default It depends on how ....

    you define a "democracy"

    A huge amount of ink and bytes have been spilled on that topic ("no wars betwixt democracies") and the related topic of "democracies success vice internal insurgencies". The search engines are your friends.

    Regards

    Mike

  4. #4
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Durban, South Africa
    Posts
    3,902

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jmm99 View Post
    you define a "democracy"

    A huge amount of ink and bytes have been spilled on that topic ("no wars betwixt democracies") and the related topic of "democracies success vice internal insurgencies". The search engines are your friends.

    Regards

    Mike
    I suggest what we saw here was China doing a little arm twisting or getting kindred spirits (with no human rights or democratic conscience) to agree with them. Not a great success I note.

    With WikiLeaks we see the US version with the added "influence" over certain large financial (credit card) service providers. Note with great success either I note.

  5. #5
    Council Member davidbfpo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    13,366

    Default Democracies can fight each other

    JMA,

    You cited
    never before have two democracies gone to war against each other.
    How about World War One? Germany was a parliamentary democracy, Austria-Hungary maybe less so, Russia was not, France, Great Britain and Belgium were.

    A few decades before the Franco-Prussian War?

    Exhausted my instant history memory on a Sunday evening.
    davidbfpo

  6. #6
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Durban, South Africa
    Posts
    3,902

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by davidbfpo View Post
    JMA,

    You cited

    How about World War One? Germany was a parliamentary democracy, Austria-Hungary maybe less so, Russia was not, France, Great Britain and Belgium were.

    A few decades before the Franco-Prussian War?

    Exhausted my instant history memory on a Sunday evening.
    David, I just don't know. Heard the award speech and that sounding odd (and interesting) so thought I would see if anyone here thought the same.

  7. #7
    Council Member bourbon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Posts
    903

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JMA View Post
    "never before have two democracies gone to war against each other."

    Anyone have any comment or anything to substantiate this?
    It is the so-called “Democratic Peace Theory”, a tenet of liberal-interventionism and neo-conservatism alike.

    Thomas Friedman offered his own version of democratic peace theory in his book The Lexus and the Olive Tree, with his “Golden Arches Theory of Conflict Prevention” whereby he argued that no two nations with a McDonald's franchise have ever gone to war with each other.

    Tom Friedman, however, is a buffoon; right after Lexus was published NATO started bombing Serbia, which had McDonald’s. Other exceptions to the Golden Arches theory have been: Russia-Georgia, India-Pakistan, Israel-Lebanon.

  8. #8
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Durban, South Africa
    Posts
    3,902

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bourbon View Post
    It is the so-called “Democratic Peace Theory”, a tenet of liberal-interventionism and neo-conservatism alike.

    Thomas Friedman offered his own version of democratic peace theory in his book The Lexus and the Olive Tree, with his “Golden Arches Theory of Conflict Prevention” whereby he argued that no two nations with a McDonald's franchise have ever gone to war with each other.

    Tom Friedman, however, is a buffoon; right after Lexus was published NATO started bombing Serbia, which had McDonald’s. Other exceptions to the Golden Arches theory have been: Russia-Georgia, India-Pakistan, Israel-Lebanon.
    Thank you, I was wondering where they got it from.

  9. #9
    Council Member Infanteer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    347

    Default

    I went through this debate in an IR class - the closest we got was Turkey vs Greece.

    Liberal democracies haven't fought each other because:

    1. They're still quite new; and

    2. They've been too busy fighting everybody else.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •