Mechanized Infantry Perceptions 2010

[jcustis]

On another forum I frequent, quite a few tankers ran the vid back and forth in slow motion. They agreed that the guy seen holding his charred arms in the air to his sides was previously inside the turret area (yup, with the hatches closed). When the round hit, the detonation blew hatches open and the tanker out of the vehicle.

The plume of fire rushing out is the propellant of the main gun's rounds burning. That's one of the design limitations of the T-72. It's going to go up like a Roman candle if that stuff is ignited, and it is susceptible to lighting because the semi-combustible cases are exposed at the bottom of the turret basket.

That guy must have died an especially gruesome and painful death.

[gute]

On another forum I frequent, quite a few tankers ran the vid back and forth in slow motion. They agreed that the guy seen holding his charred arms in the air to his sides was previously inside the turret area (yup, with the hatches closed). When the round hit, the detonation blew hatches open and the tanker out of the vehicle.

The plume of fire rushing out is the propellant of the main gun's rounds burning. That's one of the design limitations of the T-72. It's going to go up like a Roman candle if that stuff is ignited, and it is susceptible to lighting because the semi-combustible cases are exposed at the bottom of the turret basket.

That guy must have died an especially gruesome and painful death.

It blew him out of the turret? Holy Crap!

Do you mind mentioning the other forum? If so a PM is cool or if not I understand.

[jcustis]

It was on Lightfighter.net. It will require joining and posting a brief introduction is preferred before posting if you ever get around to it.

Give me a day and I'll get you the link to the discussion.

[jcustis]

Found it: http://http://www.lightfighter.net/t...43236916266323

Most members posting to the discussion are real deal, experienced tread heads.

[gute]

Found it: http://http://www.lightfighter.net/t...43236916266323

Most members posting to the discussion are real deal, experienced tread heads.

Already a member. Thanks for the information.

[ganulv]

That guy must have died an especially gruesome and painful death.

It amazes me he was able to was able to pick himself up off the ground, much less run for cover, given how concussed he must have been.

[Compost]

http://www.army.mil/article/131126/R...mbat_vehicles/

Operational and tactical mobility could be improved by reducing the design weight of armoured reconnaissance vehicles and early-entry AFVs. Reduction of design weight might also serve to reduce size as a target and also observability. But reducing or limiting the weight of main force AFVs reduces potential armour protection and the weight and bulk of sensors and munitions provided for combat performance and endurance.

Looking on the bright side, researching a blanket 40% reduction in the weight of AFVs might be a usefully memorable exercise in futility.

[Granite_State]

Since this thread has been resurrected, some good stuff in the online Journal of Military Operations lately. The last issue had an article by Jim Storr looking at armored reconnaissance (specifically the value of stealth) and Council member William F. Owen discussed the IFV as a doctrinal wrong turn in Issue 3. Both articles well worth a read, as is almost all of what they publish.

(Added by Moderator)

Link to cited journal, free after registration:https://www.tjomo.com/