Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Report says too many whites, men leading (US) military

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Council Member J Wolfsberger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    806

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ken White View Post
    I believe Congress would support that approach IF the services would be logical and consistent instead of trying to often trying to bamboozle the Congroids to do it the service way...
    From what I've heard, that's worked for the Marines. I hope I've heard correctly.

    ganulv, the problem is that programs to accomplish diversity for the sake of diversity always crowd out merit and effectiveness. Always. If the diversity police decide the organization doesn't have enough members of subject group A in a particular category, then they will insist that members of group A be hired or promoted in regardless of ability. They will cheerfully explain that insistence on ability to perform the work is just bigotry.

    That isn't to say that underrepresentation of a particular group might not indicate a problem. It may very well indicate that there is some bigotry involved in recruitment, selection or advancement. But even in that case, the problem is the bigotry that denies opportunity and advancement, not a lack of "diversity."

    It also helps to recognize that in some cases, self selection does take place. There are few, if any, Seventh Day Adventists in the combat arms - because it violates there religious principles. They have and do, however, serve in other areas, and have a particularly distinguished record as medics and corpsmen. It is extremely unlikely we'll ever see, for example, a CJS who practices that religious tradition, not because of any bigotry, but because they have selected themselves out of any career track that might lead to it.
    John Wolfsberger, Jr.

    An unruffled person with some useful skills.

  2. #2
    Council Member ganulv's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Berkshire County, Mass.
    Posts
    896

    Default

    Sorry all, I should have been clearer in my wording. I’m not advocating seperate but equal, just acknowledging that affirmative action-style programs have a tendency to place individuals in a sink-or-swim situation and mandate they not sink. Another option would be to place individuals in a sink-or-swim situation and make sure they know how to swim. The former option may be well-intentioned, but regardless of intentions the latter requires a lot more commitment and hard work on everyone’s part.

Similar Threads

  1. More killing. Less good deeds
    By William F. Owen in forum Futurists & Theorists
    Replies: 157
    Last Post: 10-15-2009, 04:32 AM
  2. Impacts on Finland/EU/NATO of renewed IW/COIN focus of US military
    By charlyjsp in forum RFIs & Members' Projects
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 07-03-2009, 05:43 PM
  3. DoD IG Gimble Report on Iraq Intel
    By Tom Odom in forum The Whole News
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 06-05-2008, 05:28 PM
  4. MCOs and SSOs in the 2008 edition of FM 3-0 Operations
    By Norfolk in forum Doctrine & TTPs
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 03-17-2008, 12:15 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •