My understanding is that State's Intel Unit used to be the Open Source Unit for the OSS. Once the OSS was disbanded they were placed with the State Department.
My understanding is that State's Intel Unit used to be the Open Source Unit for the OSS. Once the OSS was disbanded they were placed with the State Department.
I can't speak to the OSS connection but my experience with State INR as a historian wading through the 1964 Congo Crisis, as an intelligence analyst in Gulf War 1, and as an intel operator in Zaire and Rwanda was that INR did first rate work.
In many ways that work was possible because INR operated semi-independently of the regional bureaus and was not subject to policy pressures as are the bureaus and the embassies.
Finally my associates at INR stayed in their roles longer and developed greater depth than the analysts at DIA or CIA.
Tom
It was not by accident that the new head of analysis under the DNI was the former head of State INR. Despite having fewer analysts then the CIA has lunchroom workers, INR has always prided themselves on long term deep analysis by analysts who cover an area for decades. Instead of playing 5-year old soccer "all the crowd the ball" intel or try to be a classified CNN, INR focuses on quality of analysis. A trait the 9/11 report said was "lacking" at CIA and DIA.
How has INR fared in the big intelligence shuffle of the past five years?
These guys sound like people I'd like to work for...
For what it is worth I think INR is the cream of the crop for intel analysis. They do not rely on billion dollar collection systems or having thousands of analysts, instead they focus on history, culture, language and in-country experience. Their products are focused toward the diplomatic leadership, but they are first rate for deep analysis. The only problem is that many foreign service officers, who run DoS, think they are better than intel analysts and INR gets second billing in the very political senior levels of the DoS.
Those are just my two cents from working with then. The big agencies have alot to learn form INR. I welcome any other thoughts.
Art,
Though I am now over 7 years removed from the IC, my impressions in the 80's and 90's echo your observations. Whenever an INR analyst spoke at a NIE or any other gathering of community analysts I listened because there was meat behind what they had to say - and like you said - based on history, culture, language and in-country experience.
Dave
Bookmarks