Results 1 to 20 of 22

Thread: Ho Hum;Another Stupid War Of Choice

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    53

    Default

    I "know" that for any incident of the type that you mention, you can find a pianoroll like this:

    http://100777.com/node/101

    I am also aware that neither the official allegations nor the conspiratorial rebuttal are entitled to any weight at all without reading all the files possessed by all of the governments involved. Probably won't happen soon.

    The US lies a lot. A foreign policy based on revenge is stupid. Pretty sure about those points.

  2. #2
    Registered User 5th_Req's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Camp Lejeune
    Posts
    5

    Default

    A foreign policy based on revenge is stupid? Then we should never go to war for injuries against our State? We should never go to war for injuries against allies of our State?

  3. #3
    Council Member Fuchs's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    3,189

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 5th_Req View Post
    A foreign policy based on revenge is stupid? Then we should never go to war for injuries against our State? We should never go to war for injuries against allies of our State?
    Actually, no. That are sunk costs and thus to be ignored.

    It may be necessary to deter such behaviour for the future by responding to provocations, though. That would not be the same as revenge, and it should show.

  4. #4
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    53

    Default

    A corollary of Fuchs' point is that the past grievances, assuming they actually did occur in conformity with the various press releases, were a result of haphazard reactions, rather than a consistent known policy.

  5. #5
    Council Member Dayuhan's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Latitude 17° 5' 11N, Longitude 120° 54' 24E, altitude 1499m. Right where I want to be.
    Posts
    3,137

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 91bravojoe View Post
    A corollary of Fuchs' point is that the past grievances, assuming they actually did occur in conformity with the various press releases, were a result of haphazard reactions, rather than a consistent known policy.
    Why would you assume "haphazard reaction"? Certainly in the case of Al Qaeda the actions inspiring our grievances were totally consistent with that organization's consistent known policies.

Similar Threads

  1. Crimes, War Crimes and the War on Terror
    By davidbfpo in forum Law Enforcement
    Replies: 600
    Last Post: 03-03-2014, 04:30 PM
  2. SSI Annual Strategy Conference: The Meaning of War
    By SteveMetz in forum Miscellaneous Goings On
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 03-12-2010, 01:24 PM
  3. Afghanistan troop surge could backfire, experts warn
    By jkm_101_fso in forum OEF - Afghanistan
    Replies: 69
    Last Post: 09-06-2008, 10:43 PM
  4. Pedagogy for the Long War: Teaching Irregular Warfare
    By CSC2005 in forum Training & Education
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 01-02-2008, 11:04 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •