Originally Posted by
davidbfpo
I noted a reference to a 85% recidivist rate, mapping their location when on probation etc and overlaying that on current crime patterns to direct pro-active action. That puzzled me, if your detection rate is low it is a dangerous assumption to assume recidivists are those responsible and act upon.
There is considerable research on house burglary, here and in the USA IIRC, that many offenders remain unknown to law enforcement and when presented with an opportunity a known cheque fraudster for example will commit a burglary.
Bookmarks