Page 3 of 8 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 41 to 60 of 150

Thread: Bin Laden: after Abbottabad (merged thread)

  1. #41
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    1,457

    Default

    Located the compound in Google Earth:

    34°10'9.90"N
    73°14'33.94"E

    Link to location on Google maps.

    This compound is missing from imagery taken in 2001, but is present by 2005 (the most recent GE imagery available).
    Supporting "time-limited, scope limited military actions" for 20 years.

  2. #42
    Council Member davidbfpo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    13,366

    Default The 'Compound' factor Part 3

    Quote Originally Posted by Entropy View Post
    That's interesting stuff David, thanks. Hard to believe OBL could exist there for so long without inside assistance of some kind from the Pakistan military or ISI.
    Entropy,

    If no-one knows he is there, what help is needed from 'inside assistance' ?

    Without checking with my advisers I would also expect many people who can afford such a compound and have lived in NWFP / FATA have moved out or have a second home. So the appearance of the compound would not have attracted comment.

    Discreet occupiers? In Pakistan many follow the rule that discretion decreases vulnerability to preying eyes and actions - common criminals and some of the state's agents working privately. Plus many from those areas are traditionally more socially conservative than other parts of Pakistan.

    You also have to consider that a low profile compound could be a Pakistani state agency facility, owned by an ex-state agent and a non-Pakistani occupier. Just a few words and some theatre would keep neighbours away.

    Addition: some of my comments are also on this BBC report:http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-south-asia-13257338
    Last edited by davidbfpo; 05-02-2011 at 07:46 PM. Reason: added link
    davidbfpo

  3. #43
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    1,457

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rex Brynen View Post
    While I think it is certainly possible that Pakistani Army and/or ISI elements knew where he was, I think it is equally likely that they didn't. UBL seems to have gone to great lengths to limit the possibility of leaks (no landline or internet, controlled access, purpose-built villa with few windows, high walls, use of only a few trusted couriers, etc.) Why compromise all that with the risk that someone in the Army or ISI might get tempted by that $25m reward and provide a tip-off?

    I'm not sure that 800m from a military academy is necessarily a more difficult place to hide out than any other urban area.
    Rex,

    Points well taken. However, if the BBC is correcting in their report that this location is within the military cantonment zone then that could indicate some inside help. Also, to be clear, there is a big difference between an institutional decision by the Army/ISI to harbor UBL (something I don't think was the case at all) and sympathetic insiders who acted on their own and used their position within those organizations to make this possible. It seems to me that is definitely a possibility.
    Supporting "time-limited, scope limited military actions" for 20 years.

  4. #44
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    1,457

    Default

    If no-one knows he is there, what help is needed from 'inside assistance' ?

    Without checking with my advisers I would also expect many people who can afford such a compound and have lived in NWFP / FATA have moved out or have a second home. So the appearance of the compound would not have attracted comment.
    David,

    If this compound was built for the purpose of housing UBL and it was built in a military area then it seems reasonable to conclude that someone with military/security ties built it. Also, if it's true this was in the military cantonment zone, then UBL's couriers would have spent the past 5+ years going through Pakistani military checkpoints. That doesn't prove there was collusion, of course, but it does raise some questions.
    Supporting "time-limited, scope limited military actions" for 20 years.

  5. #45
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    1,457
    Last edited by davidbfpo; 05-02-2011 at 07:32 PM. Reason: 2nd link added by Moderator
    Supporting "time-limited, scope limited military actions" for 20 years.

  6. #46
    Council Member davidbfpo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    13,366

    Default There's another thread

    AdamG posted earlier and I moved it into this thread. He has asked it be kept separate: 'OBL's death & Terrorism's next move':http://council.smallwarsjournal.com/...ad.php?t=13217
    davidbfpo

  7. #47
    Council Member davidbfpo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    13,366

    Default The 'Compound' factor Part 4

    Quote Originally Posted by Entropy View Post
    David,

    If this compound was built for the purpose of housing UBL and it was built in a military area then it seems reasonable to conclude that someone with military/security ties built it. Also, if it's true this was in the military cantonment zone, then UBL's couriers would have spent the past 5+ years going through Pakistani military checkpoints. That doesn't prove there was collusion, of course, but it does raise some questions.
    I'm trying to think of an American illustration. The compound is adjacent to and near a military installation, say Davis-Mothan AFB across the road and in a housing area that is primarily for USAF staff. A housing area called a cantonment does not mean it is military owned or controlled and maybe within a security zone, when the level of security is raised is patrolled or VCP'd. I am sure you know of residential areas almost surrounded by US military bases.

    As for the passage of couriers I expect them to be unarmed, possibly on foot or a motorcycle and able to pass unhindered. Arrive in a car less predictable and vulnerable to a cursory check / rummage.

    To me very few questions.
    davidbfpo

  8. #48
    Council Member
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Calcutta, India
    Posts
    1,124

    Default

    The killing of Osama bin Laden (OBL) was a good job done.

    That the Pakistan ISI protects the terrorists of all status is now well established since OBL was in a military cantonment.

    Cantonments, as per the British rules and being followed in the subcontinent, are run by the Military Estates Officer (a civil servant) and the Senior Most Army Officer is the Chairman of the Cantonment Board. He is responsible for all matters, policing, garbage disposal, environment, parks, housing laws and so on.

    Given the popular support Imran Khan had whipped up whereby for two days the NATO supply line was blocked and the US and Pakistan Govt given a notice of 30 days to stop all Drone attacks, the killing of OBL was ideal to divert attention from the main issue of Drone attacks and wanting the US out of Pakistan, Drones and all. I believe the US is in the process of winding up Drone operations from their base(s) in Pakistan.

    It would be prudent to watch how the Pakistani masses take OBL's killing.

    On it will depend how the cat shall jump.

    Will there be revenge attacks within Pakistan, in the neighbourhood or even in the West is to be seen.

    If the attacks are on the West, Pakistan will be up a gum tree.
    Last edited by Ray; 05-02-2011 at 05:06 PM.

  9. #49
    Council Member
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Calcutta, India
    Posts
    1,124

    Default

    Hundreds join first Pakistan rally to honour Osama bin Laden
    AFP | May 2, 2011, 09.39pm IST

    QUETTA, PAKISTAN: Hundreds took to the streets of Pakistan's city of Quetta on Monday to pay homage to Osama bin Laden, chanting death to America and setting fire to a US flag, witnesses and organisers said.

    Angry participants belonging to a religious party in Quetta, the capital of southwestern province Baluchistan, were led by federal lawmaker Maulawi Asmatullah. They also torched a US flag before dispersing peacefully.
    "Bin Laden was the hero of the Muslim world and after his martyrdom he has won the title of great mujahed (Muslim fighter)," Asmatullah said.
    Link

  10. #50

  11. #51
    Council Member Fuchs's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    3,189

    Default

    East Germany harbored West German left-wing terrorists (R.A.F.) - under the condition that
    a) they don't ever leave East germany
    b) they don't do anything related to R.A.F. again


    Maybe Pakistan did the same and that's the reason for the near-complete separation of UBL from day-to-day AQ business?

  12. #52
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Toronto, Canada
    Posts
    5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Fuchs View Post
    This is a great opportunity to declare victory and get out of the mess.
    A pessimistic outlook from National Defense magazine:
    http://www.nationaldefensemagazine.o...st.aspx?ID=404

    Doesn't seem like the talking heads are headed in that direction right now.

  13. #53
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    People's Republic of California
    Posts
    85

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by davidbfpo View Post
    I'm trying to think of an American illustration.
    How about Quantico, VA?
    Quantico is a famous town in the state of Virginia in United States, which comes under the control of the Prince William County. The Quantico city is considered as the county seat of Prince William County and the city is located in the Metropolitan Area of Washington. The Marine Corps Base Quantico covers three sides of the Quantico city and the fourth side of the city is covered by the Potomac River.
    Could someone get into the city of Quantico without tipping off the USMC? I would imagine so.
    No amount of proof (photo, DNA, corpse etc) will convince the non-believers. So I think killing him on the spot and burial at sea were the best decisions they could've made under the circumstances. The following video will demonstrate my point... Exhibit A

    Above all I'm really happy no US personnel got hurt. I look forward to hearing about follow-on operations that will be based on intel gathered from the hideout.

  14. #54
    Registered User ergomatic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    2

    Default actually...seems likely to me

    my intuition, unencumbered by evidence or expertise, is that this went down pretty much exactly as described by the President and other administration officials. Given the level of OPSEC discipline shown by OBL in the past, I find it completely plausible that he could have installed himself in the compound with no help whatsoever from ISI or any other Pakistani government entity. Dude must have had one hell of a videogame collection, though....how do you keep from going completely stir-crazy, keeping yourself sequestered like that? The weak point is getting inside- any intel on when OBL took up residency?

  15. #55
    Council Member Fuchs's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    3,189

    Default

    Compound was built in 2005 afaik.

    Btw, I read the firefight lasted for 40 minutes. Surprising.

  16. #56
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    273

    Default

    Given the compound's location, it seems like the most likely scenario is that OBL occupied it with the knowledge and possibly the assistance of the ISI. It's certainly possible that the ISI wasn't aware, but that strikes me as the more extraordinary claim.

    The question of whether we found OBL with their help or despite it (assuming they knew) is a coin toss. OBL was a high value target to us, but his greatest value to AQ and its extended friends seems like maybe it lay mostly in the fact that we wanted him, with some possible secondary value as a figurehead or totem. If the ISI did know his location, that information would have been to them a really valuable bargaining chip (and if the ISI helped set him up in that compound, it was probably to lock him down for future use as such).

  17. #57
    Council Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    4,021

    Thumbs up One gone;

    one more to go.

    Boots on the ground; confirmation of the 2001 AUMF and the Laws of War.

    Regards

    Mike

  18. #58
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    123

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by davidbfpo View Post
    I'm trying to think of an American illustration. The compound is adjacent to and near a military installation, say Davis-Mothan AFB across the road and in a housing area that is primarily for USAF staff. A housing area called a cantonment does not mean it is military owned or controlled and maybe within a security zone, when the level of security is raised is patrolled or VCP'd. I am sure you know of residential areas almost surrounded by US military bases.

    As for the passage of couriers I expect them to be unarmed, possibly on foot or a motorcycle and able to pass unhindered. Arrive in a car less predictable and vulnerable to a cursory check / rummage.

    To me very few questions.
    AFAIK, both Pakistan and India follow British cantonment rules which denies the building of any structure above two stories within 2 km radius. Even if they exists, they are most probably raised before the establishment of the military institution or in the case that the cantonment is established within city limits. Both the cases are invalid here.

    Secondly, for the past few years Pakistani military establishments are being targeted by Taliban and other terrorist outfits. So, the question is that how come this mansion avoided scrutiny by Pakistani military or intelligence community.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2008_Lahore_bombings

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2009_La...cademy_attacks
    Last edited by blueblood; 05-03-2011 at 01:39 AM.

  19. #59
    Council Member
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Nebraska
    Posts
    137

    Default ?

    I'm just baffled by Pakistan's inability to "know" of OBL's presence. I've expressed my thoughts, but one thing just bugs me: the size of the mansion. The mansion is between a hospital and college, so there is no doubt a large amount of human traffic around the compound. According to various sources, it's 8 times the size of other buildings in the same area; it sticks out. How do members of the local population not notice the compound? I mean, if a house 8 times the size of my home was built a block away, I would definitely put forth the energy to find out who lives there any maybe what they do because it's just not normal.

    Here's the thing. We can't begin chewing out Pakistan and telling them that we aren't going to work with them. That's equivalent to a road builder saying that he won't work with the Department of Roads. It just won't work.

  20. #60
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    273

    Default

    Well, regarding the locals, I doubt they wanted to know. Possible results of knowing OBL is your next-door neighbor:

    1) OBL's buddies kill you to keep you quiet.
    2) The US blows up the whole compound and you're collateral damage.
    3) The US sends in a team to kill OBL in person, and you have to worry about catching a stray round.

    There's really no upside to knowing.

Similar Threads

  1. Bin Laden: before Abbottabad (merged thread)
    By SWJED in forum Global Issues & Threats
    Replies: 71
    Last Post: 12-16-2013, 04:31 PM
  2. Replies: 69
    Last Post: 05-23-2012, 11:51 AM
  3. Before Abbottabad: hunting AQ leaders (merged thread)
    By jcustis in forum Adversary / Threat
    Replies: 69
    Last Post: 03-16-2012, 04:53 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •