Results 1 to 20 of 78

Thread: Crowdsourcing on AQ and Analysis (new title)

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Council Member davidbfpo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    13,366

    Default Thoughts on disruption and more

    I struggled with a title; the author IMO is a 'disruptive thinker', a theme that appears on SWJ in particular and using his own, long title would be wrong.

    CWOT's interesting short article on this difficult topic, which often appears here and more widely in intelligence studies. It starts with a German (Prussian IIRC) quote pre-WW1:
    In war you will generally find that the enemy has at any time three courses of action open to him. Of those three, he will invariably choose the fourth.

    —Helmuth Von Moltke

    With that quip, Von Moltke may have launched a spirited debate within his intelligence staff. The modern version of the debate can be said to exist in
    the cottage industry that has been built on the examination and explanation of intelligence failures, surprises, omissions, and shortcomings.

    The contributions of notable scholars to the discussion span multiple analytic generations, and each expresses points with equal measures of regret, fervor, and hope. Their diagnoses and their prescriptions are sadly similar, however, suggesting that the lessons of the past are lost on each succeeding generation of analysts and managers or that the processes and culture of intelligence analysis are incapable of evolution. It is with the same regret, fervor, and hope that we offer our own observations on avoiding intelligence omissions and surprise. Our intent is to explore the ingrained bias against outliers, the potential utility of outliers, and strategies for deliberately
    considering them.
    Link:https://www.cia.gov/library/center-f...iers-13Jan.pdf

    CWOT cites several crowd sourcing surveys, which have appeared here and draws on those.
    davidbfpo

  2. #2
    Council Member davidbfpo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    13,366

    Default Moderator at work

    I have merged into this thread eight of CWOT's crowd sourcing threads. They were: Does Bin Laden Matter?, Crowdsourcing AQ's Strategy 2011-2012, Vote Now - 1 Year After Bin Laden: What has happened?, Results of the Post Bin Laden & AQ Strategy Poll, Results "How big is al Qaeda?", Vote: What will terrorism be post Bin Laden? and Financial Implications of Bin Laden's death.

    I have also renamed the thread's title, it was How Bin Laden Narratives Hindered Analysis.
    Last edited by davidbfpo; 06-28-2012 at 12:11 PM.
    davidbfpo

  3. #3
    Council Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Cambridge, MA
    Posts
    75

    Default Latest Crowdsourcing question

    David,

    thanks for consolidating.

    And for those interested in my latest crowdsourcing experiment, here's a 1-question survey I'm running.

    Should the U.S. and Europe openly support the resistance in Syria?

    Vote at this link if interested:

    https://www.surveymonkey.com/s/ZRS5JDG

    I'll post the results here at the end of the week.

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •