Results 1 to 20 of 78

Thread: Crowdsourcing on AQ and Analysis (new title)

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #15
    Council Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    4,021

    Default My two cents

    based on what works and has worked for me and others I've observed over the years (lawyers, cops and investigators) - follow the evidence, recognize systems and use fuzzy (not cast in concrete) patterns.

    A quick graphic down and dirty. The Deep and Narrow, and the Broad and Shallow, are recipes for disasters. So, use the more difficult "Evidence Tree" which is a compromise (time is not infinite - "better" leads have to be chosen):

    Evidence Trees.jpg

    Have to do some of my Real World stuff.

    Regards

    Mike

    PS: A couple of years ago, Slap and I had a conversation re: systems. I said I was dumb on systems - I was thinking about all the academic stuff (Bravo Sierra in Stanian terms) on systems. Slap said: No, you use systems every day. So, I looked about and concluded he was right. I use them, have used them before I was a lawyer; but just haven't called them that. E.g., you can start with the justice system and find many systems in and linking to that more generalized system. Thus, HT to Slap.
    Last edited by jmm99; 05-05-2011 at 05:59 PM. Reason: add PS

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •