Marlantes' problems (thankfully for his troops) seemed to manifest themselves after his service in Vietnam. The fact that (by his own admission) he became barely functional for a period indicates that problem (rather than a weakness). So then by all accounts Marlantes' service in Vietnam was good.
So it all comes back to selection then. My point is that one needs to set minimum levels for intellectual capability (SAT, ACT) and physical ability and spend most of the time the leadership and performance under stress tests ... with the odd psych test thrown in.
The first prize is that nobody falls apart either during or after combat service.
Second prize is that the officer can hold himself and his men together during that combat service and face what the future brings thereafter.
An absolute no-no is for an officer himself to fall apart during a combat tour or prove to be unable to provide the necessary leadership to help his men keep it together when under the stress of combat. Officer selection should attempt to screen for this.
Where this selection and screening fails and the officer fails to perform in combat (and on operations in general) he should be relieved immediately.
Bookmarks