Norway attacks: what happened and the implications (new title)

[motorfirebox]

I'm really not looking forward to the coverage. Breivik is just going to spout the same awful, racist crap that awful racists always spout.

[Fuchs]

Imagine some billionaire tracks all TV hours wasted on such a crap and then decides to buy the same qty of TV hours, same time slots, for something useful.

[Firn]

I'm really not looking forward to the coverage. Breivik is just going to spout the same awful, racist crap that awful racists always spout.

Somehow for such people it is always necessary to sacrifies the lives of other human beings for the-ir greater good. Usually the preperation of this entails "hard choices" and "sacrifices" on their part and the story of their personal effort becomes central.

The human mind has an amazing ability to make things up to suit its perceived needs. In this twisted logic the more horrible the crime which "had to be done" the more laudable the personal effort to achieve or overcome it for the "good" purpose can be.

[davidbfpo]

Hat tip to an occasional blogsite for a pointer to:

The Norweigan Central Evaluation Commission has published its review into police handling of the violent attacks of 22 July 2011 in Norway

Summary:

The main findings and recommendations are:

Notification by red alert: The police need to review and improve their alert system.

Situation reporting: The police need to improve situation reporting skills, focusing on verifying information, making sure the information is relevant for the superior lead, and highlighting information that is new since the last situation report.

Organisation, direction and coordination: There is mixed capability from area to area to respond to an event of this kind, and some areas had not updated their response plans. There is a need to consider introducing requirements as to minimum police staffing and skills, and there should be more attention on district-to-district peer support. The police needs to introduce a nation-wide emergency communications system due to communications problems experienced during the event, and several other IT and communications systems should be revamped. Police need to provide more training in incident management. There was good coordination between police and other partners on the ground. Overall, the Commission finds that the police carried out their duties as promptly as possible under the circumstances.

Management of evacuees and family/friends: Family and friends have been positive about the support they received from police in the immediate aftermath of the event, and centres for evacuees and family/friends were rapidly set up. But confusion was caused because several hotline numbers were released, people were confused about which one to use, and cooperation with the public health services caused frustration.

Public relations: There was confusion about which police district was handling press and media enquiries, and the Commission recommends that where more than one police district is affected by an incident the National Police Directorate should play a greater role in coordination. More user-friendly software is needed for posting information on the public police website, and insufficient attention was devoted to public relations challenges in the restoration-of-normality phase.

Health and safety: The Commission recommends that local Health and Safety plans be developed further.

Link to report:https://www.politi.no/vedlegg/rapport/Vedlegg_1665.pdf

Link to the pointer:http://rachelbriggs.wordpress.com/