Results 1 to 20 of 43

Thread: Naval strategy, naval power: uses & abuses

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Council Member wm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    On the Lunatic Fringe
    Posts
    1,237

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Fuchs View Post
    You really need to check out the meaning of "self-defense", for to you guys it seems to mean something like "we are allowed to kill you if we can make up an excuse".
    Fuchs,


    The citations used in your discussion of self defense apply to "domestic" law, or laws governing the interactions between individuals, in various USA jurisdictions, not to international law, or laws governing the interactions between nations or their agents.

    In traditional just war theory, actions normally considered to be homicides are justified by appeal to a domestic analogy, not a domestic identity. Your points about self defense might have more impact were they drawn from international law or law of land warfare cases rather than those dealing with domestic homicides in the USA.

    I am reminded of the story that in Bavaria, der Fhn may be used as a defense in a homicide case. Should one have allowed that defense to the leaders of the Third Reich during the Nrnberg trials? By parity of reasoning from your examples, it seems so.
    Vir prudens non contra ventum mingit
    The greatest educational dogma is also its greatest fallacy: the belief that what must be learned can necessarily be taught. — Sydney J. Harris

  2. #2
    Council Member Fuchs's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    3,189

    Default

    Dunno what's "Fhn", but international law (which is not universally respected in this forum) is about states.

    The IIRC rather customary maritime laws are hardly legalising killing pilots of a plane that didn't even open fire, for otherwise there would be massacres over all seas all the time.


    One of the ever-astonishing things in discussions with anglophone people about military stuff is how wrong it is to just assume that they apply basic human decency a, respect and civility when it comes to foreigner's lives.
    The whole idea that the shootdown of an airliner or even only the shootdown of a harmless fighter in peacetime could be justified is totally ridiculous.

    Those officers were intent on killing foreigners in wartime without any legal justification, period.
    The bomber pilots over AFG who bombed civilians 'due to muzzle flashes' were intent on killing and jumped on a flimsy excuse for killing.

    Besides; half of the people whom I've met discussing these events and claiming self-defence for the U.S. troops readily dismissed any legal argument whenever it pleased them in other cases.

    Now I could write a lot of much more harsh comments, but those events are old and by now everyone who hasn't a plank on his eye should know that those were gross mixtures of incompetence, lack of discipline and lack of respect for human lives.

Similar Threads

  1. Is It Time to Get Out of Afghanistan?
    By Cannoneer No. 4 in forum OEF - Afghanistan
    Replies: 161
    Last Post: 05-31-2011, 04:19 AM
  2. Marine Corps Vision and Strategy 2025
    By SWJED in forum Futurists & Theorists
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 07-01-2008, 05:12 PM
  3. Michele Flournoy on strategy
    By John T. Fishel in forum Government Agencies & Officials
    Replies: 27
    Last Post: 03-24-2008, 01:29 PM
  4. Towards a Theory of Applied Strategy in Tribal Society
    By SWJED in forum Futurists & Theorists
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 02-23-2008, 01:06 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •