Results 1 to 20 of 52

Thread: Will the UK lose the Falklands?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Council Member J Wolfsberger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    806

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Fuchs View Post
    It's a boogeyman. The largely irrelevant Falklands and their mythical 30-years old "we will soon produce oil there, but don't yet" symptom are being used to keep the militaryspending up.

    It's a ridiculous Warsaw Pact surrogate now that the Arabs aren't the boogeyman of the day any more.


    I have no respect for people who fall for such primitive scaremongering.
    In that case, you have to admit this is quite an accomplishment for British diplomats, getting Kirchner to blow this up so their colleagues in the military could press for budget increases.

    Actually, I think Red Rat has it mostly right. Kirchner has manufactured a crisis partly because the domestic situation in Argentina is almost Grecian. But I also think her government's major purpose is using this as a lever to pry some concessions out of the UK regarding exploitation of the oil.

    Regardless, as a Bolivaran in good standing she was guaranteed the diplomatic support of Columbia, Brazil and Cuba. I doubt they'd back her to the point of armed conflict.
    Last edited by J Wolfsberger; 02-15-2012 at 09:45 PM.
    John Wolfsberger, Jr.

    An unruffled person with some useful skills.

  2. #2
    Council Member ganulv's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Berkshire County, Mass.
    Posts
    896

    Default You take what you can get, I guess.

    Quote Originally Posted by J Wolfsberger View Post
    Regardless, as a Bolivaran in good standing she was guaranteed the diplomatic support of Columbia, Brazil and Cuba. I doubt they'd back her to the point of armed conflict.
    Since the Columbian government is tied up dealing with a decades–long insurgency and the Cuban government is tied up dealing with a neighbor whose stated policy is regime change and who also happens to be the most powerful nation in the history of the world I think we can be pretty sure that those two aren’t going to go to blows for Argentina. And I believe that the Brazilians would rather not have their carrier destroyed by the Brits. But you know who Kirchner can count on? Sean Penn.
    If you don’t read the newspaper, you are uninformed; if you do read the newspaper, you are misinformed. – Mark Twain (attributed)

  3. #3
    Council Member carl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Denver on occasion
    Posts
    2,460

    Default

    ganulv:

    That was an almost perfectly constructed paragraph and I laughed like hell at the end.
    "We fight, get beat, rise, and fight again." Gen. Nathanael Greene

  4. #4
    Council Member davidbfpo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    13,366

    Default

    Ganulv:
    But you know who Kirchner can count on? Sean Penn.
    Ah, we still have 'The Handbag' in reserve and SSN(s).
    davidbfpo

  5. #5
    Council Member J Wolfsberger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    806

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ganulv View Post
    Since the Columbian government is tied up dealing with a decades–long insurgency and the Cuban government is tied up dealing with a neighbor whose stated policy is regime change and who also happens to be the most powerful nation in the history of the world I think we can be pretty sure that those two aren’t going to go to blows for Argentina. And I believe that the Brazilians would rather not have their carrier destroyed by the Brits. But you know who Kirchner can count on? Sean Penn.
    I got a laugh as well.

    Unfortunately, I suffered a brain f--- when I wrote the post. I meant "Venezuela, Brazil and Cuba."

    Next thing you know, I'll start to get crotchety.
    John Wolfsberger, Jr.

    An unruffled person with some useful skills.

  6. #6
    Council Member Stan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Estonia
    Posts
    3,817

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ganulv View Post
    But you know who Kirchner can count on? Sean Penn.
    Matt, That's a keeper

    Quote Originally Posted by J Wolfsberger View Post
    I got a laugh as well.
    Unfortunately, I suffered a brain f--- when I wrote the post. I meant "Venezuela, Brazil and Cuba."
    Hey John, You old buzzard - we hate all of those dudes (well, at least until we get another president with another agenda).

    Where have you been anyway ? On some sort of sabbatical

    Quote Originally Posted by J Wolfsberger View Post
    Next thing you know, I'll start to get crotchety.
    As I needed to check the definition of that word, I ran across far too many definitions at the Urban Dictionary and decided on the following

    1. Of or pertaining to the crotchular region.

    2. Of a sexually promiscuous nature.

    1. Ray-Ray was experiencing a crotchety itch, so he jiggied on down to the clinic on the corner.
    This, BTW, has jack to do with this thread !
    If you want to blend in, take the bus

  7. #7
    Council Member J Wolfsberger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    806

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Stan View Post
    Matt, That's a keeper



    Hey John, You old buzzard - we hate all of those dudes (well, at least until we get another president with another agenda).

    Where have you been anyway ? On some sort of sabbatical



    As I needed to check the definition of that word, I ran across far too many definitions at the Urban Dictionary and decided on the following



    This, BTW, has jack to do with this thread !
    I got tied up in a series of other activities.

    As for "crotchety," more along the lines of:

    1.irritable: irritable and difficult to please

    The proper emoticon is:
    John Wolfsberger, Jr.

    An unruffled person with some useful skills.

  8. #8
    Council Member Stan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Estonia
    Posts
    3,817

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by J Wolfsberger View Post
    I got tied up in a series of other activities.

    As for "crotchety," more along the lines of:

    1.irritable: irritable and difficult to please

    The proper emoticon is:
    Sorry about that John
    Glad to have you back and pissed off !
    If you want to blend in, take the bus

  9. #9
    Moderator Steve Blair's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Montana
    Posts
    3,195

    Default

    Maybe we can just send them Sean Penn and call it good. Please?
    "On the plains and mountains of the American West, the United States Army had once learned everything there was to learn about hit-and-run tactics and guerrilla warfare."
    T.R. Fehrenbach This Kind of War

Similar Threads

  1. Why democracies don't lose insurgencies
    By Cavguy in forum RFIs & Members' Projects
    Replies: 79
    Last Post: 06-11-2009, 03:23 PM
  2. How to Win in Iraq and How to Lose
    By SWJED in forum US Policy, Interest, and Endgame
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 03-30-2007, 03:35 PM
  3. How We Lose
    By SWJED in forum Global Issues & Threats
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 01-25-2007, 04:44 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •