Results 1 to 20 of 156

Thread: Nine children among 16 dead after US serviceman attacks villagers

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    89

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Stan View Post
    Jep, a strange twist and analogy.



    Seems the same is being used to defend the SSG. I would assume they are referring to fingerprints or perhaps even gunshot/powder residue.

    In a place where a soldier fires his weapon a gazillion times a day, the evidence of gunshot residue is a joke. One would assume his fingerprints are probably still on his weapon, but, I would hope he has had a bath in the last week. This sort of Sierra is weak and yet still stands up in a courts martial
    Stan, this is what we call the "CSI effect" in the civilian criminal law world.

    Jurors often have extremely high and unrealistic expections for forensic science after watching the CSI series. Usually a good prosecutor can keep the jury's eye on the ball and cut through the muck, but its never a guarantee.

    Normally one would think a military panel would be somewhat more immune to this effect, mainly due to its higher education composition.

  2. #2
    Council Member Stan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Estonia
    Posts
    3,817

    Default

    Hey Stan,
    (I always wanted to say that without being accused of talking to myself )

    Quote Originally Posted by stanleywinthrop View Post
    Stan, this is what we call the "CSI effect" in the civilian criminal law world.

    Jurors often have extremely high and unrealistic expections for forensic science after watching the CSI series. Usually a good prosecutor can keep the jury's eye on the ball and cut through the muck, but its never a guarantee.

    Normally one would think a military panel would be somewhat more immune to this effect, mainly due to its higher education composition.
    If we even had half of the widgets they do on CSI (sigh).
    We've managed to become part of the judicial process here when it comes to forensics and post blast. It has been a real PITA having arguments with lawyers and defense in a subject area we are considered to be subject matter experts. We are still trying to put away our version of a uni bomber seven years later, once and for all.

    What could possibly be gained from going to the scene weeks later ? His defense lawyer is said to be going to Afghanistan soon (not that that's the healthiest idea). The dead are buried and the shell casings long gone at the black market for scrap metal.

    Regards, Stan
    If you want to blend in, take the bus

  3. #3
    Council Member carl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Denver on occasion
    Posts
    2,460

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Stan View Post
    What could possibly be gained from going to the scene weeks later ? His defense lawyer is said to be going to Afghanistan soon (not that that's the healthiest idea). The dead are buried and the shell casings long gone at the black market for scrap metal.

    Regards, Stan
    He won't find anything which may be the point. I am guessing, but would that be to the advantage of the defense if defense council argued that when he went to the scene despite strenuous efforts yadda yadda yadda there was nothing to be found, therefore how much credence can you give to the prosecutions evidence. Also could he use dangerous conditions to advantage in order to suggest that conditions are intolerable and would stress the most reasonable person beyond endurance?

    Cue U.P. Mike, stage right.
    Last edited by carl; 03-21-2012 at 08:53 PM.
    "We fight, get beat, rise, and fight again." Gen. Nathanael Greene

  4. #4
    Council Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    4,021

    Default Carl:

    No, no comments today.

    Have to confess to drinking - a bit of this:



    However, if someone can point me to an online copy of the original NASD arbitration award, I'd be thankful to him or her. Despite looking for that document on and off yesterday and today, I couldn't find it.

    Regards

    Mike

  5. #5
    Council Member carl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Denver on occasion
    Posts
    2,460

    Default

    Mike:

    This link leads to a PDF called a broker check report. Click on the blue letters that say Get Detailed Report.

    http://brokercheck.finra.org/Individ...ndvlIACtgry=-1
    "We fight, get beat, rise, and fight again." Gen. Nathanael Greene

  6. #6
    Council Member carl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Denver on occasion
    Posts
    2,460

    Default

    Bloomberg seems to covering this story well.

    http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-0...r-says-2-.html

    In the above linked story the defense attorney mentions lack of eyewitnesses, lack of forensic evidence, putting the war on trail and brain injury. I will wait for Mike's opinion as to how that may or may not show what the defense line will be.
    "We fight, get beat, rise, and fight again." Gen. Nathanael Greene

  7. #7
    Council Member davidbfpo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    13,366

    Default

    I am intrigued at the accused's defence lawyer's declared intention to travel to Afghanistan, presumably to examine the scene and interview witnesses.

    Who is going to protect him in Afghanistan, notably in the village?

    Can't imagine any insurance company will relish providing high risk cover.
    davidbfpo

Similar Threads

  1. Pakistani people OK with drone attacks?
    By BayonetBrant in forum South Asia
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 11-03-2012, 04:18 PM
  2. Attacks in Iraq Down Considerably
    By SWJED in forum Blog Watch
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 01-23-2006, 10:33 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •