Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Mission Can't-Complete / O'Hanlon

  1. #1
    Council Member Fuchs's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    3,189

    Default Mission Can't-Complete / O'Hanlon

    http://council.smallwarsjournal.com/...ad.php?t=15303

    I was rooting for O'Hanlon. I wanted this leading defense intellectual(...)
    Let's get the facts right, for a change:

    O'Hanlon is NO "leading defense intellectual" and never has been!

    He's a primitive leading war cheerleader, accomplished attention-seeker and has been the media/thinktank darling pundit for years.

    "Overrated" doesn't even come close to describe him.
    Basically ALL he ever wrote was primitive war cheerleading crap, he only has skill in regard to appear as if he was an expert on anything other than getting attention. Whatever glimpse of thinking sensibly he ever showed; it was designed to make him a bit less assailable and make him appear more sensible than he is.
    He has consistently been wrong.



    The U.S. will inevitably continue with military adventure stupidities if it cannot tell good advisers from horrible ones!


    Stay stupid and delusional at your own risk.
    I know for a fact that there were enough smart people who knew and said publicly in advance that certain stupidities were stupid and would be costly, and they are still being ignored as well as possible!

  2. #2
    Council Member Ken White's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    8,060

    Default Cheerleaders are not necessarily bright but they have nice smiles.

    Quote Originally Posted by Fuchs View Post
    O'Hanlon is NO "leading defense intellectual" and never has been!
    True. Very true.
    He has consistently been wrong.
    As is that...
    I know for a fact that there were enough smart people who knew and said publicly in advance that certain stupidities were stupid and would be costly, and they are still being ignored as well as possible!
    Also true.

    Those who have nice smile that accord with happiness (or a set line of thought...) get more visibility in the media than those who know what they're doing but won't play along...

  3. #3
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    155

    Default

    The same people seem to circle around the same positions. I have nothing against any one of them in particular, but we never improve it seems because there is no new thinking on anything.

    (That is a completely vapid comment. This really is a test comment because the rest of the site will not allow me to post a comment. As soon as I do, I get logged out. Anyone else with the same problem?)

  4. #4
    Council Member davidbfpo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    11,794

    Default SWJ Commenting

    Madhu asked:
    That is a completely vapid comment. This really is a test comment because the rest of the site will not allow me to post a comment. As soon as I do, I get logged out. Anyone else with the same problem?)
    Yes, the problem with commenting on SWJ articles has been reported for a week now and has been referred to those who run the system.
    davidbfpo

Similar Threads

  1. Afghanistan: Canadians in Action
    By SWJED in forum OEF - Afghanistan
    Replies: 83
    Last Post: 03-15-2014, 02:32 PM
  2. Will the Trigger-Puller shift mission?
    By Abu Suleyman in forum Trigger Puller
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 10-13-2007, 03:53 PM
  3. The US Army's Limited War Mission and Social Science Research - March 1962
    By Jedburgh in forum Social Sciences, Moral, and Religious
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 10-12-2007, 03:00 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •