What evidence supports this grand assertion? Portions of the electorate are inflamed, the media is inflamed, the political class is inflamed, some middle class commenters appear inflamed, but I have seen a lot of complaints too against the type of person the diplomat is supposed to represent.
The vast majority of people in India likely have never even heard of this case, I bet or it is of a peripheral concern.
But what evidence supports either claim, yours or mine? Hard evidence?
Bookmarks