Results 1 to 13 of 13

Thread: WSJ - A Primer for American Military Intervention

  1. #1
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    East Coast, USA
    Posts
    23

    Default WSJ - A Primer for American Military Intervention

    Nicely written piece...especially where he writes about, "Abstain from nation-building, transformation, and counterinsurgency..."

    http://ebird.osd.mil/ebfiles/e20120705897205.html
    "We're here to preserve democracy, not practice it." from the move, Crimson Tide

  2. #2
    Moderator Steve Blair's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Montana
    Posts
    3,195

    Default

    This link requires .mil access.
    "On the plains and mountains of the American West, the United States Army had once learned everything there was to learn about hit-and-run tactics and guerrilla warfare."
    T.R. Fehrenbach This Kind of War

  3. #3
    Council Member Bob's World's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    2,706

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by socal1200r View Post
    Nicely written piece...especially where he writes about, "Abstain from nation-building, transformation, and counterinsurgency..."

    http://ebird.osd.mil/ebfiles/e20120705897205.html
    Which brings us full circle back to "FID."
    Robert C. Jones
    Intellectus Supra Scientia
    (Understanding is more important than Knowledge)

    "The modern COIN mindset is when one arrogantly goes to some foreign land and attempts to make those who live there a lesser version of one's self. The FID mindset is when one humbly goes to some foreign land and seeks first to understand, and then to help in some small way for those who live there to be the best version of their own self." Colonel Robert C. Jones, US Army Special Forces (Retired)

  4. #4
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    East Coast, USA
    Posts
    23

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Steve Blair View Post
    This link requires .mil access.
    Wall Street Journal
    July 5, 2012

    A Primer For American Military Intervention

    With the heart of an infantryman, the president must feel what Churchill called 'stress of soul' for each of the wounded and the dead.

    By Mark Helprin

    In either 2013 or 2017, a new president will take office. The economy notwithstanding, the world will remain a dangerous place, and military intervention may yet be necessary. Of late America has not fared well in this, and the new president should wipe the slate clean, making sure that we do not fight wars that we need not fight, or lose those that we must.

    Although Democrats pretend to have won in Afghanistan so they may retreat, and Republicans so as to absolve themselves of laying the foundation for defeat, withdrawal under fire is not usually a sign of success.
    [clipped for copyvio]
    Last edited by davidbfpo; 07-05-2012 at 08:23 PM. Reason: Copyright violations...sorry...we can't put out more than their extract
    "We're here to preserve democracy, not practice it." from the move, Crimson Tide

  5. #5
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    East Coast, USA
    Posts
    23

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bob's World View Post
    Which brings us full circle back to "FID."
    I'm far from being an "expert" in this, but if you look at the current "phases" of a military operation, and overlap them with the D-I-M-E construct of the instruments of national power (Diplomatic, Informational, Military, Economic), big M really only comes into play in the middle phases (Seize the initiative, Dominate, and to a lesser extent, Stabilize), not the ones at either end (Shape, Deter, Enable civil authority). All other phases need to have D-I-m-E as their driving forces, not M. Does the military conduct Shape, Deter, and Enable civil authority activities? Sure we do, but again, it should be in a little M, not big M, construct. I think FID would fall into the Shape/Deter/Enable civil authorities bucket of activities, and should be done with the minimum number of military resources required.

    As for "nation-building" and "transformation", the U.S. military clearly is out of our lane in those areas. We could provide for a secure environment for those activities to initially take place, but we should NOT be conducting those activities themselves, and certainly not be providing long-term security.
    "We're here to preserve democracy, not practice it." from the move, Crimson Tide

  6. #6
    Moderator Steve Blair's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Montana
    Posts
    3,195

    Default

    Sorry to have clipped that, but the full article is behind the WSJ "pay" firewall. We can't post the whole thing due to copyright. If it's republished elsewhere in a free format, then we can link to it.
    "On the plains and mountains of the American West, the United States Army had once learned everything there was to learn about hit-and-run tactics and guerrilla warfare."
    T.R. Fehrenbach This Kind of War

  7. #7
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    East Coast, USA
    Posts
    23

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Steve Blair View Post
    Sorry to have clipped that, but the full article is behind the WSJ "pay" firewall. We can't post the whole thing due to copyright. If it's republished elsewhere in a free format, then we can link to it.
    Sorry about that...let me look around...
    "We're here to preserve democracy, not practice it." from the move, Crimson Tide

  8. #8
    Moderator Steve Blair's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Montana
    Posts
    3,195

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by socal1200r View Post
    Sorry about that...let me look around...
    No worries. It's a shame, because it wasn't a bad piece.
    "On the plains and mountains of the American West, the United States Army had once learned everything there was to learn about hit-and-run tactics and guerrilla warfare."
    T.R. Fehrenbach This Kind of War

  9. #9
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Rocky Mtn Empire
    Posts
    473

    Default

    No FID

    WE can't resume training HN militaries & gov'ts to operate soley against their fellow citizens, as the "internal" in FID declares.

  10. #10
    Council Member Bob's World's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    2,706

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Old Eagle View Post
    No FID

    WE can't resume training HN militarize & gov'ts to operate solely against their fellow citizens, as the "internal" in FID declares.
    Actually, that is not what the "Internal" in FID means. It means what they do internal to their country to defend against threats of all origins, foreign or domestic. But I do agree that we need to make a major change in how we think about building partner capacity designed to primarily keep their own populaces in check (as we are doing so many places in the Middle East, and what the Army is currently hanging a large portion of their rationale for sustaining war fighting force structure in times of peace). Better the smaller efforts that focus primarily on building partner professionalism, which in my opinion is the most noteworthy aspect of what we have been doing in the Philippines in recent years.

    The opposite of FID is some notion that one needs to go abroad and pre-emptively attack nations or organizations that they think might attack them some day...
    Robert C. Jones
    Intellectus Supra Scientia
    (Understanding is more important than Knowledge)

    "The modern COIN mindset is when one arrogantly goes to some foreign land and attempts to make those who live there a lesser version of one's self. The FID mindset is when one humbly goes to some foreign land and seeks first to understand, and then to help in some small way for those who live there to be the best version of their own self." Colonel Robert C. Jones, US Army Special Forces (Retired)

  11. #11
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by socal1200r View Post
    Sorry about that...let me look around...
    Did you find it? It is interesting.

  12. #12
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    East Coast, USA
    Posts
    23

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by call12223 View Post
    Did you find it? It is interesting.
    Negative Ghostrider...my internet research skills are somewhat limited, and I haven't been able to find a "free", non-copyrighted version...guess we could always ping the author directly and ask his permission to reprint it here?
    "We're here to preserve democracy, not practice it." from the move, Crimson Tide

  13. #13
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    East Coast, USA
    Posts
    23

    Default

    From JP 3-22: Foreign Internal Defense: Participation by civilian and military agencies of a government in any of the action programs taken by another government or other designated organization to free and protect its society from subversion, lawlessness, insurgency, terrorism, and other threats to its security. Also called FID.
    As has been mentioned, the "I" in FID implies that the partner nation is trying to take care of its own business, from threats that are either external or internal in origin, with help from a foreign partner (i.e. the US). If the partner nation govt is an ally of the US, and if the threat is coming from an internal source, even if it's from its own citizens, that still meets the definition of FID.

    Here's a twist on what's going on in Syria. If the US actively supported the anti-Assad forces there, by supply them with weapons, logistics help, intel, basically everything short of boots on the ground, would we be then supporting an "insurgency", as defined in JP 3-22? Insurgency: The organized use of subversion and violence by a group or movement that seeks to overthrow or force change of a governing authority. Insurgency can also refer to the group itself. (JP 3-24)

    Based on that definition, I think we would be, so an insurgency could be a good thing or a bad thing. Just depends on which side of the Kalishnikov you're on I guess...
    "We're here to preserve democracy, not practice it." from the move, Crimson Tide

Similar Threads

  1. Syria: a civil war (closed)
    By tequila in forum Middle East
    Replies: 663
    Last Post: 08-05-2012, 06:35 AM
  2. SWJ Small Wars Survey 2012
    By MikeF in forum Global Issues & Threats
    Replies: 89
    Last Post: 01-19-2012, 11:57 PM
  3. Iraqis Adapt British Military Academy as Model
    By SWJED in forum The Whole News
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-27-2006, 09:16 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •