Results 1 to 19 of 19

Thread: Essay - UN Unable to Address Modern Conflicts

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #11
    Council Member TheCurmudgeon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Woodbridge, VA
    Posts
    1,117

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Entropy View Post
    The essential problem is sovereignty. Democratic nations don't want to give up sovereignty to an unelected and unaccountable foreign institution.
    True, but they have no problem attempting to impose their concept of "popular sovereignty" on other states under the guise of Universal Human Rights.

    For non-democratic nations the loss of sovereignty would threaten their hold on power.
    I am not sure that is accurate. What some would view as non-democratic leaders get elected all the time. But I do believe that is how "non-democratic" states see it. The main threat coming from the "popular sovereignty" contingent who would limit any regime's ability to impose its will on its population in ways democratic leaders might not be openly willing to agree with.

    The UN thus becomes a political tool to wield in the service of the national interest.
    Unfortunate reality.

    I still have to agree with others here that we are better off with it than without it. That does not mean that it could not stand a little tweaking.
    Last edited by TheCurmudgeon; 08-21-2012 at 01:31 PM.
    "I can change almost anything ... but I can't change human nature."

    Jon Osterman/Dr. Manhattan
    ---

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •