Results 1 to 20 of 49

Thread: Diplomatic security after terrorists kill US Ambassador in Benghazi, Libya

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #21
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Durban, South Africa
    Posts
    3,902

    Default

    Bill, after the Camp Bastion attack two Marine generals get (effectively) fired.

    After this debacle it all gets swept under the carpet.

    I keep telling Africans who tell me they are confused by the actions of the US not to worry as they are not nearly as confused as the Americans themselves are.


    Quote Originally Posted by Bill Moore View Post
    http://www.intelligence.senate.gov/b...4/benghazi.pdf

    Published January 15, 2014

    U.S. Senate Select Committee on Intelligence Review of the Attacks on U.S. Facilities.

    Hopefully this report will both raise some concerns with Department of State security practices and quell the endless conspiracy theories. Mistakes were clearly made, but some mistakes have been mis-contributed to intentional action versus the fog of war.

    It clearly states there were numerous and substantiated reports of Al-Qaeda linked groups operating in Libya, and the increasing threat they posed to the U.S. facilities. The CIA acted on these threats and beefed up the security at their facilities, while the Ambassodor's request for increased security were not acted upon.

    The military was preparing to sending troops, but by the time they were prepared to deploy the folks at Benghazi were long evacuated (that is reality that most people in the military get when you're deploying from a cold start).



    The Annex was the CIA facility, their security personnel did respond as quickly as possible.

    At least some the attackers were well trained, this clearly wasn't poorly trained militia member casually hip firing a mortar.


    I'm quite familiar with chaos and confusion in the heat of the moment, but this wasn't that. The red flag was sent up prior to the event more than once and it was ignored. I have a hard time accepting that department leadership ignored their people in harm's way when they requested a modest increase in security. The report later went on to say there was considerable confusion on who had the authority within State to make the decision.

    - Two FAST teams were ordered to deploy, one for Benghazi, but by the time they were ready, and then add the flight time it would have been too late (post evacuation)
    - Special Operations units were ordered to deploy, but they couldn't get there until after the U.S. personnel in Benghazi were evacuated.
    Last edited by JMA; 01-19-2014 at 01:13 PM.

Similar Threads

  1. UK National Security Strategy
    By Red Rat in forum Europe
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 10-18-2010, 09:47 PM
  2. Toward Sustainable Security in Iraq and the Endgame
    By Rob Thornton in forum US Policy, Interest, and Endgame
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: 06-30-2008, 12:24 PM
  3. Coupla Questions From a Newbie
    By kwillcox in forum RFIs & Members' Projects
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 02-09-2007, 07:32 AM
  4. Developing Iraq’s Security Sector: The CPA’s Experience
    By Jedburgh in forum Training & Education
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 01-05-2006, 05:03 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •