Results 1 to 20 of 31

Thread: Equipment list

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Council Member Fuchs's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    3,189

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JMA View Post
    So now you know where the Germans got it wrong.
    Patrol focus versus Stotrupp focus. Guess who won.
    Answer.

  2. #2
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    AUT+RUS
    Posts
    87

    Default

    That's a topic with a strong cultural angle. Look at Soviet infantry during WW2, or the Viet Cong. Handful of semitchki or rice, kanteen-like thing, gun (or not) with a little bit of ammo. No way any Western troops would run around like that.


    Let's try it, graded VITAL > USEFUL > NICE TO HAVE:

    (1) -- Stay warm, stay dry, stay fed and watered, stay healthy, on a level that allows you to maintain operational effectiveness.

    (2a) -- Basic Personal Field Tools (knife, spade, multitool, canteen - whatever needed to assists in achieving (1), can vary widely with ops environ)

    (2b) -- Basic Personal Medkit (generally oriented towards covering small lesions as they happen every day to keep them from getting sore, but also a wound closure kit to stop a bleeding long enough till a medic arrives)

    (2c) -- Smartphone. Not as absurd as it sounds. Even when not used as a com device it still is very useful.

    (3) -- Optional special mobility equiment (e.g. skis, or snow shoes, or mountaineering equipment)

    (4) -- Weapon. Can be all kind of things. Maybe better called "Offensive Mission Equipment". Can be a laser designator, can be a barrel and extra ammo for the machine gun. Can be a rugged notebook with some EW or cyber magic. Not limited to an assault carbine.

    (5) -- Optional mission equipment: Navigation + Communication (as far as not provided by smartphone), Night Vision Equipment, NBC Equipment

    (6) -- Optional special load carrying equipment (e.g. a hiking trailer)

    (10) -- Optional armor
    Last edited by Distiller; 12-01-2012 at 12:34 PM.

  3. #3
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    3,169

    Default

    Posted by Distiller

    That's a topic with a strong cultural angle. Look at Soviet infantry during WW2, or the Viet Cong. Handful of semitchki or rice, kanteen-like thing, gun (or not) with a little bit of ammo. No way any Western troops would run around like that.
    Of course we could and we have; just not in recent years. You have to put it in context, if we were fighting in the U.S. against an occupying power we would become the guerrilla army and be able to live off the land the goodwill (or coerced will) of the people to support us.

    Don't confuse today's industrial Army with what we could be, Americans are as hard as any other nationality when they need to be.

    We go heavy today due to risk adverse leaders and the mindset that if it is available we ought to carry it with us because you never know. In a different scenario the risk adverse leaders would be privates and we wouldn't have the kit to carry with us even we wanted to.

Similar Threads

  1. Adding "Add all to cart" feature to Reading List page
    By Rose in forum Small Wars Council / Journal
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 09-08-2010, 02:07 PM
  2. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 01-18-2007, 01:57 PM
  3. U.S. Army Battling To Save Equipment
    By SWJED in forum The Whole News
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 12-07-2006, 09:51 AM
  4. Equipment: Congress Shortchanges Army, Marines
    By SWJED in forum Equipment & Capabilities
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 07-03-2006, 02:20 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •