Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 40 of 286

Thread: Watching Russian Air & Sea Activity

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    35,749

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by OUTLAW 09 View Post
    Russian mini sub found sunk in Swedish waters by Ocean X------

    Abandoned foreign midget submarine discovered in Swedish waters. http://www.expressen.se/nyheter/fram...venskt-vatten/

    Divers report cyrillic leters on hull. Appears to be in good condition with minimal damage, 20 meters long

    Some screengrabs from stream at http://www.expressen.se/nyheter/fram...venskt-vatten/

    Ocean X found the sub not the Swedish Navy
    oceanexplorer.se/
    for a news release in english

    Some say the crew might still be in the sub and dead.
    Press release on the sunken "Russian Sub" in the Swedish territorial waters
    by @OcanXteam pic.twitter.com/7SFNaYsaE6

    27 July: A Russian mini-submarine has been discovered in Sweden's territorial waters not far from the Swedish coast http://www.oceanexplorer.se

    Video: A mini-sub has been found in Swedish waters - the crew are presumed to have perished inside http://www.expressen.se/tv/nyheter/i...venskt-vatten/ … via

    Ocean X: "We fear that the crew has not been able to save themselves when the sub went down, submarine is intact"
    http://freebeacon.com/national-secur...swedens-coast/ …?
    Last edited by OUTLAW 09; 07-27-2015 at 07:42 PM.

  2. #2
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    35,749

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by OUTLAW 09 View Post
    Press release on the sunken "Russian Sub" in the Swedish territorial waters
    by @OcanXteam pic.twitter.com/7SFNaYsaE6

    27 July: A Russian mini-submarine has been discovered in Sweden's territorial waters not far from the Swedish coast http://www.oceanexplorer.se

    Video: A mini-sub has been found in Swedish waters - the crew are presumed to have perished inside http://www.expressen.se/tv/nyheter/i...venskt-vatten/ … via

    Ocean X: "We fear that the crew has not been able to save themselves when the sub went down, submarine is intact"
    http://freebeacon.com/national-secur...swedens-coast/ …?
    AND now intelligence collection kicks in--it is being reported today that the discovered sunken sub "might" be a Russian sub from 1916 that supposedly was hit by a Swedish freighter and sunk in 1916---

    BUT what is strange is the video does not depict a "standard sub form even from 1916" but rather one of a "typical research submersible" used by Russain intel gathering.

    Secondly, the only released video does not depict a "1916 damaged sub meaning physically hit by a freighter" covered in over 100 years worth of silt as it was found in a fairly normal current areas which would have been carrying silt and there was no ocean "growth" on the metal parts in the video depicting over 100 years of being in the ocean.

    Thirdly, the salvage crew had a long remote recon session a number of times but only a short video was played AND in their interview they openly stated and it was not contradicted "there was no apparent damage to the sub and it was intact and was approximately 20 meters long"--certainly not the standard length of a 1916 sub.

    So how can a 1916 struck by a freighter and sunk Russian sub NOT have "no apparent damage and being intact". Beside in 1916 what was a Russian sub doing in Swedish territorial waters anyway?

    AND they informed the Swedish Navy of the find last Wednesday and the information was leaked yesterday--if a "damaged 1916 sub" why the long wait to reveal it?

    Fourthly, if in fact a Russian modern recon/spy sub and it is intact THEN the intel wealth of that sub is massive and extensive.

    Am personally betting that they are using a cover story now to allow for the ship to be recovered and not have to answer to Russian demands to return the ship and potential dead crew. So the 1916 sub becomes the story and then we will hear there is no need to recover it and it will be left as a naval burial site and so marked in the Baltic maps much as other naval sinkings are being handled from WW2.

    If it was truly announced that it is a recon/spy sub and publicly recovered then Russia could in fact legally demand it's return and the formal burial of the crew AND Russia under Putin would back those demands by an aggressive show of force to back up their demands as they have been doing for over a year in the entire Baltic Sea area.
    Last edited by OUTLAW 09; 07-28-2015 at 09:29 AM.

  3. #3
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    35,749

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by OUTLAW 09 View Post
    AND now intelligence collection kicks in--it is being reported today that the discovered sunken sub "might" be a Russian sub from 1916 that supposedly was hit by a Swedish freighter and sunk in 1916---

    BUT what is strange is the video does not depict a "standard sub form even from 1916" but rather one of a "typical research submersible" used by Russain intel gathering.

    Secondly, the only released video does not depict a "1916 damaged sub meaning physically hit by a freighter" covered in over 100 years worth of silt as it was found in a fairly normal current areas which would have been carrying silt and there was no ocean "growth" on the metal parts in the video depicting over 100 years of being in the ocean.

    Thirdly, the salvage crew had a long remote recon session a number of times but only a short video was played AND in their interview they openly stated and it was not contradicted "there was no apparent damage to the sub and it was intact and was approximately 20 meters long"--certainly not the standard length of a 1916 sub.

    So how can a 1916 struck by a freighter and sunk Russian sub NOT have "no apparent damage and being intact". Beside in 1916 what was a Russian sub doing in Swedish territorial waters anyway?

    AND they informed the Swedish Navy of the find last Wednesday and the information was leaked yesterday--if a "damaged 1916 sub" why the long wait to reveal it?

    Fourthly, if in fact a Russian modern recon/spy sub and it is intact THEN the intel wealth of that sub is massive and extensive.

    Am personally betting that they are using a cover story now to allow for the ship to be recovered and not have to answer to Russian demands to return the ship and potential dead crew. So the 1916 sub becomes the story and then we will hear there is no need to recover it and it will be left as a naval burial site and so marked in the Baltic maps much as other naval sinkings are being handled from WW2.

    If it was truly announced that it is a recon/spy sub and publicly recovered then Russia could in fact legally demand it's return and the formal burial of the crew AND Russia under Putin would back those demands by an aggressive show of force to back up their demands as they have been doing for over a year in the entire Baltic Sea area.
    A number of odd items about the so called 1916 Russian sub--she was evidently lost on a daily patrol meaning out in the morning back in the evening--so really a four hour jaunt in one direction at the speed in those days of 6 to 8knots.

    Russian accounts do not reflect those patrols as being in Swedish waters basically an neutral country in 1916.

    Secondly today the Swedish Navy had a combat patrol vessel anchored near the site.

    This TASS press release from today is interesting as it appears that the Russians want it declared a mass burial site to be protected and not raised.

    If I were the Russian GRU I would be dying to get divers onto the wreck.

    1. this area was one of the areas recently intensively searched in 2014 by the Swedish Navy

    2. a "so called Russian ocean research/recovery ship" was parked in the Baltic for a number of days during that search phase for a number of days and then left for Kaliningrad.

    3. notice the Ocean X did not want to deny or confirm the 1916 sub theory


    MOSCOW, July 28. /TASS/. Russian search and rescue workers will offer any conceivable assistance to their Scandinavian counterparts in gathering information that might provide clues to the fate of a submarine wreck just discovered off Sweden, the head of the expedition Respects to Great Victory’s Ships, Konstantin Bogdanov, told TASS on Tuesday.

    Earlier, Sweden’s divers from the Ocean X-team said they had spotted the wreck of a foreign submarine bearing Cyrillic letters on the hull. Scandinavian experts are still uncertain about the date when the submarine was lost. Some speculate that the sub in question is Russia’s The Som, which sank in 1916.

    "According to the photos available it looks pretty much like The Som submarine, which sank in 1916 following a collision with a surface ship, but further inquiries are still to confirm that. At this point there is no information about the depth of the sea in the area where the submarine was found. The depth permitting, it might be possible to obtain clearer images and declare the site as a mass grave," Bogdanov said.

    He speculated it might be possible to arrange for a joint ceremony to dispatch ships to the sight and hold a funeral service there.

    "That’s a question of good will and of cooperation by the two countries. If the issue on the agenda is to commemorate people who perished nearly one hundred years ago, there is no politics involved. We are prepared for a joint expedition and will soon try to contact the Swedish side," Bogdanov said.

    He recalled that Russian divers had a certain record of such joint expeditions in cooperation with partners in Bulgaria, Estonia, and Finland. In cooperation with Bulgaria Russian specialists identified the Russian destroyer The Lieutenant Pushchin, which sank during World War I. A while later a memorial service was conducted on the site and divers attached a memorial plaque with the names of all crew to the ship’s hull.

    The Som-class mini-submarines (replicas of the US submarine Fulton) was a series of Russian submarines build in 1904-1906. The first one, which lent its name to the whole series, was built in the United States in 1901 and handed over to Russia. According to witnesses in May 1916 The Som sank after collision with a Swedish ship.

  4. #4
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    35,749

    Default

    http://www.themoscowtimes.com/busine...to/526277.html

    New Russian Naval Doctrine Enshrines Confrontation With NATO

    By Matthew Bodner

    Jul. 27 2015 21:19

    While the new doctrine is ambitious, Russia may find it difficult to enact.

    President Vladimir Putin on Sunday approved amendments to Russia’s naval doctrine that prioritize the development of Russian positions in strategic seas around the world, according to the Kremlin website.

    The updated doctrine takes advantage of a huge injection of funds into Russia's naval strength to shift the emphasis of Russian naval operations toward so-called blue water operations — deployments of naval force far beyond Russian coastal waters into the world’s oceans, with a focus on the Atlantic and Mediterranean.

    By focusing on the Atlantic, the amended doctrine asserts the Russian navy’s role as a countering force to what military planners in Moscow see as an encroaching NATO military alliance on Russian borders and interests.

    Deputy Prime Minister Dmitry Rogozin, who oversees the defense industry, presented the updated doctrine to Putin on Sunday and cited two reasons for the update: “above all, the changing international situation; and, of course, strengthening Russia’s position as a sea power,” according to remarks posted on the Kremlin website.

    President Putin praised the revised doctrine, calling it a vital strategic document “to provide our country with an integral, consistent naval policy that will protect Russia’s interests.”

    Retired Russian Navy Commander Maxim Shepovalenko, a military expert at the Center for the Analysis of Strategies and Technologies (CAST), a Moscow-based defense think tank, said the doctrine indicates Russia was preparing for prolonged confrontation with the West.

    “Its updated version [signifies] a long-term standoff with the U.S. and its NATO and major non-NATO allies,” he said.

    Atlantic Pivot

    Speaking aboard a new Russian navy frigate during Navy Day celebrations in the Baltic enclave of Kaliningrad, Rogozin said the decision to expand Russian naval activity in the Atlantic Ocean was a response to heightened tensions with NATO since the start of the Ukraine crisis.

    That crisis, which began after Russia annexed Crimea from Ukraine last year, led a revitalized NATO to relocate equipment and stage war games close to Russian borders.

    “We emphasize the Atlantic because NATO has been developing actively of late and coming closer to our borders, and Russia is of course responding to these developments,” Rogozin said, according to the Kremlin website.

    According to Shepovalenko, this change in emphasis abandons the balanced global posture held by the Russian navy in recent years in favor of a biased one that is “assertive in the West [Atlantic Ocean] and in the North, and cooperative in the East and the South,” he said. The updated doctrine has provisions for greater coordination with the Chinese and Indian navies, he added.

    To effectively project force into the Atlantic would require Russia to push ahead with the militarization of the Arctic, Rogozin said. Russian military planners see the Arctic as a key access point for Russia’s northern fleet to enter the Atlantic unimpeded by NATO.

    Russia’s Baltic and Black Sea forces are separated from the Atlantic by NATO countries and fleets. The ships of the Baltic Fleet, based in Kaliningrad, must pass by Germany and Denmark through the Kattegat Sea, while the Black Sea Fleet, based in Crimea, has to navigate the Turkish Bosphorus.

    This heightens the Arctic’s strategic importance, because control over it would give Russia’s Northern Fleet — the largest of all four major Russian fleets — “free and unhindered access to the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans,” Rogozin told Putin.

    Rogozin also said the naval doctrine was important to aid Moscow's economic aims in the Arctic, which has huge oil and gas reserves and is a potential future shipping route.

    Limited Assets


    While the new doctrine is ambitious, Russia may find it difficult to enact.

    Russian ships already have a presence in the Atlantic Ocean, and it is hard to imagine how their strength could be elevated. Ships like the Northern Fleet flagship — the Soviet-built Admiral Kuznetsov aircraft carrier — patrol the Atlantic accompanied by the handful of Russian naval vessels capable of blue water operations far from Russian shores, such as the Black Sea Fleet’s Moskva heavy cruiser. Not much more is available.

    Though an effective blue-water force during the Cold War, Russia’s naval inventory can no longer support long-range oceangoing operations and in recent years has mostly functioned as a coastal defense force.

    “Of Russia’s over 215 surface ships, only a quarter of them are capable of blue-water operations, while the remaining are primarily meant for littoral [close to home] operations,” Shepovalenko said.

    New ships such as large destroyers designed for oceangoing deployments are not yet under construction, and are not expected until the mid- to late-2020s.

    Russia’s navy is expecting almost 100 ships by 2020, but the majority of them are small vessels like frigates, corvettes and patrol boats.

    This means that Russia will struggle to fulfill its new doctrine until it begins building bigger ships, and no change in shipbuilding plans has been announced.

    “New missions require new ships, and no new ships equals no new missions,” Shepovalenko said.

    Black Sea Reversal


    The new doctrine also aims to reverse the decline of Russia’s Black Sea Fleet.

    Headquartered in the Crimean city of Sevastopol, the Black Sea Fleet was one of Russia’s most withered when Russia annexed Crimea in March 2014.

    A basing agreement with Kiev prevented Moscow from adding new ships to the force, but freed from that constraint the Defense Ministry last year deployed over 10 new ships to the Black Sea Fleet and is planning to use it as the foundation of a permanent Mediterranean flotilla, Rogozin said.

    Taken as a whole, the updated naval doctrine has a strong focus on reversing the navy’s gradual decline in the years since the fall of the Soviet Union, when lack of funds saw many ships tied up in port, rusting away for years, and Russia’s ability to pursue strategic objectives on the high sees eroded.

    To achieve this, the doctrine goes beyond naming areas of strategic interest for the Russian navy, and adds all-new sections on shipbuilding and social support for sailors.

    Rogozin said that Russia over the last 10-15 years has developed a domestic shipbuilding industry that “in terms of naval shipbuilding is doing work on a scale comparable to what was happening during the Soviet period.”

    According to Putin, the addition of shipbuilding provisions to Russian naval doctrine “is a big event for our future navy, and for developing our shipbuilding industry, because the main customer — the navy in this case, and the Defense Ministry — formulate their future needs, and the industry must carry out these tasks.”

    Putin also said that for the first time the doctrine includes provisions for improving the health care given to Russian sailors.

    “People need to know that from now on, our strategic documents for developing our country’s fleet and navy will address the social aspect too, and will give people what they expect from their service,” Putin said.

  5. #5
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    35,749

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by OUTLAW 09 View Post
    http://www.themoscowtimes.com/busine...to/526277.html

    New Russian Naval Doctrine Enshrines Confrontation With NATO

    By Matthew Bodner

    Jul. 27 2015 21:19
    During the height of the Cold War the Soviet Navy never was a "blue water fleet" and now it is still not regardless of the tones coming from Putin.

    NOT when they depend on gas turbine engines from the Ukraine that have been stopped.

  6. #6
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    35,749

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by OUTLAW 09 View Post
    http://www.themoscowtimes.com/busine...to/526277.html

    New Russian Naval Doctrine Enshrines Confrontation With NATO

    By Matthew Bodner

    Jul. 27 2015 21:19
    Putin fails to see he needs money for his militay visions---

    Russia is in trouble as Gazprom, producing 10% of GDP, collapsed by 19% last year
    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/e...al-crisis.html … pic.twitter.com/VmxJASyqp7

    Of Russia’s over 215 surface ships, only a quarter of them are capable of blue-water operations"

    Rogozin: To effectively project force into Atlantic, requires Russia to push ahead with militarization of Arctic
    http://www.themoscowtimes.com/busine...to/526277.html

  7. #7
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    35,749

    Default

    Visiting Kaliningrad Putin confirms the adoption of new naval doctrine w/ more assertiveness in Atlantic & Arctic

    http://goo.gl/5HQYn7

    Russia forgets it signed UNSCR 1612 prohibiting use of child soldiers pic.twitter.com/QXBnVXxyuP http://www.un.org/press/en/2005/sc8458.doc.htmhttps://twitter.com/JulianRoepcke/st...95886297792512

  8. #8
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    35,749

    Default

    http://www.cepa.org/content/militarization-black-sea

    The Militarization of the Black Sea
    Stephen Blank

    July 20, 2015

    By invading Ukraine and annexing Crimea, Russia shattered the belief that war in Europe was inconceivable. Consequently, the entire East European front from the Arctic to the Black Sea is now undergoing serious militarization. Although the invasion of Ukraine has understandably led NATO to concentrate on the Baltic States and Poland; NATO has not ignored the Black Sea and is sending forces to the Balkans and building bases there. Nevertheless, that has not allayed regional anxieties about Russian objectives and policies. And the reason for this anxiety is Russian policy.

    Upon capturing Crimea, Moscow immediately seized all of Ukraine’s energy assets and began an ongoing and steady program of large-scale militarization. Moscow has deployed Iskander missiles in Crimea to threaten both the Balkans and South Caucasus regions. Russia has launched a long-term program to build combined land, sea, air, and air defense forces, whose purposes are to create an anti-access and area denial force (A2AD) against NATO and to conduct power projection into the Balkans as well as the Middle East. At the same time Moscow has shadowed NATO warships whenever they enter the Black Sea and is clearly sending a message that it insists that the Black Sea remain a closed Russian lake except for contingencies where Moscow seeks to project power abroad into the Mediterranean. To achieve that latter goal Russia has sought army bases in Serbia and a naval base at Bar in Montenegro on the Adriatic, and in Cyprus.

    Concurrently, the war in Ukraine and Moscow’s recent veto of a UN resolution calling the Serbian massacre at Srebrenica in 1995 an act of genocide demonstrate that Moscow is still consistently playing the ethnic card throughout the Balkans and Black Sea area to prevent their stabilization as increasingly secure democratic zones. In this context, it is clear to see why the original objective of Putin’s campaign to create a New Russia (Novorossiya) entailed inciting ethnic uprisings and terrorism. By doing so, forces based in Crimea and the Donbass could seize those areas while forces based in Moldova marched the 80 kilometers to Odessa to seize that city and deprive Ukraine of its last port and the means of upholding its independence. And apart from inflaming pre-existing ethnic tensions or stoking new ones, Moscow has long utilized its connections with Russian and Balkan organized crime and key economic sectors like energy and the media to corrupt Balkan politicians, movements, and government institutions.

    Meanwhile, Moscow continues to attempt to subordinate Balkan states with its energy program on a daily basis. The Black Sea pipeline now called Turk Stream would traverse formerly Ukrainian waters and ship 63 billion cubic meters (BCM) annually to Turkey, 47 BCM of which would then enter a pipeline ending at the Greek-Turkish border so that Russia could elude European Union jurisdiction. Moscow’s recent deal to build the next stage of this pipeline, would give Greece billions in tax receipts after the pipeline opens in 2019 and ensure Russian ownership so that the EU cannot interfere, expresses Moscow’s ambitions to fracture EU unity and subordinate Balkan states through their dependence upon energy imports. Similarly, hints from the new BRICS Bank that Greece could get debt relief show that Moscow is employing every instrument of power, whether economic or military, that it possesses to regain its influence in the Balkan and Black Sea areas, intimidate local governments into surrendering to its agenda, and undermine European integration.

    Therefore, the EU and NATO cannot allow the Black Sea to become a closed Russian lake or let Russian threats, whether they occur in energy projects or in military force, go unanswered. Just as we need a coherent strategy for Ukraine we need an equally compelling multi-dimensional strategy for the Balkans. And as Greece shows, we need it now, not tomorrow or the day after.

  9. #9
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    35,749

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by OUTLAW 09 View Post
    http://www.themoscowtimes.com/busine...to/526277.html

    New Russian Naval Doctrine Enshrines Confrontation With NATO

    By Matthew Bodner

    Jul. 27 2015 21:19
    But first they have to pay for the new Navy-----

    Russia's ruble is tanking today..
    Over 60 to a US$
    And almost 95 to GBP
    pic.twitter.com/UfIGogBaGs

    AND the price of Brent oil is tanking as well----

  10. #10
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    35,749

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by OUTLAW 09 View Post
    http://www.themoscowtimes.com/busine...to/526277.html

    New Russian Naval Doctrine Enshrines Confrontation With NATO

    By Matthew Bodner

    Jul. 27 2015 21:19
    After boosting Russia defense spending, announcing many new missiles, Putin blames it all on US withdrawal from ABM Treaty... which Bush administration announced in 2001. Putin did not object then. Now seems to resurrect issue as an excuse. Hardly plausible.

    Notice Russian says nothing about their blatant violation of the INF and the threatened withdrawing from the INF over being accussed of their violation.

  11. #11
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    35,749

    Default

    BREAKING: RAF Typhoons scrambled to intercept Russian "Blackjack" Tu-160 Bombers heading towards British airspace
    http://forces.tv/37486149

    RAF Waddington Info @EGXWinfo
    All information on the current QRA targeting Russian bears on @EGXCinfo & article being updated Live at
    http://www.egxwinfogroup.co.uk/?p=243

    Humor is seen in this........
    The @RoyalAirForce intercepted Russians without borders.

    pic.twitter.com/Knl4Ot74wV
    Last edited by davidbfpo; 02-18-2016 at 11:42 AM. Reason: Copied to main thread on this theme

  12. #12
    Council Member davidbfpo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    13,366

    Default Don't panic

    Cited in part:
    Quote Originally Posted by OUTLAW 09 View Post
    BREAKING: RAF Typhoons scrambled to intercept Russian "Blackjack" Tu-160 Bombers heading towards British airspace http://forces.tv/37486149

    RAF Waddington Info @EGXWinfo
    All information on the current QRA targeting Russian bears on @EGXCinfo & article being updated Live at
    http://www.egxwinfogroup.co.uk/?p=243
    These flights are a regular event, they have never publicly entered actual UK air space (which is 12 miles from the land). They do enter the UK Air Defence Identification Zone (ADIZ), which extends much further than actual UK air space and officialdom states an intercept is needed to ensure the safety of other aircraft - Russian planes do not fly with a transponder turned on.

    Not that UK / US / NATO aircraft ever fly on similar missions towards Russia.
    Last edited by davidbfpo; 02-18-2016 at 11:42 AM. Reason: copied to main thread on this
    davidbfpo

  13. #13
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    35,749

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by davidbfpo View Post
    Cited in part:

    These flights are a regular event, they have never publicly entered actual UK air space (which is 12 miles from the land). They do enter the UK Air Defence Identification Zone (ADIZ), which extends much further than actual UK air space and officialdom states an intercept is needed to ensure the safety of other aircraft - Russian planes do not fly with a transponder turned on.

    Not that UK / US / NATO aircraft ever fly on similar missions towards Russia.
    What is interesting is again they flew with transponders off and the UK was pre-warned by NATO Baltic Air Defense units...UK did not notice it on their own until shortly prior to entering UK ADIZ as the UK scramble made it after they had crossed into the ADIZ not prior to it.

    Actually social media picked up on their air traffic even before the NATO Baltic Air patrols announced it.
    Last edited by davidbfpo; 02-18-2016 at 11:43 AM. Reason: Copied to main thread on this

  14. #14
    Council Member AdamG's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Hiding from the Dreaded Burrito Gang
    Posts
    3,096

    Default

    Russian corvettes equipped with Kalibr cruise missile capable of penetrating complex air defenses and hitting targets at a supersonic speed at a distance of some 2,000km will be permanently deployed in the Mediterranean, a Russian Navy admiral said.
    https://www.rt.com/news/333057-kalib...mediterranean/
    A scrimmage in a Border Station
    A canter down some dark defile
    Two thousand pounds of education
    Drops to a ten-rupee jezail


    http://i.imgur.com/IPT1uLH.jpg

  15. #15
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    35,749

    Default

    #Russian submarine activity around #GIUK GAP a growing concern for @NATO forces
    http://www.military.com/daily-news/2...nt-russia.html
    pic.twitter.com/2ruWBbESkd

    (Earlier today in separate post) Report confirmed of new sighting of periscope from non-Swedish submarine in outer Stockholm archipelago last year. http://mobil.dn.se/nyheter/sverige/o...es-vid-ovning/
    Last edited by davidbfpo; 02-27-2016 at 11:48 PM. Reason: Add 2nd para & link.

  16. #16
    Council Member AdamG's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Hiding from the Dreaded Burrito Gang
    Posts
    3,096

    Default

    One year old alibi - have a flashback to the 1980s.

    Russia has deployed a fleet of spy trawlers off the British coast to intercept military communications, one of Britain’s most senior retired commanders said yesterday.

    Lord West of Spithead said Russian espionage had soared to a ‘worrying’ level as president Vladimir Putin ordered more acts of ‘provocation’.

    Equipped with hi-tech surveillance, the converted fishing boats have been seen in the international waters of the North Sea by Nato aircraft.

    Lord West, a former First Sea Lord, said the Cold War tactic was designed to gain intelligence on Britain’s nuclear missiles and warships.

    He said: ‘It was quite a tense business during the Cold War and now it is winding up again and it is very worrying. They seem to have... increased espionage, which raises tension.’
    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...commander.html
    A scrimmage in a Border Station
    A canter down some dark defile
    Two thousand pounds of education
    Drops to a ten-rupee jezail


    http://i.imgur.com/IPT1uLH.jpg

  17. #17
    Council Member davidbfpo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    13,366

    Default

    AdamG,

    Not that the West, via NATO, conduct such eavesdropping missions off Russian territory. It is rare to see any reporting on that. I can recall a USAF RC-135 Rivet (ELINT) plane being "chased" into Swedish airspace in 2015 IIRC and the Norwegians have a vessel full-time deployed in the Barents Sea (there are posts on both on the Forum).
    davidbfpo

  18. #18
    Council Member AdamG's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Hiding from the Dreaded Burrito Gang
    Posts
    3,096

    Default

    Russian attack planes buzzed the guided missile destroyer USS Donald Cook during joint exercises in the Baltic Sea this week in what defense officials on Wednesday described as "aggressive" and "unsafe flight maneuvers."

    Two Russian SU-24 jets made "numerous, close-range and low-altitude passes" on the U.S. ship Tuesday as a helicopter was refueling on the deck, according to a statement from U.S. European Command.

    The Cook, which was holding a joint exercise with Poland, a NATO ally, "encountered multiple, aggressive flight maneuvers by Russian aircraft that were performed within close proximity of the ship," the statement said.
    http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2...oyer/82977844/
    A scrimmage in a Border Station
    A canter down some dark defile
    Two thousand pounds of education
    Drops to a ten-rupee jezail


    http://i.imgur.com/IPT1uLH.jpg

  19. #19
    Council Member AdamG's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Hiding from the Dreaded Burrito Gang
    Posts
    3,096

    Default

    Alibi Fires.

    The Russian Navy will receive six advanced Project 22160 patrol ships equipped with an integrated bridge system by 2019, the Kronstadt Technologies company's military-technical head said Monday.

    MOSCOW (Sputnik) – The Project 22160 ships are intended for patrolling, search-and-rescue operations, anti-piracy and anti-smuggling activities, environmental monitoring, as well as coastal defense and escort service. They have a range of 6,000 nautical miles and are armed with a single 57mm cannon, heavy machine guns, air defense system and missile launchers.
    Read more: http://sputniknews.com/military/2016...#ixzz45jsoHicW


    The Russian navy is in the middle of an ambitious shipbuilding program that includes a new guided-missile corvette and two new classes of guided-missile frigates. It has already stationed the first two of a planned six new ultra-quiet diesel Kilo-class submarines in the Black Sea, one of which fired land-attack cruise missiles at Syrian rebel targets from the Eastern Mediterranean last year.
    *

    A 2015 Office of Naval Intelligence report said the emphasis on missiles in Russia’s new shipbuilding — in particular the Kalibr cruise missile being installed on all new submarines, corvettes, frigates and larger surface ships — is altering security in the region.
    http://www.stripes.com/news/russian-...enses-1.403477


    MOSCOW, March 25. /TASS/. Russia this year will deploy coastal missile systems and drones of a new generation in the Kuril islands, Russian Defense Minister Sergey Shoigu said on Friday.

    "Military units in the Kuril islands are being rearmed in keeping with the original schedule. This year coastal missile systems Bal and Bastion and new generation drones Eleron-3 will be deployed there," Shoigu told the Defense Ministry’s board meeting.
    Earlier, Shoigu announced that the Defense Ministry planned to put the finishing touches to military infrastructures in the Kuril islands later this year. Last year air defense units armed with short range air defense systems Tor-M2U went operational in in the Kurils.
    http://www.stripes.com/news/russian-...enses-1.403477

    Perfidious Madrid?

    Eleven members of the European Parliament have complained to the EU’s foreign policy chief, Federica Mogherini, about the Russian navy’s frequent use of the Spanish north African enclave of Ceuta.Russian warships and submarines regularly stop in Ceuta for fuel, prompting concern that Spain may have breached EU sanctions against Russia over the conflict in Ukraine.
    *
    Since 2011, over 50 Russian warships have stopped in Ceuta, one of two Spanish cities located on the African mainland, to resupply and give their crews a rest. The vessels have included submarines, frigates, destroyers, amphibious assault ships and auxiliary vessels.
    http://chronicle.gi/2016/03/meps-put...tiny-in-ceuta/
    Last edited by AdamG; 04-13-2016 at 08:12 PM.
    A scrimmage in a Border Station
    A canter down some dark defile
    Two thousand pounds of education
    Drops to a ten-rupee jezail


    http://i.imgur.com/IPT1uLH.jpg

  20. #20
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    35,749

    Default

    Russia jets make 'simulated attack' passes near U.S. destroyer: U.S.
    http://reut.rs/22ulOB7

    U.S. Def.official: Russian fighter jets flew very closely over USS Donald Cook in international waters in Baltic Sea

    Russian SU-24 jets were not armed but flew so close to U.S. destroyer they created a 'wake in the water'
    http://liveuamap.com/en/2016/13-apri...-flew-so-close

    Last edited by davidbfpo; 04-13-2016 at 09:13 PM.

Similar Threads

  1. South China Sea and China (2011-2017)
    By Ray in forum Asia-Pacific
    Replies: 769
    Last Post: 11-13-2017, 01:31 PM
  2. Air Force Motorized Jaeger Regiment?
    By Distiller in forum Trigger Puller
    Replies: 57
    Last Post: 06-25-2010, 12:14 PM
  3. Understanding Airmen
    By LawVol in forum Military - Other
    Replies: 93
    Last Post: 12-12-2007, 06:26 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •