Results 1 to 13 of 13

Thread: Religious Extremism in Syria:A New Launching Pad for Global Terrorism

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Council Member davidbfpo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    13,170

    Default Religious Extremism in Syria:A New Launching Pad for Global Terrorism

    This is a conference @ Vienna 2nd May 2014, rather late to get a place I guess, but advertised today by the e-journal 'Perspectives on Terrorism', so there must be places.

    Added here as the agenda may identify new sources for those who watch Syria:http://www.terrorismanalysts.com/pt/...yria_2_May.pdf
    davidbfpo

  2. #2
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Durban, South Africa
    Posts
    3,902

    Default

    David, this can't be true.

    Years ago then the Syria 'problem' first started we were assured by a bunch of smart guys here at SWC that Syria was merely a sideshow with no potential for regional or global 'overspill'.

    Were they wrong? Are they prepared to admit it?


    Quote Originally Posted by davidbfpo View Post
    This is a conference @ Vienna 2nd May 2014, rather late to get a place I guess, but advertised today by the e-journal 'Perspectives on Terrorism', so there must be places.

    Added here as the agenda may identify new sources for those who watch Syria:http://www.terrorismanalysts.com/pt/...yria_2_May.pdf

  3. #3
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    589

    Default Quite possibly an Indiana Jones sequel in here somewhere...


  4. #4
    Council Member Dayuhan's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Latitude 17° 5' 11N, Longitude 120° 54' 24E, altitude 1499m. Right where I want to be.
    Posts
    3,137

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JMA View Post
    David, this can't be true.

    Years ago then the Syria 'problem' first started we were assured by a bunch of smart guys here at SWC that Syria was merely a sideshow with no potential for regional or global 'overspill'.

    Were they wrong? Are they prepared to admit it?
    Who said that, and where? Feel free to cite specific posts.

    I re-read much of the old Syria thread the other day. It's at times entertaining and at times excruciating, but I didn't see anybody saying anything even remotely resembling a claim that it was "merely a sideshow with no potential for regional or global 'overspill". A number of people pointed out that US intervention was unlikely to prevent "overspill" and could very easily provoke or accelerate it, but that's a quite different thing.
    “The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed (and hence clamorous to be led to safety) by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary”

    H.L. Mencken

  5. #5
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Durban, South Africa
    Posts
    3,902

    Default

    Oh, I don't expect any admission from those who continue to get it so badly wrong (on Syria and just about everywhere).

    The US cultural diesease of refusing to take responsibility for one actions is clearly alive and well and has sadly spread and infected the Brits in a big way (see their shrill denials over their abysmal Iraq and Afghanistan performance).

    You can sleep well with the comfort that nobody could consistently get it wrong as the US WH over the recent past. You are in 'good' company.


    Quote Originally Posted by Dayuhan View Post
    Who said that, and where? Feel free to cite specific posts.

    I re-read much of the old Syria thread the other day. It's at times entertaining and at times excruciating, but I didn't see anybody saying anything even remotely resembling a claim that it was "merely a sideshow with no potential for regional or global 'overspill". A number of people pointed out that US intervention was unlikely to prevent "overspill" and could very easily provoke or accelerate it, but that's a quite different thing.

  6. #6
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    589

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JMA View Post
    Oh, I don't expect any admission from those who continue to get it so badly wrong (on Syria and just about everywhere).

    The US cultural diesease of refusing to take responsibility for one actions is clearly alive and well and has sadly spread and infected the Brits in a big way (see their shrill denials over their abysmal Iraq and Afghanistan performance).

    You can sleep well with the comfort that nobody could consistently get it wrong as the US WH over the recent past. You are in 'good' company.
    If I were you I would switch to decaff ... or camomile tea.

  7. #7
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Durban, South Africa
    Posts
    3,902

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tukhachevskii View Post
    If I were you I would switch to decaff ... or camomile tea.
    Another response after a nerve touched?

  8. #8
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    97

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tukhachevskii View Post
    If I were you I would switch to decaff ... or camomile tea.

    Well Said!

  9. #9
    Council Member Dayuhan's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Latitude 17° 5' 11N, Longitude 120° 54' 24E, altitude 1499m. Right where I want to be.
    Posts
    3,137

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JMA View Post
    Oh, I don't expect any admission from those who continue to get it so badly wrong (on Syria and just about everywhere).

    The US cultural diesease of refusing to take responsibility for one actions is clearly alive and well and has sadly spread and infected the Brits in a big way (see their shrill denials over their abysmal Iraq and Afghanistan performance).

    You can sleep well with the comfort that nobody could consistently get it wrong as the US WH over the recent past. You are in 'good' company.
    Accusing anyone of "getting it wrong" doesn't hold much water unless you can say what you think "getting it right" would have been.

    The US has, like most nations, never been overly fond of taking responsibility for its actions, but I can't see how one could reasonably argue that the Syrian Civil War is a consequence of US or British action.

    I have my share of criticism of the US approach to Syria, most notably involving the excruciating "red line" comments, but at least they have gotten one thing right: US involvement remains peripheral and limited. There is no faction that could realistically be described as a US proxy, and US forces are not engaged. That at least is something: it was always going to be a mess, but at least we haven't made it a worse mess, or made it our mess.

    What do you think should have been done, and what do you think the outcome of that action would have been?
    “The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed (and hence clamorous to be led to safety) by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary”

    H.L. Mencken

  10. #10
    Council Member
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Calcutta, India
    Posts
    1,124

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dayuhan View Post
    Accusing anyone of "getting it wrong" doesn't hold much water unless you can say what you think "getting it right" would have been.

    The US has, like most nations, never been overly fond of taking responsibility for its actions, but I can't see how one could reasonably argue that the Syrian Civil War is a consequence of US or British action.
    Am I to understand it was self combustion?

    Yes, I can say what is 'getting it right'.

    Let nations be as they are and what they think is right and not impost on them as to what you think is right.

    Understand the social and religious compulsions of the Islamic nations.

    Let them stew in their own juice and not tell them to have the American apple pie!

    No Islamic nation has been a problem until they were told 'what is right'!

    What is sauce for the goose is not necessarily sauce for the gander.
    Last edited by Ray; 06-12-2014 at 12:32 PM.

Similar Threads

  1. Is one man's terrorist really another man's freedom fighter?
    By McArthur in forum Adversary / Threat
    Replies: 36
    Last Post: 11-09-2012, 09:40 PM
  2. Sunni and Shi'a Terrorism: Differences That Matter
    By Jedburgh in forum Adversary / Threat
    Replies: 25
    Last Post: 02-21-2009, 08:44 PM
  3. Muslim religious leaders speaking out against terrorism
    By skiguy in forum RFIs & Members' Projects
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 09-16-2007, 04:11 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •