Results 1 to 20 of 80

Thread: Russian political psyche: history and modernity

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    1,007

    Default

    Interview with Russian Security Council head Patrushev. Putin's close friend from Leningrad times and former FSB director. In the original article in Russian words USA and American were used over 50 times.

    http://rt.com/politics/196456-russia...rushev-global/
    Last edited by kaur; 10-19-2014 at 10:28 AM.

  2. #2
    Council Member mirhond's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    372

    Default

    http://news.mail.ru/video/229498/

    A man got prison term for an anecdote. looks like "old good" Soviet tradition returns. An anecdote is defined as hate speech, while it's just an ancient deja moo (but somewhat funny)
    The whole situation is still the stuff of a joke, but...

    http://www.kommersant.ru/doc/2614961
    Putin defined "antinational thinking" - call for owerthowing an existent regime falls into scale.
    Last edited by davidbfpo; 11-20-2014 at 11:33 PM. Reason: Edited due to language. PM to author
    Haeresis est maxima opera maleficarum non credere.

  3. #3
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    1,007

    Default

    mirhond, back to golden era habits?

  4. #4
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    1,007

    Default

    Beyond Putin? Nationalism and Xenophobia in Russian Public Opinion

    Published 11-25-2014

    (The Washington Quarterly) The role of nationalism within the Russian public is an under- examined but potentially important aspect of the crisis surrounding Russia’s annexation of Crimea and its continuing involvement in eastern and southern regions of Ukraine. As commentators have sought to comprehend President Vladimir Putin’s motives, many have asserted or assumed that such actions enjoy tremendous Russian public support. Indeed, public opinion polls from Russia indicate that Putin’s popularity soared in the wake of the Crimean annexation and that large majorities have supported the government’s policies in Ukraine, sympathizing with the Kremlin’s negative portrayals of U.S. motives and actions.1 However, it is not clear whether this wave of public support is a fleeting “rally around the flag” phenomenon or the result of an organic, deeper tendency toward nationalism and xenophobia in the Russian public

    http://twq.elliott.gwu.edu/beyond-pu...public-opinion

  5. #5
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    1,007

    Default

    In Ukraine topic I did mention DPR unit called СССР/Soviet Union. The leader explained the name with desire to stability that existed during SU time. Today Russian business daily published 1 poll about nostalgia to SU. 13% want this.

    Надежд на Евразийский союз тоже мало: постоянно идут торговые войны с Белоруссией, поэтому все тенденции очень разнонаправленные и «у людей в голове каша», поясняет Бызов: «Те 13%, которые хотят обратно в СССР, — это сложившиеся и выросшие там люди. Сейчас уже выросло несколько поколений, для которых Советский Союз — просто романтический образ, и они считают возврат туда нереальным».
    http://www.vedomosti.ru/politics/new...dnej-tyazhesti

  6. #6
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    1,007

    Default

    mirhond's golden age in pictures.

    http://visualhistory.livejournal.com/902413.html

  7. #7
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    35,749

    Default

    Seems even Putin has a hard time with history?


    Bloomberg News

    Putin’s Crimea-as-Jerusalem Myth Baffles Russian Historians

    By Ilya Arkhipov and Stepan Kravchenko December 05, 2014

    President Vladimir Putin’s elevation of Crimea to the status of Russia’s Holy Land has prompted puzzlement and scorn from historians and commentators.

    Crimea for Russians is “like the Temple Mount in Jerusalem” for Muslims and Jews, Putin said, and would be regarded this way “from now on and forever.” Vladimir the Great was baptized in Chersonesus, Crimea, an event in 988 that’s considered to be the beginning of the Christianization of Kievan Rus, a precursor state to Russia and Ukraine, Putin explained in his annual address yesterday to parliament and top officials in Moscow.

    “Prince Vladimir was Kievan, not Muscovite, and this probably only underlines the right of Kiev and not Moscow to Crimea,” Andrei Zubov, a Russian historian and political scientist, said in an interview.

    Putin’s new Crimea myth added a religious aspect to Russia’s confrontation with the U.S. and the European Union after it annexed the peninsula from Ukraine in March. EU and U.S. sanctions have helped to push the Russian economy to the brink of recession as it wrestles with a 39 percent slump in the value of the ruble against the dollar this year and a one-third decline in the oil price. Russia depends on oil and gas revenue for about half of its federal budget.

    Historians argue over whether Vladimir was baptized in Vasilev, near Kiev, rather than Chersonesus, said Zubov, who lost his post at the Moscow State Institute of International Relations in March after he compared Putin’s takeover of Crimea to Nazi leader Adolf Hitler’s annexation of Austria in 1938.

    ‘Incorrect’ Comparison

    From a religious viewpoint, “Kiev is a much more important place for Russian Orthodox pilgrims than Crimea,” said Deacon Andrei Kuraev, a theologian and blogger. It’s “incorrect” to compare Crimea with the Temple Mount, the holiest place on Earth for Jews, he said.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •