Great finally AP seems to be getting the concept--even based on your statements that negotiations are the only way forward---would appreciate just what you assume there will be negotiations over? What Yalta, the beaches of the Crimea or those world famous Crimea vineyards or those new casino's Putin wants built.
The last time I checked they are still negotiating on the border to NK are they not, let's see they are still negotiating in Baghdad, still negotiating with Iran, still negotiating on Syria, on issues in Lebanon, between the Israeli's and the Palestinians and the list goes on and on. The last time I checked even the negotiations over the South Sudan what were a raving success?
Oh then let's check the negotiations with Russia over the Georgian and Moldavian separatists? Wow we seem to have a great track record with successes with Russia when we see them negotiating-right AP?- -even the INF they signed has been violated or the current Ukrainian Memorandum they actually did sign and what followed it to the letter---right AP?
Can you tell us here at SWJ just where negotiations finally settled a major world crisis?
Again directed question to you----just what is to be negotiated over the Ukraine?---what Russia is to be allowed to be a member of the Ukrainian parliament or maybe Ukrainians will get what free visa visitation rights in the summer to visit Crimea beaches? Or maybe we can negotiate over the shipment of Crimea Sekt to the US or maybe we can negotiate to allow KBR to built a new bridge from Russia to the Crimea.
The concept of negotiations are something that seems to be at least since 2001 failures or can you see a better track record?
Again AP where have they succeeded?
Bookmarks