Ukraine: military (Aug '14 to mid-June '15) closed

[OUTLAW 09]

AP---you do realize that the looted factory equipment can from a Ukrainian factory that produces a world class SIGINT line of equipment that the Russian Army needed in order to reach their 2020 military reforms program.

But hey I guess the Putin "wanted payments" for the delivered "humanitarian aid".

And again I state what is the US response and what is the US strategy for central Europe and the Baltics outside of just being verbal?

@RobPulseNews there were reports about disassembling "TOPAZ" that produced Kolchuga SIGINT complex @enigmaleggend @raging545

[OUTLAW 09]

AP--another point to think about--go back and reread all the Russian statements made in the UNSC, statements made by the Russian FM and statements made by Putin himself--- when they voted down "humanitarian aid" for Syria---was meddling in Syrian internal affairs, trying to influence Syria, to used to create a reason to toss out Assad, to used use as a reason to use force against Assad--to even supporting terrorists with the aid.

Now just how is it then possible that Russia states the following today via RIA:

Russia Says Aid Delivery to East Ukraine Legal, Guided by Humanitarian Principles

Russia said Saturday its humanitarian assistance mission to turbulent eastern Ukraine had complied with the International Court of Justice ruling that allowed for the delivery of humanitarian aid to people disregarding their political convictions.

By the way it is the same IJC that ruled against Russia to the tune of 50B USD in the Yukos case ---and then the Russian Duma stated they should not obey and leave the IJC, to virtually the same remarks by the Russian FM and also from Putin.

So Russian argues one way when they want to and another way when they want to so just how does one then "negotiate" with a country that virtually lies with every statement when it suits them?

How does then the West "trust" a country when it speaks with three tongues?