Page 42 of 106 FirstFirst ... 3240414243445292 ... LastLast
Results 821 to 840 of 2107

Thread: The Trump impact on US policy

  1. #821
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    35,749

    Default

    Brennan: he briefed Gang of 8--including McConnell/Ryan--in Aug/Sept. that Russia intervening to help Trump. What did McConnell and Ryan do?

  2. #822
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    35,749

    Default

    White House says no evidence of Trump team collusion with Russians
    http://reut.rs/2ryivBl

    THIS is not what the former Director of the CIA publicly stated in a House hearing yesterday.....

  3. #823
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    35,749

    Default

    Appears Trump has Russian connections where ever he turns....and there is no conflict of interest here??
    Attached Images Attached Images

  4. #824
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    3,169

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by OUTLAW 09 View Post
    White House says no evidence of Trump team collusion with Russians
    http://reut.rs/2ryivBl

    THIS is not what the former Director of the CIA publicly stated in a House hearing yesterday.....
    Um? I just listen to the former director testify and that is exactly what he said. Are you now, or perhaps have been, posting disinformation, or should I call it fake news?

    He said members of the team met with Russian officials, but he could not prove they were colluding. Furthermore, though underreported, they met a number of other foreign officials. That only makes sense if you plan on being President, as long as you don't interfere with the siting President's role. Reagan's team met with Iranian officials before Reagan became President. Where was the rage then? Maybe there was no reason to rage, because this is considered a wise thing to do? Oddly enough, senior lawyers who don't care for the President are wondering what the hoopla is about, because at the end of the day even if members did met with Russia officials that in on way violates any laws. There is no case, and no justification for impeachment. Just mindless rant at this point.

    Throwing this back at you, the Russians are experts at information warfare. You told so a thousand times. One of their objectives is to weaken countries by causing deep political divides in countries of interest, which in turn makes them less of threat to Russia. I doubt they liked Clinton or Trump, but they supported the loser to deepen the political divide in our country. Now that Trump is President they're working with the far left, who you clearly support now, and leveraging them through agents of influence to tear our country apart by focusing on complete nonsense. I wonder if the Russian bots you warn us about are posting the twitter twits you continue to post at a pace no one can keep up with. Recent studies indicate if you post a lie repeatedly, people will start believing it. Are you sure you are not unwittingly supporting Russia now? How can you be sure? Isn't the purpose of Russia disinformation to create doubt? Clearly we have plenty of that in our country now, but I'm keeping faith. This to will pass someday.
    Last edited by Bill Moore; 05-24-2017 at 05:12 AM.

  5. #825
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    35,749

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bill Moore View Post
    Um? I just listen to the former director testify and that is exactly what he said. Are you now, or perhaps have been, posting disinformation, or should I call it fake news?

    He said members of the team met with Russian officials, but he could not prove they were colluding. Furthermore, though underreported, they met a number of other foreign officials. That only makes sense if you plan on being President, as long as you don't interfere with the siting President's role. Reagan's team met with Iranian officials before Reagan became President. Where was the rage then? Maybe there was no reason to rage, because this is considered a wise thing to do? Oddly enough, senior lawyers who don't care for the President are wondering what the hoopla is about, because at the end of the day even if members did met with Russia officials that in on way violates any laws. There is no case, and no justification for impeachment. Just mindless rant at this point.

    Throwing this back at you, the Russians are experts at information warfare. You told so a thousand times. One of their objectives is to weaken countries by causing deep political divides in countries of interest, which in turn makes them less of threat to Russia. I doubt they liked Clinton or Trump, but they supported the loser to deepen the political divide in our country. Now that Trump is President they're working with the far left, who you clearly support now, and leveraging them through agents of influence to tear our country apart by focusing on complete nonsense. I wonder if the Russian bots you warn us about are posting the twitter twits you continue to post at a pace no one can keep up with. Recent studies indicate if you post a lie repeatedly, people will start believing it. Are you sure you are not unwittingly supporting Russia now? How can you be sure? Isn't the purpose of Russia disinformation to create doubt? Clearly we have plenty of that in our country now, but I'm keeping faith. This to will pass someday.
    Bill...but then check this out and then truly tell me what Brennan actually said....

    Trey Gowdy, senior GOP member of House Intel, downplayed Brennan's testimony, telling me it's not unusual for Russians to contact campaigns


    NOW here goes the following....FIVE major players of Obama and the Bush admins are now on record as stating they were never contacted by a single Russian official either during the campaign nor during transition......FACT not fake news...

    The Obama Ambassador to Syria Ford who also spoke with Putin during the transition phase for Obama ALSO has gone on record as stating the following.....

    "I only spoke to Putin in general terms and only what had been cleared by Obama before I went to Moscow and then I briefed Obama directly upon my return.".....FACT not fake news

    @matthewjdowd
    Never happened to me in 2000 or 2004, never happened to Begala in 1992 and 1996, never happened to Schmidt in 2004 and 2008.

    Jonathan Prince‏#@jonathanmprince
    Hell, they never even reached out to me when I was running Edwards - and I even *speak* a little Russian. (очень плохо)

    SO exactly "what altered state of reality" was this Republican House member talking about???????

    SO what do we know of the Flynn conversations during the campaign and AFTER....nothing and he even lied about those conversations and the number of conversations...

    HECK at first he lied that there were even conversations....

    You know as well as I do the depth of Brennans CI experience...

    Reread exactly what Brennan stated......

    BTW get off the "you are a lefty" thing since I have far more experience in the area of CI and active offensive CI operations against Russians than many that post here....IMHO you can be a liberal in a conservative world and vice versa if truth and honesty rule....because if you think about it most Americans are simply middle of the roaders....

    BTW I have probably killed more "Communists" than most commenters here in my life and have chased both RAF and Red Brigades and verbally duelled with true "ultra leftists and anarchists" on a daily basis in the Freie University setting and had as my MA professors both a US Communist Party card carrying member and a true Socialist both from Boston University so when a political term is thrown around I truly do understand what it means....

    BTW both of these Professors stated...."defend your political beliefs but be sure to defend them accurately....and with facts not emotion"....

    BTW try being a returning SF VN vet studying International Relations in a German university in 1971..you learn quickly to "verbally defend your own personal political beliefs in hours of student debates over a cup of coffee....

    I go on exactly what the ground reality is showing you and myself and if the "world of realty is sometimes harsh so be it"....

    BUT right now there is far more ongoing that both social media and yes even MSM are holding back and not reporting on as they feel the general public would not believe it even possible......

    BTW I have a massive foundation in HUMINT both collection and reporting and I have learned that between HUMINT and OSINT 80% of all intel is achieved this way...

    What I post usually has been first reported by social media and actually lately even backed up by MSM "breaking news"......

    I learned a long time ago that out of most HUMINT reporting there is usually a grain or two of "truth" and you as the collector must learn to "see and understand" that grain or two....

    REMEMBER just what Comey stated publicly in a House hearing...."when people realize what is ongoing and there is a true version they will be shocked on how their information was wrong".........
    Last edited by OUTLAW 09; 05-24-2017 at 09:05 AM.

  6. #826
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    35,749

    Default

    Bill...if I remember correctly I was warning about Trump long before the election and during the transition....

  7. #827
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    3,169

    Default

    The lefty thing simply refers to the bias lens you tend to view the President with. There is no balance, no critical thinking, just a strong belief the President is guilty of something, followed by cherry picking SM to support this belief. Frankly in today's political climate it is the left doing this. Last administration it was the right doing it with their outlandish claims about Obama. Our nation is suffering from a deficit of character and reason.

    We have biased media on the left and the right that deepens our political divides based on unprofessional reporting. Perhaps 24 hour news was the downfall of professional news, which combined with capitalist competition for market share has resulted in the fourth estate becoming as unreliable as social media. Add the failure of our universities to produce critical thinkers, and the increasing difficultly of sorting through the half truths in the age of spin we have become a democracy in name only now.
    Last edited by Bill Moore; 05-24-2017 at 09:35 AM.

  8. #828
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    35,749

    Default

    Christie warned Trump about Flynn.....

    Chris Christie: "if I were president-elect of the US, I wouldn't let Flynn into the WH, let alone give him a job."

    http://edition.cnn.com/2017/05/22/po...ynn/index.html

  9. #829
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    35,749

    Default

    Bill..goes to the heart of what you were posting......

    Former CIA Director John Brennan told Congress that U.S. intelligence found contact between Russian officials and people involved with Donald Trump's campaign at a time in 2016 when the Russians were "brazenly" interfering in the presidential election.

    "I encountered and am aware of information and intelligence that revealed contacts and interactions between Russian officials and U.S. persons involved in the Trump campaign that I was concerned about because of known Russian efforts to suborn such individuals," Brennan said Tuesday at an open session of the House Intelligence Committee.

    "And it raised questions in my mind again whether or not the Russians were able to gain the cooperation of those individuals."
    In "spywars speak" the term used by a CI investigator of "suborn" means an attempted Russian recruitment approach.....

    In "spywars speak" the sentence used by a CI investigator of "the Russians were able to gain cooperation of those individuals"....MEANS in very really CLEAR and CONCISE words..."was that person recruited and now working for RIS"....either as an active agent and or agent of influence...??

    NOW we can debate all day long about the word "collusion" but that is trumped by the words "suborn and gained cooperation"....

    AND that is exactly what Brennan publicly stated...

    BTW just a side note...due to my being former SF...having been in Det A, having a student in the Freie University, speaking fluent German and a good working Polish, having worked at JAROC B and 766thMID, having been in the only Army Intel Reserve unit in Berlin ALL got me on the GDR MfS Stasi and KGB\GRU radar and they tracked and or monitored me for over 18 years until I was approached by Stasi for the KGB\GRU....which resulted in an immediate call to INSCOM......I know where my loyalty lies...some in the Trump WH and Trump himself apparently do not....

    You should check my passport from that period....it literally glows under ultraviolent light....

    I do know what a KGB\MfS\GRU recruitment approach is and can see it coming a mile off...just as Brennan saw it coming and was trying to ascertain the depth of the Russian operation which was from what is being reported they did not initially and correctly put the dots together...cyber, information ops, and direct recruitment as a agent of influence....overall what is called in Russian "active measures"....

    That is why he actually sidestepped answering directly was it collusion..OR colluding??

    BTW do not think for a single minute Trump has not been on the USG IC radar...starting in 1986.....and for that fact even monitored by several European intel agencies...
    Last edited by OUTLAW 09; 05-24-2017 at 09:36 AM.

  10. #830
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    3,169

    Default

    If true the process will expose this. Most Americans had little faith in either Trump or Clinton when it comes to trustworthiness, but we still need to wait on the facts. Seeing a Russian recruiting pattern at play is intuition not necessarily fact. Intuition has its role to play, but it needs to be confirmed or disproved with facts.

  11. #831
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    35,749

    Default

    A lot of what we are seeing being "discovered" about Trump and his businesses conflicts...his finances and his 7 bankruptcies ...his Russian connections...and the same for his advisors was all out there before the election...US MSM simply did not cover it.....in fact the "Steele Dossier" was held up for months by US MSM......

    The mess we have now is largely a mess of the US MSM.......
    Attached Images Attached Images

  12. #832
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    35,749

    Default

    US social media companies must take full and complete responsibility of their failure to control their media in the face of massive Russian info warfare using their own media against Americans......

    Facebook to counter Kremlin-style info interventions in election#campaigns
    http://euromaidanpress.com/2017/05/2...on-campaigns/#

  13. #833
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    35,749

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bill Moore View Post
    Um? I just listen to the former director testify and that is exactly what he said. Are you now, or perhaps have been, posting disinformation, or should I call it fake news?

    He said members of the team met with Russian officials, but he could not prove they were colluding. Furthermore, though underreported, they met a number of other foreign officials. That only makes sense if you plan on being President, as long as you don't interfere with the siting President's role. Reagan's team met with Iranian officials before Reagan became President. Where was the rage then? Maybe there was no reason to rage, because this is considered a wise thing to do? Oddly enough, senior lawyers who don't care for the President are wondering what the hoopla is about, because at the end of the day even if members did met with Russia officials that in on way violates any laws. There is no case, and no justification for impeachment. Just mindless rant at this point.

    Throwing this back at you, the Russians are experts at information warfare. You told so a thousand times. One of their objectives is to weaken countries by causing deep political divides in countries of interest, which in turn makes them less of threat to Russia. I doubt they liked Clinton or Trump, but they supported the loser to deepen the political divide in our country. Now that Trump is President they're working with the far left, who you clearly support now, and leveraging them through agents of influence to tear our country apart by focusing on complete nonsense. I wonder if the Russian bots you warn us about are posting the twitter twits you continue to post at a pace no one can keep up with. Recent studies indicate if you post a lie repeatedly, people will start believing it. Are you sure you are not unwittingly supporting Russia now? How can you be sure? Isn't the purpose of Russia disinformation to create doubt? Clearly we have plenty of that in our country now, but I'm keeping faith. This to will pass someday.
    GOP: No contact
    CIA: We found contact
    GOP: Everybody has contact, but no treason
    FBI: We found treason
    GOP: Everybody commits treason.


    Brennan yesterday that many somehow did not clearly and concisely hear.....

    Brennan: “frequently, individuals who go along that treasonous path” don't even realize it till it's too late
    Last edited by OUTLAW 09; 05-24-2017 at 10:24 AM.

  14. #834
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    35,749

    Default

    The Beleaguered Tenants of ‘Kushnerville’

    Tenants in more than a dozen Baltimore-area rental complexes complain about a property owner who they say leaves their homes in disrepair, humiliates late-paying renters and often sues them when they try to move out. Few of them know that their landlord is the president’s son-in-law.


    https://www.propublica.org/article/t...f-kushnerville

    This is the same real estate company that was hawking EB-1B Green Card visas to wealthly Chinese investors during a recent China sales blitz if they would invest 500,000 USDs in Kushner Real Estate...

  15. #835
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    35,749

    Default

    Today Giuliani tells Court he had no hand in Trump travel ban, despite telling FoxNews he put a commission together for Trump

    Currently the Trump WH better stated Trump is in full contempt of Federal Courts for not producing the Giuliani Muslim travel ban memo that both he and the Trump WH stated before the ban actually existed....

    He also bragged on FOX News about Trump having contacted him and HE had given advice about how to write the order!!!

  16. #836
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    35,749

    Default

    Brennan also TS briefed in Aug and Sept 2016 the Congressional Gang of Eight about Russian meddling and it appears than then both Ryan and McConnel remained largely silent....

    Appears both the GOP and Trump have not read this particular individual...Brennan has as it the secret behind every successful CI investigation..
    Attached Images Attached Images
    Last edited by OUTLAW 09; 05-24-2017 at 10:47 AM.

  17. #837
    Council Member davidbfpo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    13,366

    Default No, Impeachment Doesn't Work That Way

    As Buzz News has just been cited on another thread I found this article from them of interest, partly as I sit across the water watching events unfold. A key passage since it appears here as a 'fact':
    But impeachment has not commenced, and while individual members might be reviewing the process, there is no formal action in motion. The Supreme Court would not notify the president of the start of an impeachment process, and his pardon powers are not impeded currently (or by impeachment). Finally, there is no reason to believe the marshal — responsible for court security — spoke with Trump about anything, let alone a nonexistent impeachment “case.”
    Link:https://www.buzzfeed.com/chrisgeidne...work-that-way?
    Last edited by davidbfpo; 05-24-2017 at 11:11 AM. Reason: 50,396v
    davidbfpo

  18. #838
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    35,749

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by davidbfpo View Post
    As Buzz News has just been cited on another thread I found this article from them of interest, partly as I sit across the water watching events unfold. A key passage since it appears here as a 'fact':Link:https://www.buzzfeed.com/chrisgeidne...work-that-way?
    Buzzfeed is not always accurate nor correctly informed.........

    If you take this....

    1. Wash Post story RE Court Order & Rudy's memo.
    On 5/20 POTUS in contempt pf court in 3 separate Fed District
    https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...=.88b24ebd4177

    2. AND if you noticed the Federal Eastern District of Virginias Court order which I previously posted here TASKING Federal Marshalls to serve a "Contempt of Court" order.......

    So for Buzzfeed to state what they did is in fact simply wrong and misleading....

    3. THEN if Buzzfeed had read also what I posted here THERE is a very distinct concept called "intent to impeach" VS. the actual "impeachment process".

    4. If in fact Buzzfeed had accurately researched the 1978 Congressional document on impeachment it is CLEARLY so stated ......

    The core reason that the "intent to impeach" process is started is in fact to ensure that sitting President cannot issue any pardon on Federal indictments and or convictions.....BUT Trump cannot pardon anyone indicted and or convicted in State Courts....

    Also posted here.....

    5. If Buzzfeed had noticed the THREE Federal Courts handling the Trump Muslim Ban court hearings had all demanded the Trump Guiliana Ban memo.....and they answer to the US Supreme Court..who would have in fact sent a US Marshall to inform Trump that he and his WH failed to provide the Federal Court ordered memo under "discovery"....as it was the Trump WH named in the Court orders.....
    Last edited by OUTLAW 09; 05-24-2017 at 06:21 PM.

  19. #839
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    35,749

    Default

    https://www.theatlantic.com/politics...igence/527862/

    The Questions About Obstruction Now Spread to White House Staff

    Reports that presidential aides asked senior intelligence officials to help shut down the FBI investigation put those staffers in legal jeopardy.

    Adam Serwer May 23, 2017

    According to the Post, “In addition to the requests to Coats and Rogers, senior White House officials sounded out top intelligence officials about the possibility of intervening directly with Comey to encourage the FBI to drop its probe of Michael Flynn.” The Post quoted one official who characterized the White House’s line of questioning as: “Can we ask him to shut down the investigation? Are you able to assist in this matter?”

  20. #840
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    35,749

    Default

    EXCLUSIVE:

    Judiciary Committee Considering Articles of Impeachment

    By Louise Mensch and Claude Taylor

    Multiple sources close to the intelligence, justice and law enforcement communities say that the House Judiciary Committee is considering Articles of Impeachment against the President of the United States.

    Sources further say that the Supreme Court notified Mr. Trump that the formal process of a case of impeachment against him was begun, before he departed the country on Air Force One. The notification was given, as part of the formal process of the matter, in order that Mr. Trump knew he was not able to use his powers of pardon against other suspects in Trump-Russia cases. Sources have confirmed that the Marshal of the Supreme Court spoke to Mr. Trump.

    It was reported this week that Mr. Trump had texted Lt. Gen. Mike Flynn the message ‘Stay strong’. This might be interpreted as an attempt to intimidate a witness, sources say.

    Deputy Attorney General Rosenstein met with the House Judiciary Committee this week in closed session.

    The authors have previously reported exclusively on Patribotics that a sealed indictment exists against Donald Trump.

Similar Threads

  1. Germany (catch all, incl. terrorism)
    By DDilegge in forum Europe
    Replies: 355
    Last Post: 06-28-2019, 03:43 PM
  2. LG Hal Mcmaster, National Security Adviser (2017 onwards)
    By SWJ Blog in forum Politics In the Rear
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 04-05-2018, 01:35 AM
  3. Syria in 2016 (October onwards)
    By OUTLAW 09 in forum Middle East
    Replies: 2624
    Last Post: 12-31-2016, 12:32 PM
  4. The Army: A Profession of Arms
    By Chuck Grenchus, CAPE in forum Miscellaneous Goings On
    Replies: 160
    Last Post: 07-08-2014, 04:00 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •